Comparative Molecular Active Site Analysis (CoMASA). 1. An approach to rapid evaluation of 3D QSAR

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 47, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 2732-2742

  Kotani, Takayuki ^a   Higashiura, Kunihiko ^a  

^a Nippon Zoki Pharmaceutical Co   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; EVALUATION; PHARMACOPHORE; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

BINDING SITES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CYCLOOXYGENASE 2; CYCLOOXYGENASE 2 INHIBITORS; CYCLOOXYGENASE INHIBITORS; ISOENZYMES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROSTAGLANDIN-ENDOPEROXIDE SYNTHASES; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; STEROIDS;

EID: 2542452014     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm030364c     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Cramer, R. D., III; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of Shape on Binding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
2. Kellogg, G. E.; Abraham, D. J. Hydrophobicity: Is LogP(o/w) More Than the Sum of Its Parts? Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 35, 651-661.
3. Klebe, G.; Abraham, U.; Mietzner, T. Molecular Similarity Indices in a Comparative Analysis (CoMSIA) of Drug Molecules to Correlate and Predict Their Biological Activity. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 4130-4146.
4. Klebe, G. Comparative Molecular Similarity Indices Analysis: CoMSIA. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1998, 12/13/14, 87-104.
5. Klebe, G.; Abraham, U. Comparative Molecular Similarity Index Analysis (CoMSIA) to Study Hydrogen-Bonding Properties and to Score Combinatorial Libraries. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1999, 13, 1-10.
6. Goodford, P. J. A Computational Procedure for Determining Energetically Favorable Binding Sites on Biologically Important Macromolecules. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 849-857.
7. Boobbyer, D. N. A.; Goodford, P. J.; McWhinnie, P. M.; Wade, R. C. New Hydrogen-Bond Potentials for Use in Determining Energetically Favorable Binding Sites on Molecules of Known Structure. J. Med. Chem. 1989, 32, 1083-1094.
8. Wade, R.; Clerk, K. J.; Goodford, P. J. Further Development of Hydrogen Bond Function for Use in Determining Generically Favorable Binding Sites on Molecules of Known Structure. Ligand Probe Groups with the Ability to Form Two Hydrogen Bonds. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 140-147.
9. Sulea, T.; Oprea, T. I.; Muresan, S.; Chan, S. L. A Different Method for Steric Field Evaluation in CoMFA Improves Model Robustness. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 1162-1170.
10. Gaillard, P.; Carrupt, P. A.; Testa, B.; Boudon, A. Molecular Lipophilicity Potential, a Tool in 3D QSAR: Method and Applications. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 83-96.
11. Furet, P.; Cohen, N. C. 3D Molecular Lipophilicity Potential Profiles: A New Tool in Molecular Modeling. J. Mol. Graph. 1988, 6, 182-189.
12. Fauchère, J. L.; Quarendon, P.; Kaetterer, L. Estimating and Representing Hydrophobicity Potential. J. Mol. Graph. 1988, 6, 202-206.
13. Silverman, B. D.; Platt, D. E.; Pitman, M.; Rigoutsos, I. Comparative Molecular Moment Analysis (CoMMA). Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1998, 12/13/14, 183-196.
14. Robert, D.; Amat, L.; Carbo-Dórca, R. Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships from Tuned Molecular Quantum Similarity Measures: Prediction of the Corticosteroid-Binding Globulin Binding Affinity for a Steroid Family. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 333-344.
15. Silverman, B. D.; Platt, D. E.; Pitman, M.; Rigoutsos, I. Comparative Molecular Moment Analysis (CoMMA). Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1998, 12/13/14, 183-196.
16. Lobato, M.; Amat, L.; Besalu, E.; Carbó-Dorca, R. Structure-Activity Relationships of a Steroid Family Using Quantum Similarity Measures and Topological Quantum Similarity Indices. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1997, 16, 465-472.
17. Kearsley, S. K.; Smith, G. M. An Alternative Method for the Alignment of Molecular Structures: Maximizing Electrostatic and Steric Overlap. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 1990, 3, 615-633.
18. Klebe, G.; Mietzner, T.; Weber, F. Different Approaches Toward an Automatic Structural Alignment of Drug Molecules: Applications to Sterol Mimics, Thrombin and Thermolysin Inhibitors. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994. 8. 751-778.
19. 2-Guided Region Selection for Comparative Molecular Field Analysis: a Simple Method to Achieve Consistent Results. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1060-1066.
20. 2 Guided Region Selection for CoMFA Studies. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1998, 12/13/14, 57-69.
21. Doweyko, A. M. Three-Dimensional Pharmacophores from Binding Data. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1769-1778.
22. Doweyko, A. M. The Hypothetical Active Site Lattice. An Approach to Modelling Active Sites From Data on Inhibitor Molecules. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 1396-1406.
23. Guccione, S.; Doweyko, A. M.; Chen, H.; Barretta, G. U.; Balzano, F. 3D-QSAR Using 'Multiconformer' Alignment: the Use of HASL in the Analysis of 5-HT1A Thienopyrimidinone Ligands. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 647-657.
24. Oprea, T. I.; Ciubotariu, D.; Sulea, T. I.; Simon, Z. Comparison of the Minimal Steric Difference (MTD) and Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA) Methods for Analysis of Bonding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1993, 12, 21-26.
25. Ciubotariu, D.; Deretey, E.; Oprea, T. I.; Sulea, T.; Simon, Z.; Kurunczi, L.; Chiriac, A. Multiconformational Minimal Steric Difference. Structure-Acetylcholinesterase Hydrolysis Rates Relations for Acetic Acid Esters. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1993, 12, 367-372.
26. Kurunczi, L.; Olah, M.; Oprea, T. I.; Bologa, C.; Simon, Z. MTD-PLS: A PLS-Based Variant of the MTD Methodol. 2. Mapping Ligand-Receptor Interactions. Enzymatic Acetic Acid Esters Hydrolysis. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 841-846.
27. Oprea, T. I.; Kurunczi, L.; Olah, M.; Simon, Z. MTD-PLS: A PLS-Based Variant of the MTD Methodol. A 3D-QSAR Analysis of Receptor Affinities for a Series of Halogenated Dibenzoxin and Biphenyl Derivatives. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2001, 12, 75-92.
28. Kroemer, R. T.; Hecht, P. A New Procedure for Improving the Predictiveness of CoMFA Models and its Application to a Set of Dihydrofolate Reductase Inhibitors. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1995, 9, 396-406.
29. Kotani, T.; Higashiura, K. Rapid Evaluation of Molecular Shape Similarity Index Using Pairwise Calculation of the Nearest Atomic Distances. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 58-63.
30. WebLab ViewerLite 4.0, Accelrys Inc., San Diego, CA.
31. Good, A. C.; Hodgkin, E. E.; Richards, W. G. Utilization of Gaussian Functions for the Rapid Evaluation of Molecular Similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 188-191.
32. Good, A. C.; Richards, W. G. Rapid Evaluation of Shape Similarity Using Gaussian Function. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1993, 33, 112-116.
33. Viswanadhan, V. N.; Ghose, A. K.; Revankar, G. R.; Robins, R. K. Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three-Dimensional Structure Directed Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. 4. Additional Parameters for Hydrophobic and Dispersive Interactions and Their Applications for an Automated Super-imposition of Certain Naturally Occurring Nucleoside Antibiotics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 163-172.
34. Viswanadhan, V. N.; Ghose, A. K.; Singh, U. C.; Wendoloski, J. J. Prediction of Solvation Free Energies of Small Organic Molecules: Additive-Constitutive Models Based on Molecular Fingerprints and Atomic Constants. J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 405-412.
35. Viswanadhan, V. N.; Ghose, A. K.; Wendoloski, J. J. Estimating Aqueous Solvation and Lipophilicity of Small Organic Molecules: A Comparative Overview of Atom/group Contribution Methods. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 2000, 19, 85-98.
36. Viswanadhan, V. N.; Reddy, M. R.; Bacquet, R. J.; Erion, M. D. Assessment of Methods Used for Predicting Lipophilicity: Application to Nucleosides and Nucleoside Bases. J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1019-1026.
37. Lemmen, C.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. FlexS: A Method for Fast Flexible Ligand Superposition. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 4502-4520.
38. Liu, H.; Huang, X.; Shen, J.; Luo, X.; Li, M.; Xiong, B.; Chen, G.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Chen, K. Inhibitory Mode of 1,5-Diarylpyrazole Derivatives Against Cyclooxygenase-2 and Cyclooxygenase-1: Molecular Docking and 3D QSAR Analyses. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 4816-4827.
39. Bush, B. L.; Nachbar, R. B., Jr. Sample-Distance Partial Least Squares: PLS Optimized for Many Variables, with Application to CoMFA. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1993, 7, 587-619.
40. Nilsson, J. Multiway Calibration in 3D QSAR. Applications to Dopamine Receptor Ligands. URL at http://www.ub.rug.nl/eldoc/ dis/science/j.nilsson.
41. Waller, C. L.; Oprea, T. I.; Giolitti, A.; Marshall, G. R. Three-Dimensional QSAR of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (I) Protease Inhibitors. 1. A CoMFA Study Employing Experimentally-Determined Alignment Rules. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 4152-4160.
42. Waller, C. L.; Marshall, G. R. Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme and Thermolysin Inhibitors. II. A Comparison of CoMFA Models Incorporating Molecular Orbital Fields and Desolvation Free Energies Based on Active-Analogue and Complementary-Receptor-Field Alignment Rules. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 2390-2403.
43. The steroid structures can be downloaded in the Gasteiger's group Website: http://www2.chemie.uni-erlangen.de/services/ steroids/.
44. MOPAC 93 by Stewart, J. J. P., Fujitsu. MOPAC 93.01 revised for Cygwin by Kotani, T.
45. Good, A. C.; So, S. S.; Richards, W. G. Structure-activity relationships from molecular similarity matrices. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 433-438.
46. Soliva, R.; Almansa, C.; Kalko, S. G.; Luque, F. J.; Orozco, M. Theoretical Studies on the Inhibition Mechanism of Cyclooxygenase-2. Is There a Unique Recognition Site? J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 1372-1382.