Comparative interactomics analysis of protein family interaction networks using PSIMAP (protein structural interactome map)

Bioinformatics

Volumn 21, Issue 15, 2005, Pages 3234-3240

  Park, Daeui ^a   Lee, Semin ^b   Bolser, Dan ^c   Schroeder, Michael ^d   Lappe, Michael ^e   Oh, Donghoon ^a   Bhak, Jong ^b,f  

^a Object Interaction Technologies Inc   (South Korea)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^c MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^d DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^e MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

^f Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; PROTEOME;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARCHAEBACTERIUM; ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; EUKARYOTE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTE; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SPECIES COMPARISON; SPECIES DIVERSITY; ALGORITHM; CHROMOSOME MAP; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVALUATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ARCHAEA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

ALGORITHMS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEOME; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 25144431896     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti512     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alexandrov,N.N. and Go,N. (1994) Biological meaning, statistical significance and classification of local spatial similarities in nonhomologous proteins. [i#Protein Sci.#1i], [b#3#1b], 866-875.
2. Aloy,P. and Russell,R.B. (2002) Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology. [i#Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA#1i], [b#99#1b], 5896-5901.
3. Altschul,S.F. [i#et al.#1i] (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. [i#Nucleic Acids Res.#1i] [b#25#1b], 3389-3402.
4. Apic,G. [i#et al.#1i] (2001) An insight into domain combinations. [i#Bioinformatics#1i], [b#17#1b] (Suppl. 1), S83-S89.
5. Aravind,L. [i#et al.#1i] (2000) Lineage-specific loss and divergence of functionally linked genes in eukaryotes. [i#Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA#1i] [b#97#1b], 11319-11324.
6. Barabasi,A.L. and Oltvai,Z.N. (2004) Network biology: Understanding the cell's functional organization. [i#Nat. Rev. Genet.#1i], [b#5#1b], 101-113.
7. Berman,H.M. [i#et al.#1i] (2000) The Protein Data Bank. [i#Nucleic Acids Res.#1i], [b#28#1b], 235-242.
8. Bernal,A. [i#et al.#1i] (2001) Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD): A monitor of genome projects world-wide. [i#Nucleic Acids Res.#1i], [b#29#1b], 126-127.
9. Bolser,D.M. and Park,J.H. (2003) Biological network evolution hypothesis applied to protein structural interactome. [i#Genomics Inform.#1i], [b#1#1b] 7-19.
10. Bolser,D. [i#et al.#1i] (2003) Visualisation and graph-theoretic analysis of a large-scale protein structural interactome. [i#BMC Bioinformatics#1i] [b#4#1b], 45.
11. Camon,E. [i#et al.#1i] (2004) The Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) Database: Sharing knowledge in Uniprot with Gene Ontology. [i#Nucleic Acids Res.#1i], [b#32#1b], D262-D266.
12. Chothia,C. (1992) Proteins. One thousand families for the molecular biologist. [i#Nature#1i], [b#357#1b], 543-544.
13. Dandekar,T. [i#et al.#1i] (1998) Conservation of gene order: A fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. [i#Trends Biochem. Sci.#1i], [b#23#1b], 324-328.
14. Dorogovtsev,S.N. and Mendes,J.F. (2002) Evolution of networks. [i#Adv. Phys.#1i], [b#51#1b], 1079-1187.
15. Eichler,E.E. and Sankoff,D. (2003) Structural dynamics of eukaryotic chromosome evolution. [i#Science#1i], [b#301#1b], 793-797.
16. Enright,A.J. [i#et al.#1i] (1999) Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events. [i#Nature#1i], [b#402#1b], 86-90.
17. Eriksen,K.A. and Hornquist,M. (2002) Scale-free growing networks imply linear preferential attachment. [i#Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys.#1i], [b#65#1b], 017102.
18. Fraser,H.B. [i#et al.#1i] (2002) Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. [i#Science#1i], [b#296#1b], 750-752.
19. Gibney,B.R. [i#et al.#1i] (1996) Ferredoxin and ferredoxin-heme maquettes. [i#Proc Natl Acad. Sci. USA#1i], [b#93#1b], 15041-15046.
20. Gong,S. [i#et al.#1i] (2005) PSIbase: A database of Protein Structural Interactome map (PSIMAP). [i#Bioinformatics#1i], [b#21#1b], 2541-2543.
21. Harris,M.A. [i#et al.#1i](2004) The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. [i#Nucleic Acids Res.#1i], [b#32#1b], D258-D261.
22. Huynen,M.A. and Bork,P. (1998) Measuring genome evolution. [i#Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA#1i], [b#95#1b], 5849-5856.
23. Jeong,H. [i#et al.#1i] (2001) Lethality and centrality in protein networks. [i#Nature#1i], [b#411#1b], 41-42.
24. Jeong,H. [i#et al.#1i] (2003) Measuring preferential attachment for evolving networks. [i#Europhys. Lett.#1i], [b#61#1b], 567-572.
25. Koonin,E.V. (2000) How many genes can make a cell: The minimal-gene-set concept. [i#Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.#1i], [b#1#1b], 99-116.
26. Marcotte,E.M. [i#et al.#1i] (1999) Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. [i#Science#1i], [b#285#1b], 751-753.
27. Mason,J.R. and Cammack,R. (1992) The electron-transport proteins of hydroxylating bacterial dioxygenases. [i#Annu. Rev. Microbiol.#1i], [b#46#1b] 277-305.
28. Moon,H.S. [i#et al.#1i] (2005) Architecture of basic building blocks in protein and domain structural interaction networks. [i#Bioinformatics#1i] [b#21#1b], 1479-1486.
29. Murzin,A.G. [i#et al.#1i] (1995) SLOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. [i#J. Mol. Biol.#1i], [b#247#1b], 536-540.
30. Mushegian,A. (1999) The minimal genome concept. [i#Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.#1i], [b#9#1b], 709-714.
31. Nancy,A.M. [i#et al.#1i] (1995) Faster evolutionary rates in endosymbiotic bacteria than in cospeciating insect hosts. [i#J. Mol. Evol.#1i], [b#41#1b], 727-731.
32. Newman,M.E. (2001) Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. [i#Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys.#1i], [b#64#1b], 025102.
33. Ng,S.K. [i#et al.#1i] (2003) Integrative approach for computationally inferring protein domain interactions. [i#Bioinformatics#1i], [b#19#1b], 923-929.
34. O'Brien,S.J. [i#et al.#1i] (1999) The promise of comparative genomics in mammals. [i#Science#1i], [b#286#1b], 458-462, 479-481.
35. Orengo,C.A. [i#et al.#1i] (1994) Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. [i#Nature#1i], [b#372#1b], 631-634.
36. Otaka,E. and Ooi,T. (1989) Examination of protein sequence homologies: V. New perspectives on evolution between bacterial and chloroplast-type ferredoxins inferred from sequence evidence. [i#J. Mol. Evol.#1i], [b#29#1b] 246-254.
37. Overbeek,R. [i#et al.#1i] (1999) The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. [i#Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA#1i], [b#96#1b], 2896-2901.
38. Park,J. [i#et al.#1i] (2001) Mapping protein family interactions: intramolecular and intermolecular protein family interaction repertoires in the PDB and yeast. [i#J. Mol. Biol.#1i], [b#307#1b], 929-938.
39. Pellegrini,M. [i#et al.#1i] (1999) Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: Protein phylogenetic profiles. [i#Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA#1i], [b#96#1b], 4285-4288.
40. Pruess,M. [i#et al.#1i] (2003) The Proteome Analysis database: A tool for the [i#in silico#1i] analysis of whole proteomes. [i#Nucleic Acids Res.#1i] [b#31#1b], 414-417.
41. Rubin,G.M. [i#et al.#1i] (2000) Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. [i#Science#1i], [b#287#1b], 2204-2215.
42. Shendure,J. [i#et al.#1i] (2004) Advanced sequencing technologies: methods and goals. [i#Nat. Rev. Genet.#1i], [b#5#1b], 335-344.
43. Steffen,M. [i#et al.#1i] (2002) Automated modelling of signal transduction networks. [i#BMC Bioinformatics#1i], [b#3#1b], 34.
44. Tan,S.H. [i#et al.#1i] (2004) ADVICE: Automated Detection and Validation of Interaction by Co-Evolution. [i#Nucleic Acids Res.#1i], [b#32#1b], W69-W72.
45. Tatusov,R.L. [i#et al.#1i] (1997) A genomic perspective on protein families. [i#Science#1i], [b#278#1b], 631-637.
46. van Mering,C. [i#et al.#1i] (2002) Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. [i#Nature#1i], [b#417#1b], 399-403.
47. Wagner,A. (2001) The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. [i#Mol. Biol. Evol.#1i], [b#18#1b], 1283-1292.
48. Wang,Z.X. (1996) How many fold types of protein are there in nature? [i#Proteins#1i], [b#26#1b], 186-191.
49. Zhang,C.T. (1997) Relations of the numbers of protein sequences, families and folds. [i#Protein Eng.#1i], [b#10#1b], 757-761.