Further comparison of primary hit identification by different assay technologies and effects of assay measurement variability

Journal of Biomolecular Screening

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 581-589

  Wu, Xiang ^a,b   Sills, Matthew A ^a,c   Ziiang, Ji Hu ^a  

^a NOVARTIS INSTITUTES FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b EXELIXIS INC   (United States)

^c Pharmacopeia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Alphascreen ; Assay comparison; Assay concordance; Assay variability; High throughput screening; TR FRET

Indexed keywords

CELL NUCLEUS RECEPTOR; FARNESOID X RECEPTOR;

ARTICLE; ASSAY; AUTOMATION; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICE; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HISTOGRAM; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; AUTOMATION; BIOTIN; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; DRUG INDUSTRY; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; LIGANDS; MINIATURIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; RATS; RECEPTORS, CYTOPLASMIC AND NUCLEAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 24944561210     PISSN: 10870571     EISSN: 1552454X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1087057105275628     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hertzberg RP, Pope AJ: High-throughput screening: new technology for the 21st century. Curr Opin Chem Bio 2000;4:445-451.
2. Sundberg SA: High-throughput and ultra-high-throughput screening: solution- and cell-based approaches. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2000;11:47-53.
3. Hemmila IA, Hurskainen P: Novel detection strategies for drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 2002;7:S150-S156.
4. Lahana R: How many leads from HTS? Drug Discov Today 1999;4:447-448.
5. Kennedy T: Managing the drug discovery/development interface. Drug Discov Today 1997;2:436-444.
6. Zhang J-H, Chung TDY, Oldenburg KR: A simple statistic parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J Biomol Screen 1999;4:67-73.
7. Sills MA, Weiss D, Pham Q, Schweitzer R, Wu X. Wu JJ: Comparison of assay technologies for a tyrosine kinase assay generates different results in high throughput screening. J Biomol Screen 2002;7:191-214.
8. Wu X, Glickman JF, Bowen BR, Sills MA: Comparison of assay technologies for a nuclear receptor assay screen reveals differences in the sets of identified functional antagonists. J Biomol Screen 2003;8:381-392.
9. Wu JJ, Born T, Storch E, Kowski T, Billingsley W, Ragan S, et al: The influence of different assay technologies on the identification of small molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions for multiple members of the TNF superfamily. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Biomolecular Screening, Baltimore, September 2001.
10. Stancato L, Eessalu T, Wyatt G, Mudd R, Bronson D, Barbee J, et al: Comparison of data from high throughput screening for kinase inhibitors using radiometric, fluorescent and microfluidic approaches. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Biomolecular Screening, Baltimore, September 2001.
11. Hentz N, Eckols K, Wegrzyn J, Dixon J, Weidner J: Microfluidic chip-based vs. plate-based HTS: a comparison of data quality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Biomolecular Screening, Portland, September 2003.
12. Kashem M, Yingling J, Nelson R, Homon C: New tools for screening protein kinases: a comparative study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Biomolecular Screening, Portland, September 2003.
13. Glickman JF, Wu X, Mercuri R, Illy C, Bowen BR, He Y et al: A comparison of ALPHAScreen, TR-FRET, and TRF as assay methods for FXR nuclear receptors. J Biomol Screen 2002;7:3-10.
14. Zhang J-H, Wu X, Sills MA: Probing the primary screening efficiency by multiple replicate testing: a quantitative analysis of hit confirmation and false screening results of a biochemical screening. J Biomol Screen 2005. Accepted for publication.
15. Zhong B, Shao J: Evaluating the agreement of two quantitative assays with repeated measurements. J Biopharm Stat 2003;13:75-86.
16. Perkin Elmer. A practical guide to working with AlphaScreen™. Application note S4077. Available from: http://las.perkinelmer.com/content/ RelatedMaterials/AlphaScreen_Guide.pdf.