How social dominance orientation and job status influence perceptions of African-American affirmative action beneficiaries

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 703-744

  Aquino, Karl ^a   Stewart, Marcus M ^b   Reed II, Americus ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BENTLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944462298     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.681.x     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Aiken LS, West SG. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Arbuckle JL. (2003). Amos 5 [Computer software]. Chicago: Smallwaters.
3. Barden J, Maddux WW, Petty RE, Brewer MB. (2004). Contextual moderation of racial bias: The impact of social roles on controlled and automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 5-22.
4. Bargh JA, Chartrand TL. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.
5. Baron RM, Kenny DA. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personaity and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6. Bobo LD, Massagli MP. (2001). Stereotyping and urban inequality. In O'Connor A, Tilly C, Bobo LD (Eds.), Urban inequality: Evidence from four cities (pp. 89-162). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7. Carli LL, Eagly AH. (1999). Gender effects on social influence and emergent leadership. In Powell GN (Ed.), Handbook of Gender and Work (pp. 203-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Cose E. (1993). The rage of a privileged class. New York: HarperCollins.
9. Crosby FJ, Iyer A, Clayton S, Downing RA. (2003). Affirmative action: Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist, 58, 93-115.
10. Dasgupta N, Greenwald AG. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800-814.
11. Devine PG. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
12. Devine PG, Baker SM. (1991). Measurement of racial stereotype subtyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 44-50.
13. Duckitt J. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In Zanna MP (Ed.), Advances in experimental psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Duckitt J, Wagner C, du Plessis H, Birum I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93.
15. Eden D. (2003). Self-fulfilling prophecies in organizations. In Greenberg J (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (pp. 91-124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Evans DC. (2003). A comparison of the other-directed stigmatization produced by legal and illegal forms of affirmative action. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 121-130.
17. Federico CM, Sidanius J. (2002). Racism, ideology, and affirmative action revisited: The antecedents and consequences of "principled objections" to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 488-502.
18. th edition, vol. 2, pp. 357-411). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
19. Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
20. Fiske ST, Xu J, Cuddy A, Glick P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-491.
21. Foschi M. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 21-42.
22. Garcia LT, Erskine N, Hawn, Casmay SR. (1981). The effect of affirmative action on attributions about minority group members. Journal of Personality, 49, 427-437.
23. Gilbert DT, Hixon JG. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of Stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509-517.
24. Guimond S, Dambrun M, Michinov N, Duarte S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697-721.
25. Heilman ME. (1994). Affirmative action: Some unintended consequences for working women. In Cummings LL, Staw BM (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 16, pp. 125-169). Greewich, CT: JAI Press.
26. Heilman ME, Blader SL. (2001). Assuming preferential selection when the admissions policy is unknown: The effects of gender rarity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 188-193.
27. Heilman ME, Block CJ, Lucas JA. (1992). Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 536-544.
28. Heilman ME, Battle WS, Keller CE, Lee RA. (1998). Type of affirmative action policy: A determinant of reactions to sex-based preferential selection? Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 190-205.
29. Humphrey R. (1985). How work roles influence perception: Structural cognitive processes and organizational behavior. American Sociological Review, 50, 242-252.
30. Jost JT, Banaji MR. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
31. Jost JT, Glaser J, Kruglanski AW, Sulloway FJ. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
32. Jost JT, Thompson EP. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
33. Kelley HH. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
34. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Bolger N. (1998). Data analysis is social psychology. In Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th edition, pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
35. Kravitz DA. (1995). Attitudes toward affirmative action plans directed at Blacks: Effects of plan and individual differences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 2192-2220.
36. Kravitz DA, Harrison DA, Turner ME, Levine EL, Chaves W, Brannick MT, et al. (1997). Affirmative action: A review of psychological and behavioral research. Bowling Green, OH: Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
37. Kravitz DA, Platania J. (1993). Attitudes and beliefs about affirmative action: Effects of target and of respondent sex and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 928-938.
38. Kruglanski AW. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford Press.
39. Kunda Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
40. Kunda Z, Spencer SJ. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 522-544.
41. Lerner MJ. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
42. Linville PW, (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 42, 193-211.
43. Lucas JW. (2003). Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. American Sociological Review, 68, 464-480.
44. McClelland GH, Judd CM. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-390.
45. Moskowitz GB, Gollwitzer PM, Wasel W, Schaal B. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 167-184.
46. Myrdal G. (1944). An American dilemma. New York: Harper & Row.
47. Northcraft GB, Martin J. (1982). Double jeopardy: Resistance to affirmative action from potential beneficiaries. In Gutek B (Ed.), Sex role stereotyping and affirmative action policy (pp. 81-130). Los Angeles: University of California, Institute of Industrial Relations.
48. Parker CP, Baltes BB, Christiansen ND. (1997). Support for affirmative action, justice perceptions, and work attitudes: A study of gender and ethnic group differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 376-389.
49. Pratto F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. In Zanna MP (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 191-263). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
50. Pratto F, Sidanius J, Stallworth LM, Malle BF. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
51. Resendez MG. (2002). The stigmatizing effects of affirmative action: An examination of moderating variables. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 185-206.
52. Rosenthal R. (1974). On the psychology of the self-fulfilling prophecy: Further evidence for pygmalion effects and their mediating mechanisms. New York: MSS Modular Publications, Module 53.
53. Roth BM. (1990). Social psychology's racism. Public Interest, 27, 155-171.
54. Sande GN, Ellard JH, Ross M. (1986). Effect of arbitrarily assigned status labels on self-perceptions and social perceptions: The mere position effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 684-689.
55. Sears DO, Hetts JJ, Sidanius J, Bobo L. (2000). Race in American politics. In Sears DO, Sidanius J, Bobo L (Eds.), Racialized politics: Values, ideology, and prejudice in American public opinion (pp. 1-43). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Sidanius J, Pratto F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Sidanius J, Pratto F, Bobo L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476-490.
58. Sinclair S, Sidanius J, Levin S. (1998). The interface between ethnic and social system attachment: The differential effects of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating environments. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 741-757.
59. Sniderman PM, Piazza T. (1993). The scar of race. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
60. Son Hing LS, Bobocel DR, Zanna MP. (2002). Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 493-509.
61. Taylor SE, Crocker J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In Higgins ET, Herman CP, Zanna MP (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (vol. 1, pp. 89-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Thernstrom S, Thernstrom A. (1997). America in black and white: One nation indivisible. New York: Simon & Schuster.
63. Webster M, Jr, Hysom SJ. (1998). Creating status characteristics. American Sociological Review, 63, 351-378.
64. Williams WE. (1997). Affirmative action can't be mended. Cato Journal, 17, 1-10.
65. Winquist LA, Mohr CD, Kenny DA. (1998). The female positivity effect in the perception of others. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 370-388.