Automated docking of maltose, 2-deoxymaltose, and maltotetraose into the soybean β-amylase active site

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 166-175

  Laederach, Alain ^a   Dowd, Michael K ^b   Coutinho, Pedro M ^c   Reilly, Peter J ^a  

^a Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN REGIONAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

Author keywords

amylase; 2 deoxymaltose; Active site; AutoDock; Automated docking; Maltal; Maltose; Maltotetraose; Simulated annealing

Indexed keywords

BETA AMYLASE; MALTOSE; MALTOTRIOSE;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CARBOHYDRATE ANALYSIS; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME CONFORMATION; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BETA-AMYLASE; BINDING SITES; CARBOHYDRATE SEQUENCE; MALTOSE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; OLIGOSACCHARIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SOYBEANS;

EID: 0032716849     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19991101)37:2<166::AID-PROT3>3.0.CO;2-E     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ohlsson E. The two components of malt diastase, especially with reference to the mutarotation of the products formed in the hydrolysis of starch. Z Physiol Chem 1930;189:17-63.
2. Bailey JM., French D. Significance of multiple reactions in enzyme-polymer systems. J Biol Chem 1957;226:1-14.
3. French D, Youngquist RW. The mode of action of β-amylase on starch oligosaccharides. Stärke 1963;15:425-431.
4. Nitta Y, Kunikata T, Watanabe T. Kinetic study of soybean β-amylase. The effect of pH. J Biochem 1979;85:41-45.
5. Summer R, French D. Action of β-amylase on branched oligosaccharides. J Biol Chem 1956;222:469-477.
6. Hehre EJ, Okada G, Genghof DS. Configurational specificity: unappreciated key to understanding enzymic reversions and de novo glycosidic bond synthesis. I. Reversal of hydrolysis by α-, β-, and glucoamylases with donors of correct anomeric form. Arch Biochem Biophys 1969;135:75-89.
7. Hehre EJ, Kitahata S, Brewer CF. Catalytic flexibility of glycosylases. The hydration of maltal by β-amylase to form 2-deoxymaltose. J Biol Chem 1986;261:2147-2153.
8. Kitahata S, Chiba S, Brewer CF, Hehre EJ. Mechanism of maltal hydration catalyzed by β-amylase. Role of protein structure in controlling the steric outcome of reactions catalyzed by a glycosylase. Biochemistry 1991;30:6769-6775.
9. Mikami B, Hehre EJ, Sato M, et al. The 2.0-Å resolution structure of soybean β-amylase complexed with a-cyclodextrin. Biochemistry 1993;32:6836-6845.
10. Mikami B, Degano M, Hehre EJ, Sacchettini JC. Crystal structures of soybean β-amylase and maltal: active site components and their apparent roles in catalysis. Biochemistry 1994;33:7779-7787.
11. Kraulis PJ. MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1991;24: 946-950.
12. Davies GJ, Wilson KS, Henrissat B. Nomenclature for sugar-binding subsites in glycosyl hydrolases. Biochem J 1997;321:557-559.
13. Kawazu T, Nakanishi Y, Uozumi N, et al. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the gene coding for enzymatically active fragments of the Bacillus polymyxa β-amylase. J Bacteriol 1987;169:1564-1570.
14. Kreis M, Williamson M, Buxton B, Pywell J, Hejgaard J, Svendsen I. Primary structure and differential expression of β-amylase in normal and mutant barleys. Eur J Biochem 1987;169:517-525.
15. Siggens KW. Molecular cloning and characterization of the β-amylase gene from Bacillus circulans. Mol Microbiol 1987;1:86-91.
16. Kitamoto N, Yamagata H, Kato T, Tsukagoshi N, Udaka S. Cloning and sequencing the gene encoding thermophilic β-amylase of Clostridium thermosulfurgenes. J Bacteriol 1988;170:5848-5854.
17. Mikami B, Morita Y, Fukazawa C. Primary structure and function of β-amylase. Seikagaku 1988;60:211-216.
18. Yoshida N, Nakamura K. Molecular cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of cDNA encoding the subunit of sweet potato β-amylase. J Biochem 1991;110:196-201.
19. Monroe JD, Salminen MD, Preiss J. Nucleotide sequence of a cDNA clone encoding a β-amylase from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 1991;97:1599-1601.
20. Pujadas G, Ramírez FM, Valero R, Palau J. Evolution of β-amylase: Patterns of variation and conservation in subfamily sequences in relation to parsimony mechanisms. Proteins 1996;25: 456-472.
21. Kunikata T, Nishimura S, Nitta Y. Maltal binding mechanism and a role of the mobile loop of soybean β-amylase. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 1996;60:1104-1108.
22. Coutinho PM, Dowd MK, Reilly PJ. Automated docking of monosaccharide substrates and analogues and methyl α-acarviosinide in the glucoamylase active site. Proteins 1997;27:235-248.
23. Coutinho PM, Dowd MK, Reilly PJ. Automated docking of isomaltose analogues in the glucoamylase active site. Carbohydr Res 1997;297:309-324.
24. Coutinho PM, Dowd MK, Reilly PJ. Automated docking of glucosyl disaccharides in the glucoamylase active site. Proteins 1997;28: 162-173.
25. Coutinho PM, Dowd MK, Reilly PJ. Automated docking of α-(1,4)-and α-(1,6)-linked glucosyl trisaccharides in the glucoamylase active site. Ind Eng Chem Res 1998;37:2148-2157.
26. Goodsell DS, Olson AJ. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins 1990;8:195-202.
27. Goodsell DS, Lauble H, Stout CD, Olson AJ. Automated docking in crystallography: analysis of the substrates of aconitase. Proteins 1993;17:1-10.
28. Goodsell DS, Morris GM, Olson AJ. Docking of flexible ligands. Applications of AutoDock. J Mol Recog 1996;9:1-5.
29. Vriend G, Hooft RWW, van Aalten T. WHAT IF manual. Heidelberg, Germany: European Molecular Biology Laboratory; 1997. http://www.swift.embl-heidelberg.de/whatif/.
30. Imberty A, Hardman KD, Carver JP, Pérez S. Molecular modelling of protein-carbohydrate interactions: docking of monosaccharides in the binding site of concanavalin A. Glycobiology 1991;1:631-642.
31. Pérez S, Meyer C, Imberty A. Practical tools for molecular modeling of complex carbohydrates and their interactions with proteins. In: Pullman A, Jortner J, Pullman B, editors. Modelling of biomolecular structures and mechanisms. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995. p 425-454.
32. Mehler EL, Solmajer T. Electrostatic effects in proteins: comparison of dielectric and charge models. Protein Eng 1991;4:903-910.
33. Allinger NL, Yuh YH, Lii JH. Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. J Am Chem Soc 1989;111:8551-8566.
34. Lii JH, Allinger NL. Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. Vibrational frequencies and thermodynamics. J Am Chem Soc 1989;111:8566-8575.
35. Allinger NL, Rahman M, Lii JH. A molecular mechanics field (MM3) for alcohols and ethers. J Am Chem Soc 1990;112:8293-8307.
36. Dowd MK, Zeng J, French AD, Reilly PJ. Conformational analysis of the anomeric forms of kojibiose, nigerose, and maltose using MM3. Carbohydr Res 1992;230:223-244.
37. Mikami B, Adachi M, Kage T, et al. Structure 1b9z, Bacillus cereus β-amylase complexed with maltose. Brookhaven Protein Databank, 1999.