Comparing nickel- and palladium-catalyzed Heck reactions

Organometallics

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 2114-2123

  Lin, Bo Lin ^a   Liu, Lei ^a,b   Fu, Yao ^a   Luo, Shi Wei ^a   Chen, Qian ^a   Guo, Qing Xiang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENERGY BARRIERS; HECK REACTIONS; OXIDATIVE ADDITION; REDUCTIVE PATHWAY;

CATALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; ENTROPY; FREE ENERGY; NICKEL; OXIDATION; PALLADIUM; POTENTIAL ENERGY; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SOLVENTS; SUBSTITUTION REACTIONS; THERMODYNAMICS; VIBRATION MEASUREMENT;

REACTION KINETICS;

EID: 2442609566     PISSN: 02767333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/om034067h     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. (a) Heck, R. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 146.
2. (b) Ma, S. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 11, 561.
3. (e) de Meijere, A.; Meyer, F. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2379.
4. (d) Cabri, W.; Candiani, I. Acc. Chem. fies. 1995, 28, 2.
5. (e) Crisp, G. T. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1998, 27, 427.
6. (f) Whitcombe, N. J.; Hii, K. K.; Gibson, S. E. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 7449.
7. (g) Dounay, A. B.; Overman, L. E. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2945.
8. Iyer, S. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 490, C27.
9. (a) Ikeda, Y.; Nakamura, T.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6514.
10. (b) Fujioka, T.; Nakamura, T.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima, K. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2257.
11. Iyer, S.; Ramesh, C.; Sarkar, A.; Wadgaonkar, P. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8113.
12. (a) Boldrini, G. P.; Savola, D.; Tagllavini, E.; Trombini, C.; Umanironchi, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 301, C62.
13. (b) Lebedev, S. A.; Lopatina, V. S.; Petrov, E. S.; Beletskaya, I. P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 344, 253.
14. (c) Kong, K.-C.; Cheng, C.-H. Organometallics 1992, 11,1972.
15. (d) Sustmann, S.; Hopp, P.; Holl, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 689.
16. (e) Kelkar, T.; Hanoaka, T.; Kubota, Y.; Sugi, Y. Catal. Lett. 1994, 29, 69.
17. (f) Herrmann, W. A.; Cornils, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1048.
18. (b) Iyer, S.; Thakur, V. V. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 157, 275.
19. (b) Iyer, S.; Thakur, V. V. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2000, 157, 275.
20. Bhanage, B. M.; Zhao, F.; Shirai, M.; Arai, M. Catal. Lett. 1998, 54, 195.
21. Beletskaya, I. P.; Cheprakov, A. V. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 3009.
22. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, F.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.7; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
23. (a) Hay, P. J.; Wadt, W. R. J. Chem. Phys 1985, 82, 299.
24. (b) Dunning, T. H.; Hay, P. J. Modern Theoretical Chemistry; Schaefer, H. F., Ed.; Plenum: New York, 1976; Vol. 3, p 1.
25. (c) Ehlers, A. W.; Bohme, M.; Dapprich, S.; Gobbi, A.; Hollwarth, A.; Jonas, V.; Kohler, K. F.; Stegmann, R.; Veldkamp, A.; Frenking, G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 208, 111.
26. (d) Hollwarth, A.; Bohme, M.; Dapprich, S.; Ehlers, A. W.; Gobbi, A.; Jonas, V.; Kohler, K. F.; Stegmann, R.; Veldkamp, A.; Frenking, G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 208, 237.
27. (a) Fan, L.; Krzywicki, A.; Somogyvari, Z. T. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 4003.
28. (b) Musaev, D. G.; Svensson, M.; Morokuma, S.; Stromberg, S.; Zetterberg, K.; Siegbahn, P. E. M. Organometallics 1997, 16, 1933.
29. (c) Deng, L.; Woo, T. K.; Cavallo, L.; Margl, P. M.; Ziegler, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6177.
30. (d) Michalak, A.; Ziegler, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12266.
31. (e) Zhang, D.-J.; Liu, C.-B. Huaxue Xuebao 2001, 69, 1406.
32. (f) Tomita, T.; Takahama, T.; Sugimoto, M.; Sakaki, S. Organometallics 2002, 21, 4138.
33. (g) Zhang, D.-J.; Liu, C.-B.; Liu, Y.J.; Hu, H.-Q. Chin. J. Chem. 2002, 20, 220.
34. (h) Zhang, D.-J.; Zhang, C.-Q.; Liu, C.-B. Gaodeng Xuexiao Huaxue Xuebao 2002, 23, 876.
35. (i) Tobisoh, S. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 4756
36. (j) Liu, Y.; Liu, J.-W.; Yang, X.-Z. Wuli Huaxue Xuebao 2002, 18, 1068.
37. (k) Tobiseh, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 96.
38. (l) Deubel, D. V.; Ziegler, T. Organometallics 2002, 21, 4432.
39. (m) Michalak, A.; Ziegler, T. Organometallics 2003, 22, 2660.
40. (n) Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Drew, G. B. M.; Liu, J.-W. Chin. J. Chem. 2003, 21, 481
41. (o) Li, Q. S.; Guan, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 8584.
42. (p) Schlappi, D. N.; Cedeno, D. L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 8673.
43. (q) Liu, Y.; Yang, Z.-D.; Liu, Y. Huaxue Xuebao 2003, 61, 1528.
44. (r) Alexander, B. D.; Dines, T. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 146.
45. Albert, K.; Gisdakis, P.; Riösch, N. Oganometallics 1998, 17, 1608.
46. Sundermann, A.; Uzan, O.; Martin, J. M. L. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1703.
47. (a) Tomasi, J.; Persico, M. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2027.
48. (b) Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Tomasi, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3210.
49. (c) Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Tomasi, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 870.
50. (d) Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Tomasi, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 4690.
51. (a) Amatore, C.; Jutand, A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 178-180, 511.
52. (b) Amatore, C.; Fuxa, A.; Jutand, A. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1474.
53. (c) Amatore, C.; Carre, E.; Jutand, A.; Medjour, Y. Organometallcs 2002, 21, 4540.
54. (a) Rajaram, J.; Pearson, R. G.; Ibers, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 2103.
55. (b) Stille, J. K.; Lau, K. S. Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 1978, 9, 434.
56. (c) Amatore, C.; Azzabi, D.; Jutand, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1670.
57. (d) Brown, J. M.; Cooley, N. A. Oganometallics 1990, 9, 353.
58. An alternative mechanism for oxidative addition (i.e., a mechanism via ate complexes) has been investigated by Siegbahn et al. (see: Siegbahn, P. E. M.; Blomberg, M. R. A. Catal. Met. Complexes 1995, 18, 15.
59. Tolman, C. A.; Seidel, W. C.; Gerlach, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 2669.
60. The product of oxidative addition could isomerize to a trans complex. However, we only considered the cis complex in this study to simplify the calculations.
61. Thorn, D. L.; Hoffmann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2079.
62. Deeth et al. proposed that β-hydrogen elimination did not occur in the Heck reactions because the agostic hydrogen is kinetically the more acidic one and hence preferentially deprotonated. (See: (a) Deeth, R. J.; Smith, A.; Hii, K. K.; Brown, J. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3229. (b) Hii, K. K.; Claridge, T. D. W.; Brown, J. M.; Smith, A.; Deeth, R. J. Helv. Chim, Acta 2002, 84, 3043.) In disagreement with Death's proposal, our results suggest that β-elimination is the preferential pathway. It is noteworthy that others have also proposed the β-hydrogen elimination pathway in related reactions. Some also found that β-hydrogen elimination occurs more easily in the Pd complex than in the Ni complex (see: Musaev, D. G.; Morokuma, K. Top. Catal. 1999, 7, 107).
63. Deeth et al. proposed that β-hydrogen elimination did not occur in the Heck reactions because the agostic hydrogen is kinetically the more acidic one and hence preferentially deprotonated. (See: (a) Deeth, R. J.; Smith, A.; Hii, K. K.; Brown, J. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3229. (b) Hii, K. K.; Claridge, T. D. W.; Brown, J. M.; Smith, A.; Deeth, R. J. Helv. Chim, Acta 2002, 84, 3043.) In disagreement with Death's proposal, our results suggest that β-elimination is the preferential pathway. It is noteworthy that others have also proposed the β-hydrogen elimination pathway in related reactions. Some also found that β-hydrogen elimination occurs more easily in the Pd complex than in the Ni complex (see: Musaev, D. G.; Morokuma, K. Top. Catal. 1999, 7, 107).
64. Deeth et al. proposed that β-hydrogen elimination did not occur in the Heck reactions because the agostic hydrogen is kinetically the more acidic one and hence preferentially deprotonated. (See: (a) Deeth, R. J.; Smith, A.; Hii, K. K.; Brown, J. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 3229. (b) Hii, K. K.; Claridge, T. D. W.; Brown, J. M.; Smith, A.; Deeth, R. J. Helv. Chim, Acta 2002, 84, 3043.) In disagreement with Death's proposal, our results suggest that β-elimination is the preferential pathway. It is noteworthy that others have also proposed the β-hydrogen elimination pathway in related reactions. Some also found that β-hydrogen elimination occurs more easily in the Pd complex than in the Ni complex (see: Musaev, D. G.; Morokuma, K. Top. Catal. 1999, 7, 107).
65. (a) von Schenck, H.; Stroemberg, S.; Zetterberg, K.; Ludwig, M.; Akermark, B.; Svensson, M. Organometallics 2001, 20, 2813.
66. (b) von Sohenok, H.; Kermark, B.; Svensson, M. Organometallics 2002, 21, 2248.
67. (c) von Schenck, H.; Kermark, B.; Svensson, M. J. Am, Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3503.
68. Ozawa, F.; Kubo, A.; Hayashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 1417.
69. (a) Amatore, C.; Carre, E.; Jutand, A.; M'Barki, M.; Meyer, G. Organometallica 1995, 14, 5605.
70. (b) Amatore, C.; Jutand, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 314.