Convergence among cave catfishes: Long-branch attraction and a Bayesian relative rates test

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 1101-1113

  Wilcox, T P ^a   Garcia De Leon F J ^b   Hendrickson, D A ^a   Hillis, D M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Inst Tecn de   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMEIURUS; ICTALURIDAE; ICTALURUS; PRIETELLA LUNDBERGI; PRIETELLA PHREATOPHILA; SILURIFORMES;

EID: 2442596112     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bull, J.J., Badgett, M.R., Wichman, H.A., Huelsenbeck, J.P., Hillis, D.M., Gulati, A., Ho, C., Molineux, I.J., 1997. Exceptional convergent evolution in a virus. Genetics 147, 1497-1507.
2. Cannone, J.J., Subramanian, S., Schnare, M.N., Collett, J.R., D'Souza, L.M., Du, Y., Feng, B., Lin, N., Madabusi, L.V., Muller, K.M., Pande, N., Shang, Z., Yu, N., Gutell, R.R., 2002. The comparative RNA web (CRW) site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BioMed. Central Bioinformat. 3, 2.
3. Carranza, J., 1954. Descripción del primer bagre anoftalmo y depigmentado encontrado en aguas Mexicanas. Ciéncia, México 14, 129-136.
4. Christiansen, K., 1961. Convergence and parallelism in cave entomobryinae. Evolution 15 (3), 288-301.
5. Culver, D.C., Kane, T.C., Fong, D.W., 1995. Adaptation and Natural Selection in Caves - the Evolution of Gammarus Minimus. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Doolittle, R.F., 1994. Covergent evolution: the need to be explicit. Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 15-18.
7. Dowling, T.E., Martasian, D.P., Jeffery, W.R., 2002. Evidence for multiple genetic forms with similar eyeless phenotypes in the blind cavefish, Astyanax mexicanus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 446-455.
8. Espinasa, L., Borowsky, R., 2001. Origins and relationship of cave populations of the blind Mexican tetra, Astyanax fasciatus, in the Sierra de El Abra. Environ. Biol. Fishes 62, 233-237.
9. Felsenstein, J., 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibilty methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27, 401-410.
10. Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791.
11. Gatesy, J.G., Amato, M., Norell, R.D., Heyashi, C., 2003. Combined support for wholesale taxic atavism in gavialine crocodylians. Syst. Biol. 52, 403-422.
12. Goldman, N., Anderson, J.P., Rodrigo, A.G., 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst Biol. 49, 652-670.
13. Hardman, M., 2002. The phylogenetic relationships among extant catfishes, with special reference to Ictaluridae (Otophysi: Siluriformes). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
14. Hardman, M., Page, L.M., 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among bullhead catfishes of the genus Ameiurus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae). Copeia 2003, 20-33.
15. Hendrickson, D.A., Krejca, J.K., Rodriguez, J.M., 2001. Mexican blindcats, genus Prietella (Ictaluridae): review and status based on recent explorations. Environ. Biol. Fishes 62, 315-337.
16. Hillis, D.M., Mable, B.K., Moritz, C., 1996. Applications of molecular systematics and the future of the field. In: Hillis, D.M., Moritz, C., Mable, B.K. (Eds.), Molecular Systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp. 515-543.
17. Hobbs III, H.H., 2001. A new cave crayfish of the genus Orconectes, subgenus Orconectes, from southcentral Missouri, USA with a key to the stygobitic species of the genus (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana 74, 635-646.
18. Holsinger, J.R., 1967. Systematics, speciation, and distribution of the subterranean amphipod genus Stygonectes (Gammaridae). US Nat. Mus. Bull. 259, 1-176.
19. Huelsenbeck, J.P., 1997. Is the Felsenstein zone a fly trap? Syst. Biol. 46, 69-74.
20. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Hillis, D.M., 1993. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 42, 247-264.
21. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Hillis, D.M., Jones, R., 1996a. Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenetics: application and performance. In: Ferraris, J.D., Palumbi, S.R. (Eds.), Molecular Zoology: Strategies and Protocols. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 19-45.
22. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Hillis, D.M., Nielsen, R., 1996b. A likelihood ratio test of monophyly. Syst. Biol. 45, 546-558.
23. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F., 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17, 754-755.
24. Humphrey, W.E., Díaz, T., 2003. Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous Stratigraphy and Tectonics of Northeast Mexico. Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.
25. Langecker, T.G., Longley, G., 1993. Morphological adaptations of the Texas blind catfishes Trogloglanis pattersoni and Satan eurystomus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) to their underground environment. Copeia 1993, 976-986.
26. Larget, B., Simon, D., 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 750-759.
27. Longley, G., Karnei Jr., H.S., 1979a. Status of Satan eurystomus Hubbs and Bailey, the widemouth blindcat. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Endang. Sp. Rept. 5 (1), 1-48.
28. Longley, G., Karnei Jr., H.S., 1979b. Status of Trogloglanis pattersoni Eigenmann, the toothless blindcat. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Endang. Sp. Rept. 5 (2), 1-54.
29. Lundberg, J.G., 1982. The comparative anatomy of the toothless blindcat, Trogloglanis pattersoni Eigenmann, with a phylogenetic analysis of the ictalurid catfishes. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 163, 1-85.
30. Lundberg, J.G., 1992. The phylogeny of ictalurid catfishes: A synthesis of recent work. In: Mayden, R.L. (Ed.), Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 392-420.
31. Lundberg, J.G., PyDaniel, L.R., 1994. Bathycetopsis oliveirai, gen. et sp. nov., a blind and depigmented catfish (Siluriformes: Cetopsidae) from the Brazilian Amazon. Copeia 1994, 381-389.
32. Mayden, R.L., Burr, B.M., Page, L.M., Miller, R.R., 1992. The native freshwater fishes of North America. In: Mayden, R.L. (Ed.), Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 827-863.
33. Miller, R.R., Smith, M.L., 1986. Origin and geography of the fishes of central Mexico. In: Hocutt, C.H., Wiley, E.O. (Eds.), The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes. Wiley, New York, pp. 487-517.
34. Mitchell, R.W., Russell, W.H., Elliott, W.R., 1977. Mexican eyeless characin fishes of the genus Astyanax: environment, distribution and evolution. Texas Tech University, Lubbock.
35. Morán-Zenteno, D., 1994. Geology of the Mexican Republic. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
36. Palumbi, S.R., 1996. Nucleic acids II: the polymerase chain reaction. In: Hillis, D.M., Moritz, C., Mable, B.K. (Eds.), Molecular Systematics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp. 205-248.
37. Posada, D., Crandall, K.A., 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817-818.
38. Poulson, T.L., 2001. Adaptations of cave fishes with some comparisons to deep-sea fishes. Environ. Biol. Fishes 62, 345-364.
39. Smith, M.L., Miller, R.R., 1986. The evolution of the Rio Grande basin as inferred from its fish fauna. In: Hocutt, C.H., Wiley, E.O. (Eds.), The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes. Wiley, New York, pp. 457-485.
40. Strecker, U., Bernatchez, L., Wilkens, H., 2003. Genetic divergence between cave and surface populations of Astyanax in Mexico (Characidae; Teleostei). Mol. Ecol. 2003, 699-710.
41. Stewart, C.-B., Schilling, J.W., Wilson, A.C., 1988. Convergent evolution of lysozymes? Nature 332, 787-788.
42. Swofford, D.L., 1998. PAUP* 4.0: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony and Other Methods. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
43. Swofford, D.L., Olsen, G.J., Addel, P.J., Hillis, D.M., 1996. Phylogenetic Inference. In: Hillis, D.M., Moritz, C., Mable, B.K. (Eds.), Molecular Systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp. 407-514.
44. Tajima, F., 1993. Simple methods for testing the molecular evolutionary clock hypothesis. Genetics 135, 599-607.
45. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., Gibson, T.J., 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680.
46. Walsh, S.J., Gilbert, C.R., 1995. New species of troglobitic catfish of the genus Prietella (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) from northeastern México. Copeia 1995, 850-860.
47. Wiens, J.J., Chippindale, P.T., Hillis, D.M., 2003. When are phylogenetic analyses misled by convergence? A case study in Texas cave salamanders. Syst. Biol. 52, 501-514.
48. Wilcox, T.P., Zwickl, D.J., Heath, T.A., Hillis, D.M., 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25, 361-371.
49. Wu, C.I., Li, W.H., 1985. Evidence for higher rates of nucleotide substitution in rodents than in man. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 1741-1745.
50. Yang, Z., Yoder, A.D., 2003. Comparison of likelihood and Bayesian methods for estimating divergence times using multiple gene loci and calibration points, with application to a radiation of cute-looking mouse lemur species. Syst. Biol. 52, 705-716.