Monophyletic relationship between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and group 2 coronaviruses

Journal of Infectious Diseases

Volumn 189, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1676-1678

  Zhu, Guan ^a,b   Chen, Hsuan Wien ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; AVIAN INFECTIOUS BRONCHITIS VIRUS; BAYES THEOREM; BOVINE DIARRHEA VIRUS; CORONAVIRUS; ENTERIC VIRUS; ENTEROVIRUS; GENOME ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; MONOPHYLY; MURINE HEPATITIS CORONAVIRUS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PORCINE EPIDEMIC DIARRHEA VIRUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SARS CORONAVIRUS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRANSMISSIBLE GASTROENTERITIS VIRUS;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CATTLE; CORONAVIRUS; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MICE; PHYLOGENY; SARS VIRUS; VIRAL PROTEINS;

EID: 2442473752     PISSN: 00221899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/382892     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Drosten C, Gunther S, Preiser W, et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:1947-58.
2. Marra MA, Jones SJ, Astell CR, et al. The genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus. Science 2003; 300:1399-404.
3. Rota PA, Oberste MS, Monroe SS, et al. Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science 2003; 300:1394-9.
4. Leung FC. Hong Kong SARS sequence. Science 2003; 301:309-10.
5. Ksiazek TG, Erdman D, Goldsmith CS, et al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:1953-66.
6. Ruan YJ, Wei CL, Ee AL, et al. Comparative full-length genome sequence analysis of 14 SARS coronavirus isolates and common mutations associated with putative origins of infection. Lancet 2003; 361:1779-85.
7. Philippe H, Laurent J. How good are deep phylogenetic trees? Curr Opin Genet Dev 1998; 8:616-23.
8. Swofford DL. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Versions 4.0b4a and 4.0b6. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, 2000.
9. Strimmer K, von Haeseler A. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol Biol Evol 1996; 13:964-9.
10. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP: phylogeny inference package. Version 3.6a3. Seattle: Department of Genetics, University of Washington, 2002.
11. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001; 17:754-5.
12. Kishino H, Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J Mol Evol 1989; 29:170-9.
13. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 1999; 16:1114-6.
14. Farris JS, Kallersjo M, Kluge AG, Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 1995; 10:315-9.
15. Snijder EJ, Bredenbeek PJ, Dobbe JC, et al. Unique and conserved features of genome and proteome of SARS-coronavirus, an early split-off from the coronavirus group 2 lineage. J Mol Biol 2003; 331:991-1004.