The current state of in-vivo pre-clinical animal models for heart valve evaluation

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 423-432

  Gallegos, Robert P ^a   Nockel, Pavel J ^a   Rivard, Andrew L ^a   Bianco, Richard W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK MANAGEMENT; THROMBOGENICITY; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; CATTLE; DOG; EVALUATION; HUMAN; PROSTHESIS; REVIEW; SAFETY; SHEEP; SWINE;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; DEVICE APPROVAL; DOGS; EVALUATION STUDIES; GUIDELINES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MODELS, ANIMAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SAFETY; SHEEP; SWINE;

EID: 24344463444     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Sapirstein JS, Smith PK. The 'ideal' replacement heart valve. Am Heart J 2001;141:856-860
2. Salerno CT, Droel J, Bianco RW. Current state of in vivo preclinical heart valve evaluation. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:158-162
3. Bianco RW, Phillips R, Mrachek J, Witson J. Feasibility evaluation of a new pericardial bioprosthesis with dye mediated photo-oxidized bovine pericardial tissue. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5:317-322
4. Schoen FJ. Pathologic findings in explanted clinical bioprosthetic valves fabricated from photooxidized bovine pericardium. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:174-179
5. Smith B. Developing a comprehensive quality system, medical device and diagnostic industry. Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry 2004;27:48-55
6. Aasen AO, Resch F, Semb BJ, et al. Development of a canine model for long-term studies after mitral valve replacement with the Hall-Kaster prosthesis. Eur Surg Res 1980;12:199-207
7. Bianco RW, St. Cyr JA, Schneider JR, et al. Canine model for long-term evaluation of prosthetic mitral valves. J Surg Res 1986;41:134-140
8. Grehan JF, Hilbert SL, Ferrans VJ, Droel JS, Salerno CT, Bianco RW. Development and evaluation of a swine model to assess the preclinical safety of mechanical heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:710-719; discussion 719-720
9. Dewanjee MK, Solis E, Mackey ST, et al. Quantification of regional platelet and calcium deposition on pericardial tissue valve prostheses in calves and effect of hydroxyethylene diphosphonate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92(3 Pt.1):337-348
10. Dewanjee MK, Singh SK, Wooley PH, Mackey ST, Solis E, Kaye MP. Identification of new collagen formation with 125I-labeled antibody in bovine pericardial tissue valves implanted in calves. Int J Rad Appl Instrum B 1986;13:413-422
11. Schoen FJ, Levy RJ, Nelson AC, Bernhard WF, Nashef A, Hawley M. Onset and progression of experimental bioprosthetic heart valve calcification. Lab Invest 1985;52:523-532
12. Salerno CT, Pederson TS, Ouyang DW, Bolman RM, III, Bianco RW. Chronic evaluation of orthotopically implanted bileaflet mechanical aortic valves in adult domestic sheep. J Invest Surg 1998;11:341-347
13. Grehan JF, Casagrande I, Oliveira EL, et al. A juvenile sheep model for the long-term evaluation of stentless bioprostheses implanted as aortic root replacements. J Heart Valve Dis 2001;10:505-512
14. Ouyang DW, Salerno CT, Pederson TS, Bolman RM, III, Bianco RW. Long-term evaluation of orthotopically implanted stentless bioprosthetic aortic valves in juvenile sheep. J Invest Surg 1998;11:175-183
15. Gregoric I, Conger JL, Reul H, et al. Preclinical assessment of a trileaflet mechanical valve in the mitral position in a calf model. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:196-202
16. Brockman SK, Collins HA, Snyder HE. The normal mode of action of the mitral valve and its alteration following replacement by a prosthetic ball valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1965;50:820-826
17. Gott VL, Daggett RL, Koepke DE, Whiffen JD, Dutton RC, Young WP. Replacement of the canine mitral valve with a graphite coated hinged-leaflet valve. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1966;123:43-50
18. Pappas G, Titus JL, Berghuis J, McKenzie MB, Ellis FH, Jr. Dog mitral valve homografts and heterografts. Surg Forum 1966;17:175-176
19. Rastelli GC, Tsakiris AG, Banchero N, Wood EH, Kirklin JW. Cardiac performance after replacement of the dog mitral valve with Starr-Edwards prosthesis with and without preservation of the chordae tendineae. Surg Forum 1966;17:178-179
20. Smeloff EA. [Evaluation of prosthetic heart valves]. Kyobu Geka 1967;20:816-820
21. Weldon CS, Ameli MM, Morovati SS. Mitral and tricuspid valve replacement with stented aortic valve homografts. Arch Surg 1967;95:862-870
22. Kalke BR, Carlson RG, Lillehei CW. Hingeless double-leaflet prosthetic heart valve for aortic, mitral or tricuspid positions. Biomed Sci Instrum 1968;4:190-196
23. Otter GD. Total prosthetic replacement of atrioventricular valves in the dog. I. Development of a free-floating cone valve for the right atrioventricular ostium. Thorax 1968;23:173-181
24. Otter GD. Total prosthetic replacement of atrioventricular valves in the dog. II. Development of a tilting cone mitral prosthesis. Thorax 1968;23:182-186
25. Cross FS, Akao M, Jones RD. The evaluation of experimental mitral valve prostheses in the dog. Surgery 1969;65:89-97
26. Imamura E, Kaye MP, Davis GD. Radiographic assessment of leaflet motion of Gore-Tex laminate trileaflet valves and Hancock xenograft in tricuspid position of dogs. Circulation 1977;56:1053-1058
27. Jones RD, Akao M, Cross FS. Bacteremia and thrombus on prosthetic heart valves in dogs. Circulation 1969;39(5 Suppl.1):I253-I256
28. Bodnar E. The Medtronic Parallel valve and the lessons learned. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5:572-573
29. Goodman SL. Sheep, pig, and human platelet-material interactions with model cardiovascular biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:240-250
30. Gross DR. Thromboembolic phenomena and the use of the pig as an appropriate animal model for research on cardiovascular devices. Int J Artif Organs 1997;20:195-203
31. Reverdiau-Moalic P, Watier H, Vallee I, Lebranchu Y, Bardos P, Gruel Y. Comparative study of porcine and human blood coagulation systems: Possible relevance in xenotransplantation. Transplant Proc 1996;28:643-644
32. Linden BC, Schumacher CW, MacIver RH, Mrachek JP, Bianco RW. Paravalvular leaks around prosthetic valves implanted in the mitral position: Technical refinements of the ovine model. J Heart Valve Dis 2003;12:400-405
33. Gregoric ID, Eya K, Tamez D, et al. Preclinical hemodynamic assessment of a new trileaflet mechanical valve in the aortic position in a bovine model. J Heart Valve Dis 2004;13:254-259
34. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003;108:983-988
35. Pibarot P, Honos GN, Durand LG, Dumesnil JG. The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. Can J Cardiol 1996;12:379-387
36. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, Cartier P, Metras J, Durand LG. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:211-218
37. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Jobin J, Lemieux M, Honos G, Durand LG. Usefulness of the indexed effective orifice area at rest in predicting an increase in gradient during maximum exercise in patients with a bioprosthesis in the aortic valve position. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:542-546
38. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Cartier PC, Metras J, Lemieux MD. Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71(5 Suppl.):S265-S268
39. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Patient-prosthesis mismatch is not negligible. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1983-1984
40. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1131-1141
41. Ruel M, Rubens FD, Masters RG, et al. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:149-159
42. Ruel M, Kulik A, Rubens FD, et al. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:364-370
43. David TE, Ropchan GC, Butany JW. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine bioprostheses. J Card Surg 1988;3:501-505
44. Barnhart GR, Jones M, Ishihara T, Chavez AM, Rose DM, Ferrans VJ. Failure of porcine aortic and bovine pericardial prosthetic valves: An experimental investigation in young sheep. Circulation 1982;66(2 Pt.2):I150-I153
45. Barnhart GR, Jones M, Ishihara T, Chavez AM, Rose DM, Ferrans VJ. Bioprosthetic valvular failure. Clinical and pathological observations in an experimental animal model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982;83:618-631
46. Sato M, Harasaki H. Evaluation of platelet and coagulation function in different animal species using the xylum clot signature analyzer. Am Soc Artif Intern Organs J 2002;48:360-364
47. Mueller XM, Tevaearai HT, Jegger D, Tucker O, von Segesser LK. Are standard human coagulation tests suitable in pigs and calves during extracorporeal circulation? Artif Organs 2001;25:579-584
48. Taylor DE, Whamond JS. A method of producing graded stenosis of the aortic and mitral valves in sheep for fluid dynamic studies. J Physiol 1975;244:16P-17P
49. Su-Fan Q, Brum JM, Kaye MP, Bove AA. A new technique for producing pure aortic stenosis in animals. Am J Physiol 1984;246(2 Pt.2):H296-H301
50. Rogers WA, Bishop SP, Hamlin RL. Experimental production of supravalvular aortic stenosis in the dog. J Appl Physiol 1971;30:917-920
51. Spratt JA, Olsen CO, Tyson GS, Jr., Glower DD, Jr., Davis JW, Rankin JS. Experimental mitral regurgitation. Physiological effects of correction on left ventricular dynamics. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:479-489
52. Gross DR. Animal Models in Cardiovascular Research. 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994
53. Amory H, McEntee K, Linden A, Desmecht D, Lekeux P. Measurement of right ventricular ejection fraction and volume by the thermodilution technique in the unsedated calf. Res Vet Sci 1994;56:75-81
54. Sands MP, Rittenhouse EA, Mohri H, Merendino KA. An anatomical comparison of human pig, calf, and sheep aortic valves. Ann Thorac Surg 1969;8:407-414
55. Salton CJ, Chuang ML, O'Donnell CJ, et al. Gender differences and normal left ventricular anatomy in an adult population free of hypertension. A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study of the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1055-1060
56. Slaap BR, Nielen MM, Boshuisen ML, van Roon AM, den Boer JA. Five-minute recordings of heart rate variability in obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder and healthy volunteers. J Affect Disord 2004;78:141-148
57. Hodgkin BC, Burkett DE, Smith EB. Noninvasive measurement of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in swine. Am J Physiol 1982;242:H127-H130
58. Amory H, Desmecht DJ, Linden AS, et al. Comparison of cardiac function in double-muscled calves and in calves with conventional muscular conformation. Am J Vet Res 1994;55:561-566
59. Lammers B, Heinrichs J. Monitoring dairy heifer growth. Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 1998