Policy orientation effects on performance with licensing to start-ups and small companies

Research Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1028-1042

  Powers, Joshua B ^a   McDougall, Patricia ^b  

^a INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Technology transfer; University start ups; US universities

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

ENTREPRENEURSHIPS; SUPPORT POLICY ORIENTATION; UNIVERSITY START-UPS; US UNIVERSITIES;

PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 24344433168     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.014     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. P.D. Allison Testing for interaction in multiple regression American Journal of Sociology 83 1977 144 153
2. N.S. Argyres, and J.P. Liebeskind Privatizing the intellectual commons: universities and the commercialization of biotechnology Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 35 1998 427 454
3. Association of University Technology Managers AUTM licensing survey: FY 2002 2003 AUTM Northbrook, IL
4. D.B. Audretsch, A.N. Link, and J.T. Scott Public/private technology partnerships: evaluating SBIR-supported research Research Policy 31 2002 145 158
5. B. Bozeman Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and Theory Research Policy 29 2000 627 655
6. M.J. Bray, and J.N. Lee University revenues from technology transfer: licensing fees versus equity positions Journal of Business Venturing 15 2000 385 392
7. Y. Caloghirou, I. Kastelli, and A. Tsakanikas Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Research Policy 24 2004 29 39
8. B. Clarysse, M. Wright, A. Lockett, E. Van de Velde, and A. Vohora Spinning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions Journal of Business Venturing 20 2005 183 216
9. J. Degroof, and E.B. Roberts Overcoming weak entrepreneurial infrastructures for academic spin-off ventures Journal of Technology Transfer 29 2004 327 352
10. W.J. Dennis Business Starts and Stops 1999 NFIB Education Foundation Washington, DC
11. D. DiGregorio, and S. Shane Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy 32 2003 209 227
12. D.D. Dill University-industry entrepreneurship: the organization and management of American university technology transfer units Higher Education 29 1995 369 384
13. H. Etzowitz The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages Research Policy 27 1998 823 833
14. H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster, C. Gebhardt, and B.R.C. Terra The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm Research Policy 29 2000 313 330
15. M. Feldman, I. Feller, J. Bercovitz, and R. Burton Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities Management Science 48 2002 105 121
16. J. Friedman, and J. Silberman University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer 28 2003 17 30
17. J. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations 1973 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
18. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., 1998. Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 5068.
19. M. Kenney Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region 2000 Stanford Business Books Stanford
20. A. Lockett, M. Wright, and S. Franklin Technology transfer and universities' spin-out strategies Small Business Economics 20 2003 185 200
21. F. Malerba, and L. Orsenigo Technological entry, exit, and survival: an empirical analysis of patent data Research Policy 28 1999 643 660
22. G.D. Markman, P.T. Gianiodis, P.H. Phan, and D.B. Balkin Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: do incentive systems matter? Journal of Technology Transfer 29 2004 353 364
23. C.A. Mertler, and R.A. Vannatta Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods 2002 Pyrczak Publishing Los Angeles
24. J.C. Nunnally Psychometric Theory 1967 McGraw-Hill New York
25. Porter, M.E., 2001. Clusters of innovation initiative; regional foundations of US competitiveness, Council on Competitiveness, Washington, DC.
26. W.W. Powell, K.W. Koput, J.I. Bowie, and L. Smith-Doerr The spatial clustering of science and capital: accounting for biotech firm-venture capital relationships Regional Studies 36 2002 291 305
27. J. Powers, and P.P. McDougall University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship Journal of Business Venturing 20 2005 291 311
28. J. Powers, and P.P. McDougall University entrepreneurship: testing a typology and its performance effects on technology licensing to firms that go public W. Bygrave C. Brush P. Davidsson J. Fiet J. Greene R. Harrison M. Lerner G. Meyer J. Sohl A. Zacharakis Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 2003 Babson College Babson Park, MA 594 603
29. R. Radosevich A model for entrepreneurial spin-offs from public technology sources International Journal of Technology Management 10 1995 879 893
30. E.B. Roberts Entrepreneurs in high technology: lessons from MIT and beyond 1991 Oxford University Press New York
31. E.B. Roberts, and D.E. Malone Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations R&D Management 26 1 1996 17 48
32. E.M. Rogers, J. Yin, and J. Hoffman Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer offices at US research universities 2000 AUTM Journal Northbrook, IL AUTM
33. N. Rosenberg, and R.R. Nelson American universities and technical advance in industry Research Policy 23 1994 323 348
34. P. Schmidt States push public universities to commercialize research March 29 Chronicle of Higher Education 2002 A26 A27
35. S. Shane, and T. Stuart Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups Management Science 48 2002 154 170
36. D.S. Siegel, D.A. Waldman, and A.N. Link Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study Research Policy 32 1 2003 27 48
37. S. Slaughter, and L. Leslie Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University 1997 Johns-Hopkins Baltimore
38. State Science and Technology Institute What is the State Government Role in the R&D Enterprise? 1997 SSTI Columbus, OH
39. K.E. Southwood Substantive theory and statistical interaction: five models American Journal of Sociology 83 1978 1154 1203
40. J. Thursby, and S. Kemp Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing Research Policy 31 2002 109 124
41. J.G. Thursby, and M.C. Thursby Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing Management Science 48 2002 90 104
42. L.G. Tornatzky Building State Economies by Promoting University-Industry Technology Transfer 2000 National Governor's Association Washington, DC
43. L.G. Zucker, M.R. Darby, and J. Armstrong Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology Management Science 48 2002 138 153