Central processing overlap modulates P3 latency

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 165, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 54-68

  Dell'Acqua, R ^a   Jolicoeur, P ^b   Vespignani, F ^a   Toffanin, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Central processing; P3; PRP paradigm

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; BRAIN; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; PITCH DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 23844500314     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2281-2     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Arnell KM, Helion AM, Hurdelbrink, JA, Pasieka B (2004) Dissociating sources of dual-task interference using human electrophysiology. Psychon Bull Rev 11:77-83
2. Bourke PA, Duncan J, Nimmo Smith I (1996) A general factor involved in dual-task performance decrement. Q J Exp Psychol Hum Exp Psychol 49A:525-545
3. Courchesne E, Hillyard SA, Courchesne RY (1977) P3 waves to the discrimination of targets in homogeneous and heterogeneous stimulus sequence. Psychophysiology 14:590-597
4. Crebolder JM, Jolicoeur P, Mcllwaine JD (2002) Loci of signal probability effects and of the attentional blink bottleneck. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:695-716
5. Dell'Acqua R, Jolicoeur P, Pesciarelli F, Job R, Palomba D (2003) Electrophysiological evidence of visual encoding deficits in a crossmodal attentional blink paradigm. Psychophysiology 40:629-639
6. Dien J, Spencer KM, Donchin E (2004) Parsing the late positive complex: mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology 41:665-678
7. Donchin E (1981) Surprise!... Surprise? Psychophysiology 18:493-513
8. Donchin E, Coles MGH (1988) Is the P3 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav Brain Sci 11:357-374
9. Duncan J, Owen AM (2000) Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Neurosci 23:475-483
10. Duncan-Johnson CC (1981) P3 latency: a new metric of information processing. Psychophysiology 18:207-215
11. Fabiani M, Karis D, Donchin E (1986) P3 and recall in an incidental memory paradigm. Psychophysiology 23:298-308
12. Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoorman J (1994) Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92:148-160
13. Hasher L, Zacks RT (1984) Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence. Am Psychol 39:1372-1388
14. Hazeltine E, Poldrack R, Gabrieli JD (2001) Neural activation during response competition. J Cogn Neurosci 12:118-129
15. Isreal JB, Chesney GL, Wickens CD, Donchin E (1980) P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. Psychophysiology 17:259-273
16. Jasper HH (1958) The ten-twenty electrode system in the International Federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 10:371-375
17. Jiang Y, Kanwisher N (2003a) Common neural mechanisms for response selection and perceptual processing. J Cogn Neurosci 15:1095-1110
18. Jiang Y, Kanwisher N (2003b) Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms. J Cogn Neurosci 15:1080-1094
19. Johnson R (1986) A triarchic model of P3 amplitude. Psychophysiology 23:367-384
20. Johnson R, Donchin E (1985) Second thoughts: multiple P300s elicited by a single stimulus. Psychophysiology 22:182-194
21. Jolicoeur P, Dell'Acqua R (1998) The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cogn Psychol 36:138-202
22. Katayama J, Polich J (1998) Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology 35:23-33
23. Knight RT (1991) Evoked potential studies of attention capacity in human frontal lobe lesions. In: Levin HS, Eisenmberg HM, Benton AL (eds) Frontal lobe function and dysfunction. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 139-153
24. Knight RT (1997) Distributed cortical networks for visual attention. J Cogn Neurosci 9:75-91
25. Kok A (2001) On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38:557-577
26. Luck SJ (1998) Sources of dual-task interference: evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychol Sci 9:223-227
27. Magliero A, Bashore TR, Coles MGH, Donchin E (1984) An analysis of the processing requirements of a complex perceptual-motor task. Hum Factors 25:597-621
28. McCann RS, Johnston JC (1992) Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:471-484
29. McCarthy G, Donchin E (1981) A metric for thought: a comparison of P3 latency and reaction time. Science 211:77-80
30. McCarthy G, Luby M, Gore JC, Goldman-Rakic P (1996) Functional magnetic resonance imaging in a visual oddball task. NeuroImage 3:S548
31. Meyer DE, Kieras DE (1997) A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and human multiple-task performance, Part 2: accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychol Rev 104:749-791
32. Miller JD, Pachella RB (1973) Locus of the stimulus probability effect. J Exp Psycho 101:227-231
33. Navon D, Miller J (2002) Queuing of sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cogn Psychol 44:193-251
34. Osman A, Moore C (1993). The locus of dual-task interference: psychological refractory effects on motor-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perfor 19:1292-1312
35. Pashler H (1989) Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cogn Psychol 21:469-514
36. Pashler H (1993) Dual-task interference and elementary mental mechanisms. In: Meyer DE, Kornblum S (eds) Attention and performance, XIV: synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience. MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp 45-264
37. Pashler H (1994) Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull 116:220-244
38. Pashler H, Johnston JC (1989) Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Q J Exp Psychol 41A: 19-45
39. Schubert T, Szameitat A (2003) Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: an fMRI study. Cogn Brain Res 17:733-746
40. Simons RF (1985) Event-related potentials elicited by automatic targets: a dual-task analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percep Perform 11:50-61
41. Sommer W, Leuthold H, Schubert T (2001) Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination. Psychon Bull Rev 8:81-88
42. Szameitat A, Schubert T, Müller K, von Cramon DY (2002) Localization of executive functions in dual-task performance with fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 14:1184-1199
43. Tombu M, Jolicoeur P (2003) A central capacity sharing model of dual task performance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:3-18
44. Van Selst M, Jolicoeur P (1997) Decision and response in dual-task interference. Cogn Psychol 33:266-307
45. Verleger R (1988) Event-related potentials and cognition: a critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of the P3. Behav Brain Sci 11:343-427
46. Verleger R (1997) On the utility of P3 latency as a measure of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology 34:131-156
47. Vogel EK, Luck SJ (2002) Delayed working memory consolidation during the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bull Rev 9:739-743
48. Welford AT (1952) The 'psychological refractory period' and the timing of high-speed performance - a review and a theory. Br J Psychol 43:2-19