Editorial: Journal Rankings: Save the Outlets for Your Research

Marketing Science

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 437-441

  Shugan, Steven M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic Journals; Citations; Marketing; Rankings; Third Party Evaluations

Indexed keywords

EID: 0742323927     PISSN: 07322399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.22.4.437.24904     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Allenby, Greg M., Thomas S. Shively, Sha Yang, Mark J. Garratt. 2003. A choice model for packaged goods: Dealing with discrete quantities and quantity discounts. Marketing Sci. Forthcoming.
2. Armstrong, J. S., Tad Sperry. 1994. The ombudsman: Business school prestige - Research versus teaching. Interfaces 24(2) 13-43.
3. Banerjee, B., Subir Bandyopadhyay. 2003. Advertising competition under consumer inertia. Marketing Sci. 22(1) 131-144.
4. Baumgartner, H., Rik Pieters. 2003. The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the disciplines and its subareas over time. J. Marketing 67(2) 123-139.
5. Eliashberg, Jehoshua, Steven M. Shugan. 1997. "Film critics: Influencers or predictors?" J. Marketing 61(2) 68-78.
6. Chatterjee, P., Donna L. Hoffman, Thomas P. Novak. 2003. Modeling the clickstream: Implications for Web-based advertising efforts. Marketing Sci. 22(4) 520-541.
7. Danaher, Peter J., Isaac W. Wilson, Robert Davis. 2003. A comparison of online and offline consumer brand loyalty. Marketing Sci. 22(4) 461-476.
8. Hovav, Anat, Paul Gray. YEAR. Future penetration of academic electronic journals: Four scenarios. Information Systems Frontiers 4(2) 229-244.
9. Iyer, Ganesh, Amit Pazgal. 2003. Internet shopping agents: Virtual co-location and competition. Marketing Sci. 22(1) 85-96.
10. Kahn, Barbara E., Mary Frances Luce. Understanding high-stakes consumer decisions: Mammography adherence following false alarm test results. Marketing Sci. 22 (3) 393-410.
11. MacRoberts, Michael H., Barbara R. MacRoberts, 1989. Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. J. Amer. Soc. Information Sci. 40(5) 342-349.
12. Rao, Akshay R., Humaira Mahi. 2003. The price of launching a ew product: Empirical evidence on factors affecting the relative magnitude of slotting allowances. Marketing Sci. 22(2) 246-268.
13. Rossi, Peter E., Greg M. Allenby. 2003. Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Sci. 22(3) 304-328.
14. Schatz, Martin. 1993. What's wrong with MBA ranking surveys? Management Res. News 16(7) 15-18.
15. Shugan, Steven M. 2003. Defining interesting research problems. Marketing Sci. 22(1) 1-15.
16. Slagell, J. 2001. The good, the bad, and the ugly: Evaluating electronic journals. Comput. Libraries 21(5). 34-38.
17. Swait, Joffre, Rick L. Andrews. 2003. Enriching scanner panel models with choice experiments. Marketing Sci. 22(4) 442-460.
18. Tellis, Gerard J., Stefan Stremersch, Eden Yin. 2003. The international takeoff of new products: The role of economics, culture and country innovativeness. Marketing Sci. 22(2) 188-208.
19. Toubia, Olivier, Duncan I. Simester, John R. Hauser, Ely Dahan. 2003. Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. 22(3) 273-303.
20. Tracy, Joseph, Joel Waldfogel. 1997. The best business schools: A market-based approach. J. Bus. 70(1) 1-31.
21. Trieschmann, James S., Alan R. Dennis, Gregory B. Northcraft, Albert W. Niemi, Jr. 2000. Serving multiple constituencies in business schools: M.B.A. program versus research performance. Acad. Management J. 43(6) 1130-1141.
22. Vastag, Gyula, Frank Montabon. 2002. Journal characteristics, rankings and social acculturation in operations management. Omega 30(2) 109-126.
23. Zell, Deone. 2001. The market-driven business school: Has the pendulum swung too far? J. Management Inquiry 10(4) 324-338.