Journal rankings: Does one size fit all?

Australasian Marketing Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 64-66

  Polonsky, Michael J ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844549475     PISSN: 14413582     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1441-3582(04)70099-3     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Cheng L.T.W., Chan K.C., Chan R.Y.K. Publications in major marketing journals: An analysis of research productivity of Asia-Pacific universities. Journal of Marketing Education 2003, 25(2):163-176.
2. DocSig (2004) Who went where & salary survey 2004. Marketing Doctorial Students SIG Accessed September 2004. http://docsig.eci.gsu.edu/www2004.pdf.
3. Easton G., Easton D.M. Marketing journals and the research assessment exercise. Journal of Marketing Management 2003, 19(1/2):5-25.
4. Hawes J.M., Keiller B. Assessing marketing journals: A mission-based approach. Journal of the Academy of Business Education 2002, 3(2):70-86.
5. Mort G.S., McColl-Kennedy J.R., Kiel G., Soutar G.N. Perceptions of marketing journals by senior academics in Australia and New Zealand. Australasian Marketing Journal 2004, 12(2):51-61.
6. Polonsky M.J., Jones G., Kearsley M.J. Accessibility: An alternative method of ranking marketing journals?. Journal of Marketing Education 1999, 21(3):181-193.
7. Polonsky M.J., Juric B., Mankelow G. Attitudes about work practices, time allocation and publication output: Profiles of U.S. marketing academics. Journal of Marketing Education 2003, 25(4):218-230.
8. Polonsky M.J, Whitelaw P. What are we really evaluating when we rank journals - comparisons of views. Proceedings of ANZMAC 2003, University of South Australia 2003, 1374-1380.
9. Theorharakis V., Hirst V. Perceptual differences of marketing journals: A worldwide perspective. Marketing Letters 2002, 13(4):389-402.