Retrospective docking study of PDE4B ligands and an analysis of the behavior of selected scoring functions

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1061-1074

  Mpamhanga, Chidochangu P ^a   Chen, Beining ^a   McLay, Iain M ^b   Ormsby, Daniel L ^c   Lindvall, Mika K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

^c Accelrys Limited UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DOCKING; PROTEINS; SCREENING; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

BIOLOGICAL SCREENING; LIGANDS; SCORING FUNCTIONS; VIRTUAL SCREENING STRATEGIES;

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

3',5' CYCLIC NUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHODIESTERASE; LIGAND; PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITOR; PHOSPHODIESTERASE IV;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DRUG ANTAGONISM; FORECASTING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN BINDING; RESEARCH; STATISTICS;

3',5'-CYCLIC-NUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHODIESTERASE; ALGORITHMS; FORECASTING; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PHOSPHODIESTERASE INHIBITORS; PROTEIN BINDING; RESEARCH;

EID: 23844468897     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci050044x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Kuntz, I. D. Structure-Based Strategies For Drug Design And Discovery. Science 1992, 257, 1078-1082.
2. Diller, D. J.; Merz, K. M., Jr. High-Throughput Docking For Library Design And Library Prioritization. Proteins 2001, 43, 113-124.
3. Joseph-McCarthy, D. Computational Approaches To Structure-Based Ligand Design. Pharmacol. Therapeut. 1999, 84, 179-191.
4. Gund, P. In Pharmacophore Perception, Development, and Drug Design; Gunner, O. F., Ed.; International University Line: California, U.S.A., 2000; Chapter 1, pp 3-11.
5. Ewing, T. J. A.; Kuntz, I. D. Critical Evaluation Of Search Algorithms For Automated Molecular Docking And Database Screening. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1175-1189.
6. Halperin, I.; Ma, B.; Wolfson, H.; Nussinov, R. Principles Of Docking: An Overview Of Search Algorithms And A Guide To Scoring Functions. Proteins 2002, 47, 409-443.
7. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development And Validation Of A Genetic Algorithm For Flexible Docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
8. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated Docking Using A Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm And Empirical Binding Free Energy Function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662.
9. McMartin, C.; Bohacek, R. S. QXP: Powerful, Rapid Computer Algorithms For Structure-Based Drug Design, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 333-344.
10. Budin, N.; Majeux, N.; Caflisch, A. Fragment-Based Flexible Ligand Docking By Evolutionary Optimization. Biol. Chem. 2001, 382, 1365-1372.
11. Goodsell, D. S.; Olson, A. J. Automated Docking Of Substrates To Proteins By Simulated Annealing. Proteins 1990, 8, 195-202.
12. Liu, M.; Wang, S. MCDOCK: A Monte Carlo Simulation Approach To The Molecular Docking Problem. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1999, 13, 435-451.
13. Leach, A. R.; Smellie, A. S. A. combined model-building and distance-geometry approach to automated conformational analysis and search. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 379-385.
14. Venkatachalam, C. M.; Jiang, X.; Oldfield, T.; Waldman, M. LigandFit: A Novel Method For The Shape-Directed Rapid Docking Of Ligands To Protein Active Sites. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2002, 21, 289-307.
15. Kuntz, I. D.; Blaney, J. M.; Oatley, S. J.; Langridge, R.; Ferrin, T. E. A Geometric Approach To Macromolecule Ligand Interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 161, 269-288.
16. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe. G. A. Fast Flexible Docking Method Using An Incremental Construction Algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 261, 470-489.
17. Welch, W.; Rupert, J.; JAIN, A. N. Hammerhead: Fast, Full Automated Docking Of Flexible Ligands To Protein Binding Sites. J. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 449-489.
18. Ewing, T. J. A.; Kuntz, I. D. Critical Evaluation Of Search Algorithms For Automated Molecular Docking And Database Screening. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1175-1189
19. Ajay A. J.; Murcko, M. A. Computational Methods To Predict Binding Free Energy In Ligand - Receptor Complexes. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4953-4967.
20. Bohm, H.; Stahl, M. In Reviews in Computational Chemistry; Lipkowitz, K. B., Boyd, D. B., Eds.; Indiana University-Purdue University and Wiley-VCH: Hoboken, 2002; Vol. 18, Chapter 2, pp 41-87.
21. Gehlhaar, D. K.; Verkhivker, G. M.; Rejto, P. A.; Sherman, C. J.; Fogel, D. B.; Fogel, L. J.; Freer, S. T. Molecular Recognition Of The Inhibitor AG-1343 By HIV-1 protease: Conformational Flexible Docking By Evolutionary Programming. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 317-324.
22. Böhm, H. J. The Computer Program LUDI: A New Method For The De Novo Design Of Enzyme Inhibitors. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1992, 6, 61-78.
23. Jain, A. N. Scoring Noncovalent Protein - Ligand Interactions: A Continuous Differentiable Function Tuned To Compute Binding Affinities. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 427-440.
24. Muegge, I.; Martin, Y. C.; Hajduk, P. J.; Fesik S. W. Evaluation Of PMF Scoring In Docking Weak Ligands To The FK506 Binding Protein. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 2498-503.
25. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Knowledge-based Scoring Function to Predict Protein-Ligand Interactions. J. Mol Biol 2000, 295, 337-356.
26. Tame, J. R. H.; Scoring Functions: A View from the Bench. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1999, 13, 99-109.
27. Bissantz, C.; Folkers, G.; Rognan, D. Protein-Based Virtual Screening Of Chemical Databases. 1. Evaluation Of Different Docking/Scoring Combinations. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4759-4767.
28. Stahl, M.; Rarey, M. Detailed Analysis of Scoring Functions for Virtual Screening. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1035-1042.
29. Wang, R.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. Comparative Evaluation Of 11 Scoring Functions For Molecular Docking. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 2287-2302.
30. Allen, D. G.; Coe, D. M.; Cook, C. M.; Dowle, M. D.; Edlin, C. D.; Hamblin, J. N.; Johnson, M. R.; Jones, P. S.; Knowles, R. G.; Lindvall, M. K.; Mitchell, C. J.; Redgrave, A. J.; Trivedi, N.; Ward, P. Pyrazolo-[3,4-B]Pyridine Compounds, And Their Use As Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors. PCT Int. Appl. 2004, 293.
31. Raboisson, P.; Lugnier, C; Muller, C.; Reimund, J.; Schultz, D.; Pinna, G.; Le Bec, A.; Basaran, H.; Desaubry, L.; Gaudiot, P.; Seloum, M.; Bourguignon J. Design, Synthesis And Structure/Activity Relationships Of A Series Of 9-Substituted Adenine Derivatives As Selective Phosphodiesterase Type-4 Inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 38, 199-214.
32. Daylight, [Online]; http://www.daylight.com
33. Tripos, [Online]; http://www.tripos.com.
34. Accelrys, [Online]; http://www.accelrys.com.
35. Verkhivker, G. M.; Bouzida, D.; Gehlhaar, D. K.; Rejto, P. A.; Arthurs, S.; Colson, A. B.; Freer, S. T.; Larson, V.; Luty, B. A.; Marrone, T.; Rose P. W. Deciphering Common Failures In Molecular Docking Of Ligand-Protein Complexes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 731-751.
36. Verdonk, M. L.; Berdini, V.; Hartshorn, M. J.; Mooij, W. T. M.; Murray, C. W.; Taylor, R. D.; Watson, P. Virtual Screening Using Protein - Ligand Docking: Avoiding Artificial Enrichment. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 793-806.
37. Verdonk, M. L.; Cole, J. C.; Hartshorn M. J.; Murray, C. W.; Taylor, R. D. Improved Protein - Ligand Docking Using GOLD. Proteins 2003, 52, 609-623.
38. Pearlman, D. A.; Charifson, P. S. Are Free Energy Calculations Useful In Practice? A Comparison With Rapid Scoring Functions For The P38 MAP Kinase Protein System. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3417-3423.
39. Charifson, P. S.; Corkery, J. J.; Murcko, M. A. Walters, W. P. Consensus Scoring: A Method For Obtaining Improved Hit Rates From Docking Databases Of Three-Dimensional Structures Into Proteins. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5100-5109.