Pollen removal, paternity, and the male function of flowers

American Naturalist

Volumn 149, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 585-594

  Queller, David ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000836341     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/286007     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
2. Arnold, S. J. 1994. Bateman's principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. American Naturalist 144:S126-S149.
3. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection. Evolution 38:709-719.
4. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
5. Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 224:223-265.
6. Broyles, S. B., and R. Wyatt. 1990a. Paternity analysis in a natural population of Asclepias exaltata: multiple paternity, functional gender, and the "pollen-donation hypothesis." Evolution 44: 1454-1468.
7. _1990b. Plant parenthood in milkweeds: a direct test of the pollen donation hypothesis. Plant Species Biology 5:131-142.
8. _1991. Effective pollen dispersal in a natural population of Asclepias exaltata: the influence of pollinator behavior, genetic similarity, and mating success. American Naturalist 138: 1239-1249.
9. _1993. The consequences of self-pollination in Asclepias exaltata: the influence of pollinator behavior, genetic similarity, and mating success. American Journal of Botany 80:41-44.
10. _1995. A reexamination of the pollen-donation hypothesis in an experimental population of Asclepias exaltata. Evolution 49:89-99.
11. Broyles, S. B., A. Schnabel, and R. Wyatt. 1994. Evidence for long-distance pollen dispersal in milkweeds (Asclepias exaltata). Evolution 48:1032-1040.
12. Burd, M. 1995. Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation. Botanical Review 60:83-139.
13. Chaplin, S. J., and J. L. Walker 1982. Energetic constraints and adaptive significance of the floral display of a forest milkweed. Ecology 63:1857-1870.
14. Charnov, E. L. 1979. Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 76:2480-2484.
15. Cruzan, M. B., P. R. Neal, and M. F. Willson. 1988. Floral display in Phyla incisa: consequences for male and female reproductive success. Evolution 42:505-515.
16. deJong, T. J., N. M. Waser, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1993. Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8:321-325.
17. Devlin, B., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1990. Male and female fertility variation in wild radish, a hermaphrodite. American Naturalist 37:87-107.
18. Haig, D., and M. Westoby. 1988. On limits to seed production. American Naturalist 131:757-759.
19. Harder, L. D., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1995. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature (London) 373:512-515.
20. Harder, L. D., and J. D. Thomson. 1989. Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants. American Naturalist 133:323-344.
21. Meagher, T. R. 1991. Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. II. Patterns of male reproductive success. American Naturalist 137:738-752.
22. Mitchell, R. J. 1993. Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: observation and experiment in the field. Evolution 47:25-35.
23. Morse, D. H., and R. S. Fritz. 1983. Contribution of diurnal and nocturnal insects to the pollination of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) in a pollen-limited system. Oecologia (Berlin) 60:190-197.
24. Pleasants, J. M., and S. J. Chaplin. 1983. Nectar production rates of Asclepias quadrifolia: causes and consequences of individual variation. Oecologia (Berlin) 59:232-238.
25. Queller, D. C. 1983. Sexual selection in a hermaphroditic plant. Nature (London) 305:706-707.
26. _1985. Proximate and ultimate causes of low fruit production in Asclepias exaltata. Oikos 44: 373-389.
27. Stanton, M. L., A. A. Snow, and S. N. Handel. 1986. Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness. Science (Washington, D.C.) 232:1625-1627.
28. Stephenson, A. G. 1981. Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12:253-279.
29. Sutherland, S. 1987. Why hermaphroditic plants produce many more flowers than fruits: experimental tests with Agave mickelveyana. Evolution 41:750-759.
30. Sutherland, S., and L. F. Delph. 1984. On the importance of male fitness in plants: patterns of fruit set. Ecology 65:1093-1104.
31. Willson, M. F. 1979. Sexual selection in plants. American Naturalist 113:777-790.
32. _1994. Sexual selection in plants: perspective and overview. American Naturalist 144:S13-S39.
33. Willson, M. F., and R. I. Bertin. 1979. Flower visitors, nectar production and inflorescence size of Asclepias syriaca. Canadian Journal of Botany 57:1380-1388.
34. Willson, M. F., and N. Burley. 1983. Mate choice in plants: tactics, mechanisms, and consequences. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
35. Willson, M. F., and P. W. Price. 1977. The evolution of inflorescence size in Asclepias (Asclepiadaceae). Evolution 31:495-511.
36. Willson, M. F., and B. J. Rathcke. 1974. Adaptive design of the floral display of Asclepias syriaca. American Midland Naturalist 92:47-57.
37. Wilson, P., J. D. Thomson, M. L. Stanton, and L. P. Rigney. 1994. Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination. American Naturalist 143:283-296.