Indirect consequences of artificial selection on plasticity to light quality in Arabidopsis thaliana

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1403-1415

  Callahan, H S ^a   Pigliucci, M ^b  

^a Barnard College of Columbia University   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive phenotypic plasticity; Arabidopsis thaliana; Artificial selection; Brassicaceae; Flowering time; Photoperiod; Red to far red ratio (R : FR)

Indexed keywords

PLASTICITY;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS BREEDING; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; LIGHT; PHENOTYPE; PHOTOPERIODICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION;

ARABIDOPSIS; CROSSES, GENETIC; EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; LIGHT; PHENOTYPE; PHOTOPERIOD; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS);

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; BRASSICACEAE;

EID: 22844441276     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00963.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abbott, R.J. & Gomes, M.F. 1989. Population genetic structure and outcrossing rate of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Heredity 62: 411-418.
2. Bell, G. & Lechowicz, M.J. 1994. Spatial heterogeneity at small scales and how plants respond to it. In: Exploitation Of Environmental Heterogeneity By Plants (M. M. Caldwell & R. W. Pearcy, eds), pp. 391-414. Academic Press, San Diego.
3. Bergelson, J., Purrington, C. & Wichmann, G. 1998a. Promiscuity in transgenic plants. Nature 395: 6697.
4. Bergelson, J., Stahl, E., Dudek, S. & Kreitman, M. 1998b. Genetic variation within and among populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 148: 1311-1323.
5. Bochdanovits, Z. & de Jong, G. 2003. Experimental evolution in Drosophila melanogaster: interaction of temperature and food quality selection regimes. Evolution 57: 1829-1836.
6. Bochdanovits, Z., van der Klis, H. & de Jong, G. 2003. Covariation of larval gene expression and adult body size in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 1760-1766.
7. Botto, J.F. & Smith, H. 2002. Differential genetic variation in adaptive strategies to a common environmental signal in Arabidopsis accessions: phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance. Plant Cell Environ 25: 53-63.
8. Bradshaw, A.D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Genet. 13: 115-155.
9. Brakefield, P.M. 2003. Artificial selection and the development of ecologically relevant phenotypes. Ecology 84: 1661-1671.
10. Breyne, P., Rombaut, D., Van Gysel, A., Van Montagu, M. & Gerats, T. 1999. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity within and between Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 261: 627-634.
11. Brumpton, R.J., Boughey, H. & Jinks, J.L. 1977. Joint selection for both extremes of mean performance and of sensitivity to a macroenvironmental variable 1. Family selection. Heredity 38: 219-226.
12. Callahan, H.S., Dhanoolal, N. & Ungerer, M.C. 2005. Plasticity genes and plasticity costs: a new approach using an Arabidopsis recombinant inbred population. N. Phytol. 166: 129-139.
13. Callahan, H.S. & Pigliucci, M. 2002. Shade-induced plasticity and its ecological significance in wild populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 83: 1965-1980.
14. Camara, M.D., Ancell, C.A. & Pigliucci, M. 2000. Induced mutations: a novel tool to study phenotypic integration and evolutionary constraints in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2: 1009-1029.
15. Clauss, M.J., Cobban, H. & Mitchell-Olds, T. 2002. Cross-species microsatellite markers for elucidating population genetic structure in Arabidopsis and Arabis (Brassicaeae). Mol. Ecol. 11: 591-601.
16. Davidowitz, G., D'Amico, L.J. & Nijhout, H.F. 2003. Critical weight in the development of insect body size. Evol. Dev. 5: 188-197.
17. DeWitt, T.J., Robinson, B.W. & Wilson, D.S. 2000. Functional diversity among predators of a freshwater snail imposes an adaptive trade-off for shell morphology. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2: 129-148.
18. Dixon, P., Weinig, C. & Schmitt, J. 2001. Susceptibility to UV damage in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae): testing for opportunity costs to shade-avoidance and population differentiation. Am. J. Bot. 88: 1401-1408.
19. Dorn, L.A., Pyle, E.H. & Schmitt, J. 2000. Plasticity to light cues and resources in Arabidopsis thaliana: testing for adaptive value and costs. Evolution 54: 1982-1994.
20. Falconer, D.S. 1990. Selection in different environments: Effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance. Genet. Res. 56: 57-70.
21. Fischer, M., Van Kleunen, M. & Schmid, B. 2004. Experimental life-history evolution: selection on growth form and its plasticity in a clonal plant. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 331-341.
22. Hill, W.G. & Caballero, A. 1992. Artificial selection experiments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 287-310.
23. Hoffmann, M.H., Bremer, M., Schneider, K., Burger, F., Stolle, E. & Moritz, G. 2003. Flower visitors in a natural population of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Biol. 5: 491-494.
24. Huber, H., Kane, N.C., Heschel, M.S., von Wettberg, E.J., Banta, J., Leuck, A.M. & Schmitt, J. 2004. Frequency and microenvironmental pattern of selection on plastic shade-avoidance traits in a natural population of Impatiens capensis. Am. Nat. 163: 548-563.
25. Jørgensen, S. & Mauricio, R. 2004. Neutral genetic variation among wild North American populations of the weedy plant Arabidopsis thaliana is not geographically structured. Mol. Ecol. 13: 3403-3413.
26. Klejnot, J. & Lin, C.T. 2004. A CONSTANS experience brought to light. Science 303: 965-966.
27. Koornneef, M., Hanhart, C.J. & Veen, J.H.V.D. 1991. A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 229: 57-66.
28. Kuittinen, H., Mattila, A. & Savolainen, O. 1997. Genetic variation at marker loci and in quantitative traits in natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 79: 144-152.
29. Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. & Wolfinger, R.D. 1996. SAS System For Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
30. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics And Analysis Of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.
31. Mackay, T.F.C., Fry, J.D., Lyman, R.F. & Nuzhdin, S.V. 1994. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster - estimates from response to selection of inbred strains. Genetics 136: 937-951.
32. Mauricio, R. 1998. Costs of resistance to natural enemies in field populations of the annual plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Am. Nat. 151: 20-28.
33. Mitchell-Olds, T. 1996. Genetic constraints on life-history evolution: Quantitative-trait loci influencing growth and flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 50: 140-145.
34. Munir, J., Dorn, L.A., Donohue, K. & Schmitt, J. 2001. The effect of maternal photoperiod on seasonal dormancy in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88: 1240-1249.
35. Pigliucci, M. 2001. Phenotypic Plasticity; Beyond Nature and Nurture. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
36. Pigliucci, M. 2002. Ecology and evolutionary biology of Arabidopsis. In: The Arabidopsis Book (C. R. Somerville & E. M. Meyerowitz, eds), pp. 1-20. [WWW document]. URL http://www.aspb.org/publications/arabidopsis.
37. Pigliucci, M. 2003. Selection in a model system: Ecological genetics of flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 84: 1700-1712.
38. Pigliucci, M., Pollard, H. & Cruzan, M.B. 2003. Comparative studies of evolutionary responses to light environment in Arabidopsis. Am. Nat. 161: 68-82.
39. Putterill, J., Laurie, R. & Macknight, R. 2004. It's time to flower: the genetic control of flowering time. Bioessays 26: 363-373.
40. Relyea, R.A. 2001. The lasting effects of adaptive plasticity: predator-induced tadpoles become long-legged frogs. Ecology 82: 1947-1955.
41. Relyea, R.A. 2003. How prey respond to combined predators: a review and an empirical test. Ecology 84: 1827-1839.
42. Relyea, R.A. 2004. Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85: 172-179.
43. Roff, D.A. & Preziosi, R. 1994. The estimation of the genetic correlation - the use of the jackknife. Heredity 73: 544-548.
44. SAS Institute Inc., V. 1999. SAS/STAT. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
45. Scheiner, S.M. 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 35-68.
46. Scheiner, S.M. 2002. Selection experiments and the study of phenotypic plasticity. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 889-898.
47. Scheiner, S.M. & Callahan, H.S. 1999. Measuring natural selection on phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 53: 1704-1713.
48. Scheiner, S.M. & Lyman, R.F. 1989. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity I. Heritability. J. Evol. Biol. 2: 95-107.
49. Scheiner, S.M. & Lyman, R.F. 1991. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. II. Response to selection. J. Evol. Biol. 4: 23-50.
50. Schlichting, C.D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 667-693.
51. Schmitt, J., Stinchcombe, J.R., Heschel, M.S. & Huber, H. 2003. The adaptive evolution of plasticity: phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance responses. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43: 459-469.
52. Shaw, R.G., Byers, D.L. & Darmo, E. 2000. Spontaneous mutational effects of reproductive traits of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 155: 369-378.
53. Simpson, G.G. & Dean, C. 2002. Arabidopsis, the Rosetta stone of flowering time? Science 296: 285-289.
54. Snape, J. & Lawrence, M. 1971. The breeding system of Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 27: 299-302.
55. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
56. Stinchcombe, J.R., Weinig, C., Ungerer, M., Olsen, K.M., Mays, C., Halldorsdottir, S.S., Purugganan, M.D. & Schmitt, J. 2004. A latitudinal cline in flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana modulated by the flowering time gene FRIGIDA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101: 4712-4717.
57. Valverde, F., Mouradov, A., Soppe, W., Ravenscroft, D., Samach, A. & Coupland, G. 2004. Photoreceptor regulation of CONSTANS protein in photoperiodic flowering. Science 303: 1003-1006.
58. van Kleunen, M., Fischer, M. & Schmid, B. 2002. Experimental life-history evolution: selection on the allocation to sexual reproduction and its plasticity in a clonal plant. Evolution 56: 2168-2177.
59. 2 a selective agent on model C3 annuals? Oecologia 123: 330-341.
60. Weinig, C. 2002. Phytochrome photoreceptors mediate plasticity to light quality in flowers of the Brassicaceae. Am. J. Bot. 89: 230-235.
61. Weinig, C. & Delph, L.F. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity early in life constrains developmental responses later. Evolution 55: 930-936.
62. Wijngaarden, P.J. & Brakefield, P.M. 2001. Lack of response to artificial selection on the slope of reaction norms for seasonal polyphenism in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Heredity 87: 410-420.
63. Willis, J.H. 1996. Measures of phenotypic selection are biased by partial inbreeding. Evolution 50: 1501-1511.
64. Windig, J.J. 1997. The calculation and significance testing of genetic correlations across environments. J. Evol. Biol. 10: 853-874.
65. Windig, J.J., De Kovel, C.G.F. & De Jong, G. 2004. Genetics and mechanics of plasticity. In: Phenotypic Plasticity (S. M. Scheiner & T. J. De Witt, eds), pp. 31-49. Oxford University Press, New York.
66. Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.