Experimental evolution in Drosophila melanogaster: Interaction of temperature and food quality selection regimes

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1829-1836

  Bochdanovits, Zoltán ^a   De Jong, Gerdien ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Body size evolution; Drosophila melanogaster; Experimental evolution; Larval resource processing; Thermal evolution

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; EVOLUTION; FOOD QUALITY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PHENOTYPE; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

ANIMALIA; DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILIDAE; INVERTEBRATA; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 0043286732     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00590.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Atkinson, D., and R. M. Sibly. 1997. Why Are Organisms Usually Bigger in Colder Environments - Making Sense of a Life-History Puzzle. TREE. 12:235-239.
2. Bakker, K. 1961. An analysis of factors which determine success in competition for food amongst larvae of Drosophila melanogaster. Arch. Neerl. Zool. 14:200-281.
3. Bochdanovits, Z., and G. de Jong. 2003. Temperature-dependent larval resource allocation shaping adult body size in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. In press.
4. Borash, D. J., H. Teotonio, M. R. Rose, and L. D. Mueller. 2000. Density-dependent natural selection in Drosophila: correlations between feeding rate, development time and viability. J. Evol. Biol. 13:181-187.
5. Botella, L. M., A. Moya, C. Gonzáles, and J. L. Ménsua. 1985. Larval stop, delayed development and survival in overcrowded cultures of Drosophila melanogaster: effects of urea and uric acid. J. Insect Physiol. 31:179-185.
6. Cavicchi, S., D. Guerra, V. Natali, C. Pezzoli, and G. Giorgi. 1989. Temperature-related divergence in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster. II Correlation between fitness and body dimensions. J. Evol. Biol. 2:235-251.
7. Chippindale, A. K., A. G. Gibbs, M. Sheik, K. J. Yee, M. Djawdan, T. J. Bradley, and M. R. Rose. 1998. Resource acquisition and the evolution of stress resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 52:1342-1352.
8. Coggan, R. 1997. Growth:Ration relationships in the antarctic fish Notothenia coriiceps Richardson maintained under different conditions of temperature and photoperiod. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 210:23-35.
9. De Moed, G. H., G. de Jong, and W. Scharloo. 1998. The energetics of growth in Drosophila melanogaster: Effect of temperature and food conditions. Neth. J. Zool. 48:169-188.
10. Gebhardt, M. D., and S. C. Stearns. 1988. Reaction norms for developmental time and weight at eclosion in Drosophila mercatorum. J. Evol. Biol. 1:335-354.
11. Gerhard, G. S. 2001. Caloric restriction in nonmammalian models. J. Anti-Ageing. Med. 4:205-213.
12. Huey, R. B., L. Partridge, and K. Fowler. 1991. Thermal sensitivity of Drosophila melanogaster responds rapidly to laboratory natural selection. Evolution 45:751-756.
13. Joshi, A. 1997. Laboratory studies of density-dependent selection: Adaptations to crowding in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Sci. 72:555-562.
14. Joshi, A., and L. D. Mueller. 1996. Density-dependent natural selection in Drosophila: Trade-offs between larval food acquisition and utilization. Evol. Ecol. 10:463-474.
15. McCabe, J., and L. Partridge. 1997. An interaction between environmental temperature and genetic variation for body size for the fitness of adult female Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 51:1164-1174.
16. Neat, F., K. Fowler, V. French, and L. Partridge. 1995. Thermal evolution of growth efficiency in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 260:73-78.
17. Nunney, L., and W. Cheung. 1997. The effect of temperature on body size and fecundity in female Drosophila melanogaster: Evidence for adaptive plasticity. Evolution 51:1529-1535.
18. Ohnishi, S. 1979. Relationship Between Larval Behaviour and Viability in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Behav. Genet. 9:129-134.
19. Partridge, L., B. Barrie, K. Fowler, and V. French. 1994. Thermal evolution of pre-adult life history traits in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 7:645-663.
20. Partridge, L., B. Barrie, N. H. Barton, K. Fowler, and V. French. 1995. Rapid laboratory evolution of adult life-history traits in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 49:538-544.
21. Reeve, M. W., K. Fowler, and L. Partridge. 2000. Increased body size confers greater fitness at lower experimental temperature in male Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 13:836-844.
22. Robinson, S. J. W., and L. Partridge. 2001. Temperature and clinal variation in larval growth efficiency in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 14:14-21.
23. Robinson, S. J. W., B. Zwaan, and L. Partridge. 2000. Starvation resistance and adult body composition in a latitudinal cline of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 54:1819-1824.
24. Ruiz-Dubreuil, G., B. Burnet, K. Connolly, and P. Furness. 1996. Larval foraging behaviour and competition in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 76:55-64.
25. Santos, M., D. J. Borash, A. Joshi, N. Bounlutay, and L. D. Mueller. 1997. Density-dependent natural selection in Drosophila: Evolution of growth rate and body size. Evolution 51:420-432.
26. Sewell, D., B. Burnet, and K. Connolly. 1975. Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 24:163-173.
27. Simmons, F. H., and T. J. Bradley. 1997. An analysis of resource allocation in response to dietary yeast in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 43:779-788.
28. Stevens, D. J., M. H. Hansell, J. A. Freel, and P. Monaghan. 1999. Developmental trade-offs in caddis flies: increased investment in larval defence alters adult resource allocation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266:1049-1054.
29. Stevens, D. J., M. H. Hansell, and P. Monaghan. 2000. Developmental trade-offs and life histories: strategic allocation of resources in caddis flies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 267:1511-1515.
30. van 't Land, J., P, van Putten, B. Zwaan, A. Kamping, and van Delden. 1999. Latitudinal variation in wild populations of Drosophila melanogaster: Heritabilities and reaction norms. J. Evol. Biol. 12:222-232.
31. Zamudio, K. R., R. B. Huey, and W. D. Crill. 1995. Bigger isn't always better - Body-size, developmental and parental temperature and male territorial success in Drosophila-melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 49:671-677.