Artificial selection and the development of ecologically relevant phenotypes

Ecology

Volumn 84, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1661-1671

  Brakefield, Paul M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adaptive evolution; Artificial selection; Development; Evolutionary constraints; Genetic variances; Life history; Morphology; Natural selection; Phenotypic plasticity

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIATION; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SELECTION; SELECTIVE BREEDING;

EID: 0344153484     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1661:ASATDO]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Antonovics, J., and P. H. van Tienderen. 1991. Ontoecogenophyloconstraints? The chaos of constraint terminology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6:166-168.
2. Arthur, W. 2002. The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology. Nature 415:757-764.
3. Barton, N., and L. Partridge. 2000. Limits to natural selection. BioEssays 22:1075-1084.
4. Beldade, P., and P. M. Brakefield. 2002. The genetics and evo-devo of butterfly wing patterns. Nature Review Genetics 3:442-452.
5. Beldade, P., P. M. Brakefield, and A. D. Long. 2002a. Contribution of Distal-less to quantitative variation in butterfly eyespots. Nature 415:315-318.
6. Beldade, P., K. Koops, and P. M. Brakefield. 2002b. Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution. Nature 416:844-847.
7. Boag, P. T., and A. J. van Noordwijk. 1987, Quantitative genetics. Pages 45-78 in F. Cooke and P. A. Buckley, editors. Avian genetics: a population and ecological approach. Academic Press, London, UK.
8. Bolker, J. A. 2000. Modularity in development and why it matters to evo-devo. American Zoologist 40:770-776.
9. Brakefield, P. M. 1997. Phenotypic plasticity and fluctuating asymmetry as responses to environmental stress in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Pages 65-78 in R. Bijlsma and V. Loeschcke, editors. Environmental stress, adaptation and evolution. Birkhauser-Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
10. Brakefield, P. M. 1998. The evolution-development interface and advances with the eyespots in Bicyclus butterflies. Heredity 80:265-272.
11. Brakefield, P. M., E. El Filali, R. van der Laan, C. J. Breuker, I. J. Saccheri, and B. Zwaan. 2001. Effective population size, reproductive success and sperm precedence in the butterfly, Bicyclus anynana, in captivity. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14:148-156.
12. Brakefield, P. M., and V. French. 1999. Butterfly wings: the evolution of development of colour patterns. BioEssays 21: 391-401.
13. Brakefield, P. M., J. Gates, D. Keys, F. Kesbeke, P. J. Wijngaarden, A. Monteiro, V. French, and S. B. Carroll. 1996. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly wing patterns. Nature 384:236-242.
14. Brakefield, P. M., F. Kesbeke, and P. B. Koch. 1998. The regulation of phenotypic plasticity of eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. American Naturalist 152:853-860.
15. Brakefield, P. M., and T. G. Liebert. 2000. Evolutionary dynamics of declining melanism in the peppered moth in The Netherlands. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, Series B Biological Sciences 267:1953-1957.
16. Brunetti, C., J. E. Selegue, A. Monteiro, V. French, P. M. Brakefield, and S. B. Carroll. 2001. The generation of diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns. Current Biology 11:1578-1585.
17. Carroll, S. B., J. K. Grenier, and S. D. Weatherbee. 2001. From DNA to diversity: molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design. Blackwell Science, Malden, Massachusetts, USA.
18. Charlesworth, B. 1990. Optimalization models, quantitative genetics, and mutation. Evolution 44:520-538.
19. Cheverud, J. 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology 110:155-171.
20. Cheverud, J. 1996. Developmental integration and the evolution of pleiotropy. American Zoologist 40:770-776.
21. Cook, L. M., R. L. H. Dennis, and G. S. Mani. 1999. Melanic morph frequency in the peppered moth in the Manchester area. Proceedings of the Royal Society London. Series B Biological Sciences 266:293-297.
22. de Jong, G., and A. J. van Noordwijk. 1992. Acquisition and allocation of resources: genetic (co)variances, selection and life histories. American Naturalist 139:749-770.
23. de Jong, P., and P. M. Brakefield. 1998. Climate and change in clines for melanism in the two-spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B Biological Sciences 265:39-43.
24. DeWitt, T. J., A. Sih, and D. S. Wilson. 1998. Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:77-81.
25. Donohue. K., E. H. Pyle, D. Messiqua, M. S. Heschel, and J. A. Schmitt. 2000. Density dependence and population differentiation of genetic architecture in Impatiens capensis in natural environments. Evolution 54:1969-1981.
26. Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
27. Etterson, J. R., and R. G. Shaw. 2001. Constraint to adaptive evolution in response to global warming. Science 294:151-154.
28. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Addison Wesley Longman, Essex, UK.
29. Fellowes, M. D. E., A. R. Kraaijeveld, and H. C. J. Godfray. 1999. Cross-resistance following artificial selection for increased defense against parasitoids in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 53:966-972.
30. Fischer, K., B. J. Zwaan, and P. M. Brakefield. 2002. How does egg size relate to body size in butterflies? Oecologia 131:375-379.
31. Fry, J. D. 2003. Detecting ecological trade-offs using selection experiments. Ecology 84:1672-1678.
32. Fryer, G., and T. D. Iles. 1972. The cichlid fishes of the Great Lakes of Africa: their biology and evolution. Oliver and Boyd, London, UK.
33. Garcia-Barros, E. 2000. Body size, egg size, and their interspecific relationships with ecological and life history traits in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionidea. Hesperioidea). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 70:251-284.
34. Grant, B., A. D. Cook, C. A. Clarke, and D. F. Owen. 1998. Geographic and temporal variation in the incidence of melanism in peppered moths in America and Britain. Journal of Heredity 89:465-471.
35. Grether, G. F. 1996. Sexual selection and survival selection on wing coloration and body size in the rubyspot damselfly Hetaerina americana. Evolution 50:1939-1948.
36. Hoffman, A. A. 2000. Laboratory and field heritabilities: some lessons from Drosophila. Pages 200-218 in T. A. Mousseau, B. Sinervo, and J. Endler, editors. Adaptive genetic variation in the wild. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
37. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195-204.
38. Karoly, K., and J. K. Conner. 2000. Heritable variation in a family-diagnostic trait. Evolution 54:1433-1438.
39. Kingsolver, J. G. 1996. Experimental manipulation of wing pigment pattern and survival in western white butterflies. American Naturalist 147:296-306.
40. Kingsolver, J. G. 1999. Experimental analyses of wing size, flight, and survival in the western white butterfly. Evolution 53:1479-1490.
41. Koch, P. B., P. M. Brakefield, and F. Kesbeke. 1996. Ecdysteroids control eyespot size and wing color pattern in the polyphenic butterfly Bicyclus anynana (Satyrinae). Journal of Insect Physiology 45:201-212.
42. Kraaijeveld, A. R., and H. C. J. Godfray. 1997: Trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 389:278-280.
43. Lack, D. 1947. Darwin's Finches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
44. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
45. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
46. Mackay, T. F. C. 2001. Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila. Nature Review Genetics 2:11-20.
47. Mauricio, R. 2001. Mapping quantitative trait loci in plants: uses and caveats for evolutionary biology. Nature Review Genetics 2:370-381.
48. Maynard-Smith, J., R. Burian, S. Kaufman, P. Alberch, J. Campbell, B. Goodwin, R. Lande, D. Raup, and L. Wolpert. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology 60:265-287.
49. Meyerowitz, E. M. 1994. The genetics of flower development. Scientific American 271:40-47.
50. Monteiro, A. F., P. M. Brakefield, and V. French. 1994. The evolutionary genetics and developmental basis of wing pattern variation in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Evolution 48:1147-1157.
51. Mousseau, T. A., B. Sinervo, and J. Endler. 2000. Adaptive genetic variation in the wild. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
52. Partridge, L., and D. Gems. 2002. Mechanisms of aging: public or private. Nature Review Genetics 3:165-175.
53. Peichel, C. L., K. S. Nereng, K. A. Ohgl, B. L. E. Cole, P. F. Colosimo, C. A. Buerkle, D. Schluter, and D. M. Kingsley. 2001. The genetic architecture of divergence between threespine stickleback species. Nature 414:901-905.
54. Pigliucci, M. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity beyond nature and nurture. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
55. Pigliucci, M., and J. Kaplan. 2000. The fall and rise of Dr. Pangloss: adaptationism and the Spandrels paper 20 years later. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:87-90.
56. Raff, R. 1996. The shape of life. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
57. Roff, D. A. 1997. Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
58. Roff, D. A., and M. A. DeRose. 2001. The evolution of trade-offs: effects of inbreeding on fecundity relationships in the cricket Gryllus firmus. Evolution 55:111-121.
59. Roskam, J. C., and P. M. Brakefield. 1996. A comparison of temperature-induced polyphenism in African Bicyclus butterflies from a seasonal savannah-rainforest ecotone. Evolution 50:2360-2372.
60. Roskam, J. C., and P. M. Brakefield. 1999. Seasonal polyphenism in Bicyclus (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) butterflies: different climates need different cues. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 66:345-356.
61. Scharloo, W. 1983. The effect of developmental constraints on selection response. Pages 197-210 in G. Vida and J. Maynard-Smith, editors. Organisational constraints on the dynamics of evolution. Manchester University Press, Manchester, UK.
62. Scheiner, S. M. 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 24: 35-68.
63. Scheiner, S. M., and R. F. Lyman. 1991. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. II. Response to selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 4:23-50.
64. Schemske, D. W., and H. D. Bradshaw, Jr. 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkey flowers (Mimulus). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 96:11910-11915.
65. Schlichting, C. D., and M. Pigliucci. 1998. Phenotypic evolution. A reaction norm perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
66. Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50:1766-1774.
67. Stearns, S. C. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
68. Steppan, S. J., P. C. Phillips, and D. Houle. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:320-327.
69. Stern, D. L. 1999. A role of Ultrabithorax in morphological differences between Drosophila species. Nature 396:463-466.
70. Stern, D. L. 2000. Perspective: evolutionary developmental biology and the problem of variation. Evolution 54:1079-1091.
71. Strauss, S. Y., J. A. Rudgers, J. A. Lau, and R. E. Irwin. 2002. Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:278-285.
72. Sucena, E., and D. L. Stern. 2000. Divergence of larval morphology between Drosophila sechellia and its sibling species caused by cis-regulatory evolution of ovo/shaven-baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 97:4530-4534.
73. Teotonio, H., and M. R. Rose. 2000. Variability in the reversibility of evolution. Nature 408:463-466.
74. Thomas, C. D., E. J. Bodsworth, R. J. Wilson, A. D. Simmons, Z. G. Davies, M. Musche, and L. Conradt. 2001. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 411:577-581.
75. Travisano, M., J. A. Mongold, A. F. Bennett, and R. E. Lenski. 1995. Experimental tests on the role of adaptation, chance and history in evolution. Science 267:87-90.
76. Wagner, G. P. 2001. The character concept in evolutionary biology. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
77. Wagner, G. P., and L. Altenberg. 1996. Perspective: complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50: 967-976.
78. Walther, G.-R., E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T. J. C. Beebee, J.-M. Fromentin, O. Hoegh-Guldberg, and F. Bairlein. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389-395.
79. Weber, K. E. 1992. How small are the smallest selectable domains of form? Genetics 130:345-353.
80. Westerbergh, A., and J. Doebley. 2002. Morphological traits defining species differences in wild relatives of maize are controlled by multiple quantitative trait loci. Evolution 56: 273-283.
81. Wijngaarden, P. J., and P. M. Brakefield. 2000. The genetic basis of eyespot size in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana: an analysis of line crosses. Heredity 87:410-420.
82. Wijngaarden, P. J., and P. M. Brakefield. 2001. Lack of response to artificial selection on the slope of reaction norms for seasonal polyphenism in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Heredity 87:410-420.
83. Wijngaarden, P. J., P. B. Koch, and P. M. Brakefield. 2002. Artificial selection on the shape of reaction norms for eyespot size in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana: direct and correlated responses. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15: 290-300.
84. Wilkins, A. S. 2002. The evolution of developmental pathways. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
85. Williamson, M. H. 1981. Island populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
86. Windig, J. J., P. M. Brakefield, N. Reitsma, and J. G. M. Wilson. 1994. Seasonal polyphenism in the wild: survey of wing patterns in five species of Bicyclus butterflies in Malawi. Ecological Entomology 19:285-298.