Measuring natural selection on phenotypic plasticity

Evolution

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1704-1713

  Scheiner, Samuel M ^a,b   Callahan, Hilary S ^c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WEST   (United States)

^b NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana; Flowering; Natural selection; Path analysis; Phenotypic plasticity; Reaction norm

Indexed keywords

HETEROGENEITY; MEASUREMENT METHOD; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SPATIAL VARIATION;

EID: 0033403582     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04555.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Cook, S. A., and M. J. Johnson. 1968. Adaptation to heterogenous environments. I. Variation in heterophylly in Ranunculus flammula L. Evolution 22:496-516.
2. Crespi, B. J., and F. L. Bookstein. 1989. A path-analytic model for the measurement of selection on morphology. Evolution 43:18-28.
3. Dudley, S. A. 1996a. Differing selection on plant physiological traits in response to environmental water availability: a test of adaptive hypotheses. Evolution 50:92-102.
4. _. 1996b. The response to differing selection on plant physiological traits: evidence for local adaptation. Evolution 50:103-110.
5. Dudley, S. A., and J. Schmitt. 1996. Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: density-dependent selection on manipulated stem length in Impatiens capensis. Am. Nat. 147:445-465.
6. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
7. Fox, C. W. 1997. The ecology of body size in a seed beetle, Stator limbatus: persistence of environmental variation across generations? Evolution 51:1005-1010.
8. Fox, C. W., and T. A. Mousseau. 1998. Maternal effects as adaptations for transgenerational phenotypic plasticity in insects. Pp. 159-177. in T. A. Mousseau and C. A. Fox, eds. Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
9. Gilbert, P., B. Moreteau, J. R. David, and S. M. Scheiner. 1998. Describing the evolution of reaction norm shape: body pigmentation in Drosophila. Evolution 52:1501-1506.
10. Gomulkiewicz, R., and M. Kirkpatrick. 1992. Quantitative genetics and the evolution of reaction norms. Evolution 46:390-411.
11. Halliday, K. J., M. Koornneef, and G. C. Whitelam. 1994. Phytochrome B and at least one other phytochrome mediate the accelerated flowering response of Arabidopsis thaliana L. to lowred/far-red ratio. Plant Physiol. 104:1311-1315.
12. Kingsolver, J. G. 1995. Viability selection on seasonally polyphenic traits: wing melanin pattern in western white butterflies. Evolution 49:932-941.
13. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
14. Li, C. C. 1975. Path analysis: a primer. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, CA.
15. Loehlin, J. C. 1987. Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path and structural analysis. Lawrence Earlbaum, London.
16. Mauricio, R., and L. E. Mojonnier. 1997. Reducing bias in the measurement of selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:433-436.
17. Mauricio, R., M. D. Rausher, and D. S. Burdick. 1997. Variation in the defense strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301-1311.
18. Pétavy, G., J. P. Morin, B. Moreteau, and J. R. David. 1997. Growth temperature and phenotypic plasticity in two Drosophila sibling species: probable adaptive changes in flight capacities. J. Evol. Biol. 10:875-888.
19. Pigliucci, M., K. Cammell, and J. Schmitt. 1999. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: a comparative approach in the neighborhood of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Evol. Biol. 12:779-791.
20. Price, G. R. 1970. Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520-521.
21. Rausher, M. D. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46:616-626.
22. Rausher, M. D., and E. L. Simms. 1989. The evolution of resistance to herbivory in Ipomoea purpurea. I. Attempts to detect selection. Evolution 43:563-572.
23. Redei, G. P., and C. Koncz. 1992. Classical mutagenesis. Pp. 16-82 in C. Koncz, N. H. Chua, and J. Schell, eds. Methods in Arabidopsis research. World Scientific, Singapore.
24. Roff, D. A. 1996. The evolution of genetic correlations: an analysis of patterns. Evolution 50:1392-1403.
25. Scheiner, S. M. 1989. Variable selection along a successional gradient. Evolution 43:548-562.
26. _. 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:35-68.
27. _. 1998. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. VII. Evolution in a spatially structured environment. J. Evol. Biol. 11:303-320.
28. Scheiner, S. M., and L. Y. Yampolsky. 1998. Evolution of Daphnia pulex in a temporally varying environment. Genet. Res. (Camb.) 72:25-37.
29. Schlichting, C. D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17:667-693.
30. _. 1989. Phenotypic integration and environmental change. BioScience 39:460-464.
31. Schmitt, J. 1997. Is photomorphogenic shade avoidance adaptive? Perspectives from population biology. Plant Cell Environ. 20: 826-830.
32. Smith, H. 1994. Sensing the light environment: the functions of the phytochrome family. Pp. 377-416. in R. E. Kendrick and G. H. M. Kronenberg, eds. Photomorphogenesis in plants. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht.
33. Spitze, K. 1992. Predator-mediated plasticity of prey life history and morphology: Chaoborus americanus predation on Daphnia pulex. Am. Nat. 139:229-247.
34. Thompson, L. 1994. The spatiotemporal effects of nitrogen and litter on dynamics of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Ecol. 82:63-68.
35. Via, S., R. Gomulkiewicz, G. de Jong, S. M. Scheiner, C. D. Schlichting, and P. H. van Tienderen. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:212-217.
36. Wade, M. J., and S. Kalisz. 1989. The additive partitioning of selection gradients. Evolution 43:1567-1569.
37. Weis, A. E., and W. L. German. 1990. Measuring selection in reaction norms: an exploration of the Eurosta-Solidago system. Evolution 44:820-831.
38. Westerman, J. M., and M. J. Lawrence. 1970. Genotype-environment interaction and developmental regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. I. Inbred lines; description. Heredity 25:609-627.
39. Winn, A. A. 1996. Adaptation to fine-grained environmental variation: an analysis of within-individual variation in an annual plant. Evolution 50:1111-1118.
40. Wright, S. 1920. The relative importance of heredity and environment in determining the piebald pattern of guinea pigs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 6:320-332.
41. Zhivotovsky, L. A., M. W. Feldman, and A. Bergman. 1996. On the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in a spatially heterogeneous environment. Evolution 50:547-558.