Fruit structure of Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae)

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 148, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 265-274

  Bobrov, Alexey V F Ch ^a   Endress, Peter K ^a   Melikian, Alexander P ^b   Romanov, Mikhail S ^c   Sorokin, Alexey N ^c   Bejerano, Alejandro Palmarola ^d  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Russian Federation)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAVANA   (Cuba)

Author keywords

ANITA grade; Austrobaileyales; Basal angiosperms; Chloranthaceae; Endocarp; Laurales; Nymphaeales; Pericarp anatomy; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

FRUIT;

AMBORELLA; AMBORELLA TRICHOPODA; AUSTROBAILEYALES; CHLORANTHACEAE; LAURALES; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; NYMPHAEALES;

EID: 22044448472     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2005.00422.x     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Bailey IW, Swamy BGL. 1948. Amborella trichopoda Baill., a new morphological type of vesselless dicotyledon. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 29: 245-254.
2. Baillon H. 1873. Sur deux genres de Monimiacées. Adansonia 10: 350-355.
3. Barkman TJ, Chenery G, McNeal JR, Lyons-Weiler J, Elisens WJ, Moore G, Wolfe AD, dePamphilis CW. 2000. Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 13166-13171.
4. von Beck GR. 1891. Versuch einer neuen Classification der Früchte. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 61: 307-312.
5. Bentham G, Hooker JD. 1862. Genera plantarum, Volume 1. London: L. Reeve.
6. nd International Conference on Plant Anatomy and Morphology. St. Petersburg: BIN RAS, 202.
7. Bobrov AVFCh, Melikian AP, Romanov MS, Sorokin AN. 2003. Fruit structure and phylogenetic relationships of Atherospermataceae. In: Afonina OM, Vinogradova KL, Golubkova NS, Kamelin RV, Kovalenko AE, Kotlov JV, Shmakov AI, eds. II (X) Congress of Russian Botanical Society, Novosibirsk, Vol. 1. Barnaul: Azbuka, 240-241.
8. Bondartzev AS. 1954. Schkala tzvetov dlya biologicheskih issledovany. [Scale of colours for biological investigations]. Moscow: Viysschaya Schkola. [In Russian].
9. Borsch T, Hilu KW, Quandt D, Wilde V, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. 2003. Noncoding plastid trnT-trnF sequences reveal a well resolved phylogeny of basal angiosperms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 558-576.
10. Buzgo M, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2004. Floral developmental morphology of Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 925-947.
11. Carlquist S, Schneider EL. 2001. Vegetative anatomy of the New Caledonia endemic Amborella trichopoda: relationships with the Illiciales and implications for vessel origin. Pacific Science 55: 305-312.
12. Cave C. 1869. Structure et développement du fruit. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Sér. 5, Botanique 10: 123-190.
13. Chase MW, Soltis DE, Olmstead RG, Morgan D, Les DH, Mishler BD, Duvall MR, Price RA et al. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcl. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
14. Corner EJH. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons. 2 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Couverchel P. 1839. Traité des fruits. Paris: Bouchard-Huzard.
16. Cronquist A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
17. Dahlgren R. 1977. A commentary on a diagrammatic presentation of the angiosperms in relation to the distribution of character states. Plant Systematics and Evolution Suppl. 1: 253-283.
18. Donoghue MJ, Doyle JA. 1989. Phylogenetic analysis of angiosperms and the relationships of Hamamelidae. In: Crane PR, Blackmore S, eds. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 17-45.
19. Doyle JA. 2000. Phylogeny of vascular plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 567-599.
20. Doyle JA, Endress PK. 2000. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: comparison and combination with molecular data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Suppl.): S121-S153.
21. Endress PK. 1972. Zur vergleichenden Entwicklungsmorphologie, Embryologie, und Systematik bei Laurales. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 92: 331-428.
22. Endress PK. 1980. The reproductive structures and systematic position of the Austrobaileyaceae. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 101: 393-403.
23. Endress PK. 1986. Reproductive structures and phylogenetic significance of extant primitive angiosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 152: 1-28.
24. Endress PK. 1987. The Chloranthaceae: reproductive structures and systematic position. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 109: 153-226.
25. Endress PK. 1994. Floral structure and evolution of primitive angiosperms: recent advances. Plant Systematics and Evolution 192: 79-97.
26. Endress PK. 2001. The flowers in extant basal angiosperms and inferences on ancestral flowers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 1111-1140.
27. Endress PK, Igersheim A. 1997. Gynoecium diversity and systematics of the Laurales. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 125: 93-168.
28. Endress PK, Igersheim A. 2000a. Gynoecium structure and evolution in basal angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Suppl.): S211-S223.
29. Endress PK, Igersheim A. 2000b. The reproductive structures of the basal angiosperm Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Suppl.): S237-S248.
30. Endress PK, Sampson FB. 1983. Floral structure and relationships of the Trimeniaceae (Laurales). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 64: 447-473.
31. Fedotova TA. 1988a. Gyrocarpaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa, Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, 84-86. [In Russian].
32. Fedotova TA. 1988b. Hernandiaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa, Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, 69-72. [In Russian].
33. Feild TS, Brodribb T, Jaffré T, Holbrook NM. 2001. Acclimation of leaf anatomy, photosynthetic light use, and xylem hydraulics to light in Amborella trichopoda. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 999-1008.
34. Feild TS, Zweiniecki MA, Brodribb T, Jaffré T, Donoghue MJ, Holbrook NM. 2000. Structure and function of tracheary elements in Amborella trichopoda. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 705-712.
35. Garcin AG. 1890. Recherches sur l'histogenèse des péricarpes charnus. Paris: G. Masson.
36. Garcin AG. 1891. Contribution à l'étude des péricarpes charnus. Du noyau des drupes. Histologie et histogenèse. Annales de la Société Botanique de Lyon 17: 27-39.
37. Goremykin W, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Wölfl S, Hellwig FH. 2003. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that Amborella is not a basal angiosperm. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 1499-1505.
38. Goremykin W, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Wölfl S, Hellwig FH. 2004. Darwin's abominable mystery solved? Not so fast. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2004 (4): 35 (on-line).
39. Graham SW, Olmstead RG. 2000. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 87: 1712-1730.
40. Graham SW, Reeves PA, Burns ACE, Olmstead RG. 2000. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: interpretation, evolution, and utility of INDELS and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Suppl.): S83-S96.
41. Hegedüs A. 1948. A termések osztályozása. Borbásia 8: 62-75.
42. Heo K, Kimoto Y, Riveros M, Tobe H. 2004. Embryology of Gomortegaceae (Laurales): characteristics and character evolution. Journal of Plant Research 117: 221-228.
43. Heo K, Tobe H. 1995. Embryology and relationships of Gyrocarpus and Hernandia (Hernandiaceae). Journal of Plant Research 108: 327-341.
44. Heo K, van der Werff H, Tobe H. 1998. Embryology and relationships of Lauraceae (Laurales). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 126: 295-322.
45. Hesse M. 2001. Pollen characters of Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae): a reinvestigation. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 201-208.
46. Hilu KW, Borsch T, Müller K, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Savolainen V, Chase MW, Powell MP, Alice LA, Evans R, Sauquet H, Neinhuis C, Slotta TAB, Rohwer JG, Campbell CS, Chatrou LW. 2003. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. American Journal of Botany 90: 1758-1776.
47. Hutchinson J. 1969. Evolution and phylogeny of flowering plants. London: Academic Press.
48. Jérémie J. 1982. Amborellaceae. In: Aubréville A, Leroy J-F, eds. Flore de la Nouvelle-Calédonie et dépendances, Vol. 10. Paris: Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 157-160.
49. Kaden NN. 1961. O nekotoryh fundamental'nyh problemah klassifikatzii, tipologii i nomenklatury plodov. [On some fundamental problems of classification, typology and nomenclature of fruits]. Botanicheskij Zhurnal 46: 496-504. [In Russian].
50. Kubitzki K. 1969. Monographie der Hernandiaceen. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 89: 78-209.
51. Levina RE. 1961. O klassifikatzii i nomenclature plodov. [On the classification and nomenclature of fruits]. Botanicheskij Zhurnal 46: 488-495. [In Russian].
52. Levina RE. 1987. Morfologija i ekologija plodov. [Morphology and ecology of fruits]. Leningrad: Nauka. [In Russian].
53. Loconte H, Stevenson DW. 1991. Cladistics of the Magnoliidae. Cladistics 7: 267-296.
54. Mathews S, Donoghue MJ. 1999. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286: 947-950.
55. Melikian AP. 1981. O nekotoryikh obshchikh tendentzijakh v evolyutzyii i specializatzyii plodov. [On some general tendencies and specialization of fruits]. In: Sytnik CM, ed. Problems of evolutionary morphology and biochemistry in systematics and phylogeny of plants. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 117-125. [In Russian].
56. Melikian AP. 1988a. Illiciaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa, Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, 48-49. [In Russian].
57. Melikian AP. 1988b. Schisandraceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa, Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, 49-50. [In Russian].
58. Melikian AP. 1996. Sravnitelnaja karpologija i sistematika pokryitosemennyikh rastenij. [Comparative carpology and systematic of angiosperms]. In: Tikhomirov VN, ed. IX Moscow Meeting on Plant Phylogeny, Moscow, 86-88. [In Russian].
59. st conference of plant anatomy and morphology, St.-Petersburg, 91-92. [In Russian].
60. Melikian AP, Bobrov AVFCh, Zaitzeva ES. 1999. A new fruit type in Amborella trichopoda Baill. (Amborellaceae Pichon). In: Manitz H, Hellwig FH, eds. 14. Symposium 'Biodiversität & Evolutionsbiologie', Jena, 122.
61. Melikian AP, Deviatov AG. 2001. Osnovnyie karpologicheskie terminyi. [Main carpological terms]. Moscow: KMK-Moscow University. [In Russian].
62. Melikian AP, Dzhalilova KhKh. 2002. Sravnitel'naya karpologiya semeystva lavrovyh (Lauraceae). [Comparative carpology of Lauraceae family]. In: Novikov VS, Timonin AK, Yurceva OV, eds. International scientific conference on systematics of higher plants. Moscow: BCC-Press, 72-73. [In Russian].
63. Melikian AP, Dzhalilova KhKh. 2003a. Taksonomicheskie i filogeneticheskie svyazi predstaviteley semeystva lavrovih (Lauraceae). [Taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships of the members of the family Lauraceae]. In: Novikov VS, Timonin AK, Sherbakov AV, eds. XI International plant phylogeny symposium. Moscow: BCC-Press, 67-68. [In Russian].
64. Melikian AP, Dzhalilova KhKh. 2003b. Morfologia, anatomija i ultrastruktura plodov rjada predstavitelej semejstva Lauraceae [Morphology, anatomy, and ultrastructure of fruits in some representatives of Lauraceae family]. Bulluten' Moskovskogo Obshestva Ispítateley Prirodí, Otdelenie Biologicheskoe 108: 63-69. [In Russian].
65. Melikian AP, Nemirovich-Danchenko EN. 1988. Nymphaeaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa, Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, 140-147. [In Russian].
66. Metcalfe CR. 1987. Anatomy of the dicotyledons, 2nd edn, Vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
67. Mohana Rao PR. 1986. Seed and fruit anatomy in Gyrocarpus americanus with a discussion on the affinities of Hernandiaceae. Israel Journal of Botany 35: 133-152.
68. Money LL, Bailey IW, Swamy BGL. 1950. The morphology and relationships of the Monimiaceae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 31: 37-404.
69. Nandi OI, Chase MW, Endress PK. 1998. A combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms using rbcL and non-molecular data sets. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 137-212.
70. Nemirovich-Danchenko EN. 1988. Lauraceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa, Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, 77-84. [In Russian].
71. Novák FA. 1954. Systém angiosperm. Preslia 26: 337-364.
72. O'Brien TP, McCully ME. 1981. The study of plant structure: principles and selected methods. Melbourne: Termarcarphi & Pty. Ltd.
73. Parkinson CL, Adams KL, Palmer JD. 1999. Multigene analyses identify the three earliest lineages of extant flowering plants. Current Biology 9: 1485-1488.
74. Perkins J. 1911. Monimiaceae (Nachträge). In: Engler A, ed. Das Pflanzenreich. IV. Leipzig: Engelmann, 1-67.
75. Perkins J. 1925. Übersicht uber die Gattungen der Monimiaceae. Leipzig: Engelmann.
76. Perkins J, Gilg E. 1901. Monimiaceae. In: Engler A, ed. Das Pflanzenreich. IV. Leipzig: Engelmann, 1-122.
77. Petrova LR. 1988. Trimeniaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa, Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, 56. [In Russian].
78. Philipson WR. 1986. Monimiaceae. Flora Malesiana, Series I, Vol. 10. Den Haag, Leiden: Nijhoff, 255-326.
79. Philipson WR. 1993. Amborellaceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer JG, Bittrich V, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 2. Berlin: Springer, 92-93.
80. Pichon P. 1948. Les Monimiacées, famille hété rogène. Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, ser. II 20: 383-384.
81. Plisko MA. 1988a. Amborellaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa, Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, 54-55. [In Russian].
82. Plisko MA. 1988b. Austrobaileyaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa, Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, 51-52. [In Russian].
83. Posluszny U, Tomlinson PB. 2003. Aspects of inflorescence and floral development in the putative basal angiosperm Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 81: 28-39.
84. Prozina MN. 1960. Botanicheskaja mikrotekhnika. [Botanical Microtechniques]. Moscow: Vysschaya Schkola. [In Russian].
85. Qiu YL, Chase MW, Les DH, Parks CR. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of the Magnoliidae: cladistic analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 587-606.
86. Qiu YL, Lee J, Bernasconi-Quadroni F, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Zanis M, Zimmer EA, Chen Z, Savolainen V, Chase MW. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402: 404-407.
87. Qiu YL, Lee J, Bernasconi-Quadroni F, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Zanis M, Zimmer EA, Chen Z, Savolainen V, Chase MW. 2000. Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: analyses of five genes from three genomes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Suppl.): S3-S27.
88. Qiu YL, Lee J, Whitlock BA, Bernasconi-Quadroni F, Dombrovska O. 2001. Was the ANITA rooting of the angiosperm phylogeny affected by long-branch attraction? Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 1745-1753.
89. Renner SS. 1999. Circumscription and phylogeny of the Laurales: evidence from molecular and morphological data. American Journal of Botany 86: 1301-1315.
90. Rohwer JG. 1993. Lauraceae. In: Kubitzki K, Rohwer JG, Bittrich V, eds. The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 2. Berlin: Springer, 366-391.
91. Roth I. 1977. Fruits of angiosperms. Berlin: Borntraeger.
92. Sampson FB. 1993. Pollen morphology of the Amborellaceae and Hortoniaceae (Hortonioideae: Monimiaceae). Grana 32: 154-162.
93. Sampson FB. 2000. Pollen diversity of some modern magnoliids. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Suppl.): S193-S210.
94. Saunders RMK. 1998. Monograph of Kadsura (Schisandraceae). Systematic Botany Monographs 54: 1-106.
95. Saunders RMK. 2000. Monograph of Schisandra (Schisandraceae). Systematic Botany Monographs 58: 1-146.
96. Semikhov VF. 1999. O neobkhodimosti perekhoda k integrativnoy sistematike rastenij. [On the necessity of transition to the integrative systematic of plants]. Lotova LI, Melikian AP, eds. X Moscow Meeting on Plant Phylogeny, Moscow, 151-154. [In Russian].
97. Soltis DE, Soltis PS. 2004. Amborella not a 'basal angiosperm? Not so fast. American Journal of Botany 91: 997-1001.
98. Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Chase MW. 1999. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402: 402-404.
99. Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Zanis MJ, Kim S. 2000. Basal lineages of angiosperms: relationships and implications for floral evolution. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Suppl.): S97-S107.
100. Spjut RWA. 1994. Systematic treatment of fruit types. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 70: 1-181.
101. Stefanovic S, Rice DW, Palmer JD. 2004. Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots? BMC Evolutionary Biology 2004 (4): 35 (on-line).
102. Sytsma KJ, Pires JC. 2001. Plant systematics in the next 50 years - re-mapping the new frontier. Taxon 50: 713-732.
103. Takhtajan AL. 1966. Systema et phylogenia Magnoliophytorum. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian].
104. Takhtajan AL. 1987. Systema Magnoliophytorum. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian].
105. Takhtajan AL. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
106. Thien LB, Sage TL, Jaffré T, Bernhardt P, Pontieri V, Weston PH, Malloch D, Azuma H, Graham SW, McPherson MA, Rai HS, Sage RF, Dupre J-L. 2003. The population structure and floral biology of Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 90: 466-490.
107. Thorne RF. 1992. An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. El Aliso 13: 365-389.
108. Thorne RF. 1999. An updated classification of the class Angiospermae. http://www.inform.umd.edu/PBIO/fam/thorneangiosp99.html
109. Tobe H, Jaffré T, Raven PH. 2000. Embryology of Amborella (Amborellaceae): descriptions and polarity of character states. Journal of Plant Research 113: 271-280.
110. Tournefort JP. 1719. Institutiones rei herbariae, Vol. I (ed. 3). Paris: Typographia regia.
111. Visjenskaya TD. 1988a. Monimiaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa, Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, 56-64. [In Russian].
112. Visjenskaya TD. 1988b. Siparunaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa, Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, 66-68. [In Russian].
113. Winkler H. 1940. Zur Einigung und Weiterführung in der Frage des Fruchtsystems. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 27: 92-130.
114. Yamada T, Tobe H, Imaichi R, Kato M. 2001. Developmental morphology of the ovules of Amborella trichopoda (Amborellaceae) and Chloranthus serratus (Chloranthaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 137: 277-290.
115. Zanis MJ, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Mathews S, Donoghue MJ. 2002. The root of the angiosperms revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 6848-6853.