Provision of anatomical teaching in a new British Medical School: Getting the right mix

Anatomical Record - Part B New Anatomist

Volumn 284, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 22-27

  Evans, Darrell J R ^a,c   Watt, Diana J ^b  

^a BRIGHTON AND SUSSEX MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b HIGHER EDUCATION ACADEMY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Cadaveric dissection; Education; Imaging; Living anatomy; Medical school

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; CADAVER; CURRICULUM; DISSECTION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TEACHING; TECHNOLOGY; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANATOMY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EVALUATION STUDIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL;

EID: 21244460784     PISSN: 0003276X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Aziz MA, McKenzie JC, Wilson JS, Cowie RJ, Ayeni SA, Dunn BK. 2002. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anat Rec 269:20-32.
2. Bastos LA, Proenca MA. 2000. Anatomy practice and medical education. Rev Panam Salud Publica 7:395-402.
3. Bourguet CC, Whittier WL, Taslitz N. 1997. Survey of educational roles of the faculty of anatomy departments. Clin Anat 10:264-271.
4. Dahle LO, Brynhildsen J, Behrbohm Fallsberg M, Rundquist I, Hammar M. 2002. Pros and cons of vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum: examples and experiences from Linkoping, Sweden. Med Teach 24:280-285.
5. General Medical Council. 1993. Tomorrow's doctors: recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council.
6. General Medical Council. 2003. Tomorrow's doctors: recommendations on undergraduate medical education, 2nd ed. London: General Medical Council.
7. Houwink AP, Kurup AN, Kollars JP, Kral Kollars CA, Carmichael S, Pawlina W. 2004. Help of third-year medical students decreases first-year medical student's negative psychological reactions on the first day of gross anatomy dissection. Clin Anat 17:328-333.
8. McGarvey MA, Farrell T, Conroy RM, Kandiah S, Monkhouse WS. 2001. Dissection: a positive experience. Clin Anat 14: 227-230.
9. McLachlan JC. 2004. New path for teaching anatomy: living anatomy and medical imaging vs dissection. Anat Rec (New Anat) 281B:4-5.
10. McLachlan JC, Bligh J, Bradley P, Searle J. 2004a. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med Educ 38:418-424.
11. McLachlan JC, Regan De Bere S, Bligh J, Britten N, Petersen A. 2004b. Anatomy is life: anatomy is not death. Proc AMEE 8E1:4.105.
12. Medical Workforce Standing Advisory Committee. 1997. Planning the medical workforce, 3rd report. Washington, DC: Department of Health.
13. Mitchell BS, Stephens CR. 2004. Teaching anatomy as a multimedia experience. Med Educ 38:911-912.
14. Mitchell BS, McCrorie P, Sedgwick P. 2004. Student attitude towards anatomy teaching and learning in a multiprofessional context. Med Educ 38:737-748.
15. Newell RLM. 1995. Follow the royal road: the case for dissection. Clin Anat 8:124-127.
16. Older J. 2004. Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon 2:79-90.
17. Parker LM. 2002. What's wrong with the dead body? use of the human cadaver in medical education. Med J Aust 176:74-76.
18. Reidenberg JS, Laitman JT. 2002. The new face of gross anatomy. Anat Rec 269:81-88.
19. Teichgraber UK, Meyer JM, Poulsen Nautrup C, von Rautenfeld DB. 1996. Ultrasound anatomy: a practical teaching system in human gross anatomy. Med Educ 30:296-298.
20. Weeks SE, Harris EE, Kinzey KG. 1995. Human gross anatomy: a crucial time to encourage respect and compassion in students. Clin Anat 8:69-79.
21. Willan PL, Humpherson JR. 1999. Concepts of variation and normality in morphology: important issues at risk of neglect in modern undergraduate medical courses. Clin Anat 12:186-190.