The transcriptome of Populus in elevated CO2

New Phytologist

Volumn 167, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 143-154

  Taylor, Gail ^a   Street, Nathaniel R ^a   Tricker, Penny J ^a   Sjödin, Andreas ^b   Graham, Laura ^a   Skogström, Oskar ^b   Calfapietra, Carlo ^c   Scarascia Mugnozza, Giuseppe ^c   Jansson, Stefan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Elevated CO2 ; FACE (free air CO2 enrichment); Gene expression; Leaf development; Microarray; Populus

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; LEAF;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; ASPEN; ATMOSPHERE; DNA MICROARRAY; DRUG EFFECT; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; TIME;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ATMOSPHERE; CARBON DIOXIDE; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; POPULUS; TIME FACTORS;

POPULUS; POPULUS EURAMERICANA;

EID: 21244452826     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01450.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Andersson A, Kesikitalo J, Sjödin A, Bhalerao R, Sterky F, Wissel K, Tandre K, Aspeborg H, Moyle R, Ohmiya Y, Bhalerao R, Brunner A, Gustafsson P, Karlsson J, Lundeberg J, Nilsson O, Sandberg G, Strauss S, Sundberg B, Uhlen M, Jansson S, Nilsson P. 2004. A transcriptional timetable of autumn senescence. Genome Biology 5: R24.
2. 2 enrichment (PopFACE) during the first growth cycle and immediately following coppice. New Phytologist 159: 609-621.
3. Bhalerao R, Keskitalo J, Sterky F, Erlandsson R, Björkbacka H, Jonsson Birve S, Karlsson J, Gardeström P, Gustafsson P, Lundeberg J, Jansson S. 2003. Gene expression in autumn leaves. Plant Physiology 131: 430-442.
4. 2 enrichment (FACE) enhances biomass production in a short-rotation poplar plantation (POPFACE). Tree Physiology 23: 805-814.
5. Chang S, Puryear J, Cairney J. 1993. A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 11: 114-117.
6. Che P, Gingerich DJ, Lall S, Howell SH. 2002. Global and hormone-induced gene expression changes during shoot development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14: 2771-2785.
7. Chen W, Provart NJ, Glazevrook J, Katagiri F, Chang H-S, Eulgem T, Mauch F, Luan S, Zou G, Whitham SA, Budworth PR, Tao Y, Xie Z, Chen X, Lam S, Kreps JA, Harper JF, Si-Ammour A, Muach-Mani B, Heinlein M, Kobayashi K, Hohn T, Dangl JL, Wang X, Zhu T. 2002. Expression profile matrix of Arabidopsis transcription factor genes suggests their putative functions in response to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 14: 559-574.
8. Cheng SH, Willmann MR, Chen HC, Sheen J. 2002. Calcium signaling through protein kinases. The Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinase gene family. Plant Physiology 129: 469-485.
9. Diaz E, Yang YH, Ferreira T, Loh KC, Okazaki Y, Hayashizaki Y, Tessier-Lavingne M, Speed TP, Ngai J. 2003. Analysis of gene expression in the developing mouse retina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100: 5491-5496.
10. 2? Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48: 609-639.
11. Dudley AM, Aach J, Steffen MA, Church GM. 2002. Measuring absolute expression with microarrays with a calibrated reference sample and an extended signal intensity range. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 7554-7559.
12. 2 enrichment. Oecologia 104: 139-146.
13. Falge E, Tenhunen J, Baldocchi D, Aubinet M, Bakwin P, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Bonnefond JM, Burba G, Clement R, Davis KJ, Falk M, Goldstein AH, Grelle A, Granier A, Grunwald T, Gudmundsson J, Hollinger D, Janssens IA, Keronen P, Kowalski AS, Katul G, Law BE, Malhi Y, Meyers T, Monson RK, Moors E, Munger JW, Oechel WUKTP, Pilegaard K, Rannik U, Rebmann C, Suyker A, Thorgeirsson H, Tirone G, Turnipseed A, Wilson K, Wofsy S. 2002. Phase and amplitude of ecosystem carbon release and uptake potentials as derived from FLUXNET measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 113: 75-95.
14. Feder ME, Mitchell-Olds T. 2004. Evolutionary and ecological functional genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 649-655.
15. 2 enrichment (POPFACE) through increased cell expansion and production. Plant, Cell & Environment 24: 305-315.
16. Fleming AJ. 2003. The molecular regulation of leaf form. Plant Biology 5: 341-349.
17. Gibson G. 2002. Microarrays in ecology and evolution: a preview. Molecular Ecology 11: 17-24.
18. Gielen B, Calfapietra C, Sabatti M, Ceulemans R. 2001. Leaf area dynamics in a closed poplar plantation under free-air carbon dioxide enrichment. Tree Physiology 21: 1245-1255.
19. 2 enrichment (POPFACE) only slightly affect profiles of light and leaf characteristics in closed canopies of Populus. Global Change Biology 9: 1022-1037.
20. Grace J. 2004. Understanding and managing the global carbon cycle. Journal of Ecology 92: 189-202.
21. 2: a broader perspective. Photosynthesis Research 39: 369-388.
22. 2. Global Change Biology 5: 293-309.
23. 2: a synthesis of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project. Functional Ecology 17: 289-304.
24. Koch KE. 1996. Carbohydrate modulated gene expression in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47: 509-540.
25. Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Ort DR. 2004. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55: 591-628.
26. 2 (POPFACE). Global Change Biology 9: 838-848.
27. 2 enrichment. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 383-389.
28. 2 enrichment (FACE) of a poplar plantation: The POPFACE fumigation system. New Phytologist 150: 465-476.
29. 2. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 567-582.
30. Moseyko N, Zhu T, Chang H-S, Wang X, Feldman LJ. 2002. Transcription profiling of early gravitropic response in Arabidopsis using high-density oligonucleotide probe microarrays. Plant Physiology 130: 720-728.
31. 2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant, Cell & Environment 22: 683-714.
32. Pien S, Wyrzykowska J, Fleming AJ. 2001. Novel marker genes for early leaf development indicate spatial regulation of carbohydrate metabolism within the apical meristem. Plant Journal 25: 663-674.
33. Read P. 2002. Precautionary climate policy and the somewhat flawed protocol: linking sinks to biofuel and the CDM to the convention. Climate Policy 2: 89-95.
34. Ririe K. 2002. Product differentiation by analysis of DNA melting curves during the polymerase chain reaction. Analytical Biochemistry 245: 154-160.
35. 2. Global Change Biology 6: 1005-1011.
36. Roitsch T. 1999. Souce-sink regulation by sugar and stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2: 198-206.
37. 2: is it related to sucrose-phosphate synthase activity? Plant Physiology 108: 1471-1477.
38. Sheen J, Zhou L, Jang JC. 1999. Sugars as signaling molecules. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2: 410-418.
39. Shih JH, Michalowska AM, Dobin K, Yumei Y, Ting Hu Q, Green JE. 2004. Effects of pooling mRNA in microarray class comparisons. Bioinformatics 20: 3318-3325.
40. Smeekens S. 2000. Sugar-induced signal transduction in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 51: 49-81.
41. Smyth GK. 2004. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 3(1): article 3.
42. Sterky F, Regan S, Karlsson J, Hertzberg M, Rohde A, Holmberg A, Amini B, Bhalerao R, Larsson M, Villarroel R, Van Montagu M, Sandberg G, Olsson O, Boerjan W, Gustafsson P, Uhlen M, Sundberg B, Lundeberg J. 1998. Gene discovery in the wood-forming tissues of poplar: Analysis of 5692 expressed sequence tags. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 95: 13330-13335.
43. Sterky F, Bhalerao RP, Unneberg P, Segerman B, Nilsson P, Brunner AM, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Jonsson Lindvall J, Tandre K, Strauss SH, Sundberg B, Gustafsson P, Uhlén M, Bhalerao RP, Nilsson O, Sandberg G, Karlsson J, Lundeberg J, Jansson S. 2004. A Populus EST resource for plant functional genomics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 13591-13596.
44. Taylor G. 2002. Populus: Arabidopsis for forestry. Do we need a model tree? Annals of Botany 90: 681-689.
45. 2 and plant growth - cellular mechanisms and responses of whole plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 45: 1761-1774.
46. 2 enrichment (POP-FACE) on leaf growth, cell expansion and production in a closed canopy of Populus. Plant Physiology 131: 177-185.
47. 2 enrichment during canopy closure in Populus. New Phytologist 162: 413-426.
48. Vinciotti V, Khanin R et al. 2005. An experimental evaluation of a loop versus a reference design for two-channel microarrays. Bioinformatics 21: 492-501.
49. 2: lessons from Arabidopsis. Ecology Letters 7: 427-440.
50. Wissel K, Pettersson F, Berglund A, Jansson S. 2003. What affects mRNA levels in leaves of field-grown Aspen? A study of developmental and environmental influences. Plant Physiology 133: 1190-1197.
51. 2 enrichment (FACE). New Phytologist 150: 489-498.
52. Wullschleger SD, Jansson S, Taylor G. 2002. Genomics and forest biology: Populus emerges as the perennial favourite. Plant Cell 14: 2651-2655.
53. Yu S-M. 1999. Cellular and genetic responses of plants to sugar starvation. Plant Physiology 121: 687-693.
54. Zhu T, Budworth P, Han B, Brown D, Chang H-S, Wang X. 2001. Toward elucidating the global gene expression patterns of developing Arabidopsis: parallel analysis of 8300 genes by high-density oligonucleotide probe array. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 39: 221-242.