Two cognitive systems simultaneously prepared for opposite events

Psychophysiology

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 835-838

  Ritter, Walter ^a   Sussman, Elyse ^a   Deacon, Diana ^b   Cowan, Nelson ^c   Vaughan Jr , Herbert G ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

ERPs; Mismatch negativity; Modularity; P3; Preparation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0032753755     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0048577299990248     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Alain, C., & Woods, D. L. (1997). Attention modulates auditory pattern memory as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 34, 534-546.
2. Alho, K. (1995). Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear and Hearing, 16, 38-60.
3. Alho, K., Escera, C., Diaz, R., Yago, E., & Serra, J. M. (1997). Effects of involuntary auditory attention on visual task performance and brain activity. NeuroReport, 8, 3233-3237.
4. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357-374.
5. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590-604.
6. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
8. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Novak, G., Ritter, W., Vaughan, H. G., Jr., & Wiznitzer, M. L. (1990). Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 75, 255-275.
10. Pritchard, W. (1981). Psychophysiology of P300. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 506-540.
11. Ritter, W., Gomes, H., Cowan, N., Sussman, E., & Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1998). Reactivation of a dormant representation of an auditory stimulus feature. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 605-614.
12. Schröger, E. (1996). A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 527-539.
13. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71-87.
14. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1965). Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainly. Science, 150, 1187-1188.
15. Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1994). Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by preattentive sensory memory. Nature, 372, 90-92.
16. Woldorff, M. G., Hackley, S. A., & Hillyard, S. A. (1991). The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones. Psychophysiology, 28, 30-42.
17. Woldorff, M., Hansen, J. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1987). Evidence for effects of selective attention in the mid-latency range of the human auditory event-related brain potential. In R. Johnson, J. W. Rohrbaugh, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Current trends in event-related potential research (pp. 146-154). Amsterdam: Elsevier.