Illusory sound shifts induced by the ventriloquist illusion evoke the mismatch negativity

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 357, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 163-166

  Stekelenburg, Jeroen J ^a   Vroomen, Jean ^a   De Gelder, Beatrice ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Crossmodal interaction; Mismatch negativity; Ventriloquist illusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; SOUND DETECTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SOUND; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 1542315527     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.12.085     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bertelson P., de Gelder B. The psychology of multimodal perception. Spence C., Driver J. Crossmodal Space and Crossmodal Attention. 2003;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Bertelson P., Vroomen J., de Gelder B., Driver J. The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention. Percept. Psychophys. 62:2000;321-332.
3. Berti S., Schröger E. A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioural and event-related indices. Cogn. Brain Res. 10:2001;265-273.
4. Calvert G.A., Campbell R., Brammer M.J. Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the heteromodal cortex. Curr. Biol. 10:2000;649-657.
5. Colin C., Radeau M., Soquet A., Dachy B., Deltenre P. Electrophysiology of spatial scene analysis: the mismatch negativity (MMN) is sensitive to the ventriloquism illusion. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113:2002;507-518.
6. de Gelder B., Böcker K.B.E., Tuomainen J., Hensen M., Vroomen J. The combined perception of emotion from voice and face: early interaction revealed by human electric brain responses. Neurosci. Lett. 260:1999;133-136.
7. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophys. 55:1983;468-484.
8. McGurk H., MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature. 383:1976;746-748.
9. Möttönen R., Krause C.M., Tiippana K., Sams M. Processing of changes in visual speech in the human auditory cortex. Cogn. Brain Res. 13:2002;417-425.
10. Näätänen R. Attention and Brain Function. 1992;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Paavilainen P., Karlsson M.L., Reinikainen K., Näätänen R. Mismatch negativity to change in spatial location of an auditory stimulus. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophys. 73:1989;129-141.
12. Ruusuvirta T. From spatial acoustic changes to attentive behavioral responses within 200 ms in humans. Neursci. Lett. 275:1999;49-52.
13. Sams M., Aulanko R., Hämäläinen M., Hari R., Lounasmaa O.V., Lu S.-T., Simola J. Seeing speech: visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 127:1991;141-145.
14. Schröger E. On the detection of auditory deviants: a pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology. 34:1997;245-257.
15. Vroomen J., Bertelson P., de Gelder B. The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of automatic visual attention. Percept. Psychophys. 63:2001;651-659.