Nucleotide excision repair activity varies among murine spermatogenic cell types

Biology of Reproduction

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 123-130

  Xu, Guogang ^a   Spivak, Graciela ^d   Mitchell, David L ^e   Mori, Toshi ^f   McCarrey, John R ^g   McMahan, C Alex ^a   Walter, Ronald B ^h   Hanawalt, Philip C ^d   Walter, Christi A ^a,b,c,i  

^a Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^c University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^f NARA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^h Texas State University   (United States)

ⁱ SOUTH TEXAS VETERANS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Gamete biology; Gametogenesis; Spermatogenesis

Indexed keywords

CYCLOBUTANE DERIVATIVE; CYCLOBUTANE PYRIMIDINE DIMER; PYRIMIDINONE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL SPECIFICITY; CELL TYPE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; EXCISION REPAIR; GENOME ANALYSIS; KERATINOCYTE; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PACHYTENE; PHOTODEGRADATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPERMATID; SPERMATOCYTE; SPERMATOGONIUM;

AGE FACTORS; ANIMALS; DNA; DNA REPAIR; MALE; MICE; PYRIMIDINE DIMERS; SPERMATOGENESIS; SPERMATOZOA; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

MURINAE;

EID: 20844435984     PISSN: 00063363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.039123     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Dycaico MJ, Provost GS, Kretz PL, Ransom SL, Moores JC, Short JM. The use of shuttle vectors for mutation analysis in transgenic mice and rats. Mutat Res 1994; 307:461-478.
2. Walter CA, Intano GW, McCarrey JR, McMahan CA, Walter RB. Mutation frequency declines during spermatogenesis in young mice but increases in old mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:10015-10019.
3. Winn RN, Norris MB, Brayer KJ, Torres C, Muller SL. Detection of mutations in transgenic fish carrying a bacteriophage lambda ell transgene target. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:12655-12660.
4. Rubio C, Gil-Salom M, Simon C, Vidal F, Rodrigo L, Minguez Y, Rernohi J, Pellicer A. Incidence of sperm chromosomal abnormalities in a risk population: relationship with sperm quality and ICSI outcome. Hum Reprod 2001; 16:2084-2092.
5. Saleh RA, Agarwal A, Nelson DR, Nada EA, El-Tonsy MH, Alvarez JG, Thomas AJ Jr, Sharma RK. Increased sperm nuclear DNA damage in normozoospermic infertile men: a prospective study. Fertil Steril 2002; 78:313-318.
6. Sorahan T, Lancashire RJ, Hulten MA, Peck I, Stewart AM. Childhood cancer and parental use of tobacco: deaths from 1953 to 1955. Br J Cancer 1997; 75:134-138.
7. Grufferman S, Wang HH, DeLong ER, Kimm SY, Delzell ES, Falletta JM. Environmental factors in the etiology of rhabdomyosarcoma in childhood. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982; 68:107-113.
8. Ji BT, Shu XO, Linet MS, Zheng W, Wacholder S, Gao YT, Ying DM, Jin F. Paternal cigarette smoking and the risk of childhood cancer among offspring of nonsmoking mothers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 89:238-244.
9. Petit C, Sancar A. Nucleotide excision repair: from E. coli to man. Biochimie 1999; 81:15-25.
10. Batty DP, Wood RD. Damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair of DNA. Gene 2000; 241:193-204.
11. Hanawalt PC. Controlling the efficiency of excision repair. Mutat Res 2001; 485:3-13.
12. de Laat WL, Jaspers NG, Hoeijmakers JH. Molecular mechanism of nucleotide excision repair. Genes Dev 1999; 13:768-785.
13. Hanawalt PC. Subpathways of nucleotide excision repair and their regulation. Oncogene 2002; 21:8949-8956.
14. Tornaletti S, Maeda LS, Lloyd DR, Reines D, Hanawalt PC. Effect of thymine glycol on transcription elongation by T7 RNA polymerase and mammalian RNA polymerase II. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:45367-45371.
15. Balajee AS, Bohr VA. Genomic heterogeneity of nucleotide excision repair. Gene 2000; 250:15-30.
16. Vreeswijk MP, van Hoffen A, Westland BE, Vrieling H, van Zeeland AA, Mullenders LH. Analysis of repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and pyrimidine 6-4 pyrimidone photoproducts in transcriptionally active and inactive genes in Chinese hamster cells. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:31858-31863.
17. Mellon I, Hanawalt PC. Induction of the Escherichia coli lactose operon selectively increases repair of its transcribed DNA strand. Nature 1989; 342:95-98.
18. Guo Z, Heydari A, Richardson A. Nucleotide excision repair of actively transcribed versus nontranscribed DNA in rat hepatocytes: effect of age and dietary restriction. Exp Cell Res 1998; 245:228-238.
19. Bentley KS, Working PK. Activity of germ-cell mutagens and non-mutagens in the rat spermatocyte UDS assay. Mutat Res 1988; 203: 135-142.
20. Sotomayor RE, Sega GA. Unscheduled DNA synthesis assay in mammalian spermatogenic cells: an update. Environ Mol Mutagen 2000; 36:255-265.
21. Sega GA. Unscheduled DNA synthesis in the germ cells of male mice exposed in vivo to the chemical mutagen ethyl methanesulfonate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1974; 71:4955-4959.
22. Jansen J, Olsen AK, Wiger R, Naegeli H, de Boer P, van Der Hoeven F, Holme JA, Brunborg G, Mullenders L. Nucleotide excision repair in rat male germ cells: low level of repair in intact cells contrasts with high dual incision activity in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:1791-1800.
23. Bellve A. Purification, culture, and fractionation of spermatogenic cells. Methods Enzymol 1993; 225:85-113.
24. Spector AL, Goldman RD, Leinwand LA. Cells: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1998:5.3-5.4.
25. Mitchell DL, Volkmer B, Breitbart EW, Byrom M, Lowery MG, Greinert R. Identification of a non-dividing subpopulation of mouse and human epidermal cells exhibiting high levels of persistent ultraviolet photodamage. J Invest Dermatol 2001; 117:590-595.
26. Nouspikel T, Hanawalt PC. Terminally differentiated human neurons repair transcribed genes but display attenuated global DNA repair and modulation of repair gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:1562-1570.
27. Kobayashi N, Katsumi S, Imoto K, Nakagawa A, Miyagawa S, Furumura M, Mori T. Quantitation and visualization of ultraviolet-induced DNA damage using specific antibodies: application to pigment cell biology. Pigment Cell Res 2001; 14:94-102.
28. Mori T, Nakane M, Hattori T, Matsunaga T, Ihara M, Nikaido O. Simultaneous establishment of monoclonal antibodies specific for either cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer or (6-4)photoproduct from the same mouse immunized with ultraviolet-irradiated DNA. Photochem Photobiol 1991; 54:225-232.
29. Spivak G, Hanawalt PC. Determination of damage and repair in specific DNA sequences. Methods: A Companion to Methods in Enzymology 1995; 7:147-161.
30. Cooke HJ, Lee M, Kerr S, Ruggiu M. A murine homologue of the human DAZ gene is autosomal and expressed only in male and female gonads. Hum Mol Genet 1996; 5:513-516.
31. Eddy EM. Male germ cell gene expression. Recent Prog Horm Res 2002; 57:103-128.
32. Kleene KC. A possible meiotic function of the peculiar patterns of gene expression in mammalian spermatogenic cells. Mech Dev 2001; 106:3-23.
33. Bohr VA, Smith CA, Okumoto DS, Hanawalt PC. DNA repair in an active gene: removal of pyrimidine dimers from the DHFR gene of CHO cells is much more efficient than in the genome overall. Cell 1985; 40:359-369.
34. Fitch ME, Nakajima S, Yasui A, Ford JM. In vivo recruitment of XPC to UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers by the DDB2 gene product. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:46906-46910.
35. Hwang BJ, Toering S, Francke U, Chu G. p48 Activates a UV-damaged-DNA binding factor and is defective in xeroderma pigmentosum group E cells that lack binding activity. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18:4391-4399.
36. Tang JY, Hwang BJ, Ford JM, Hanawalt PC, Chu G. Xeroderma pigmentosum p48 gene enhances global genomic repair and suppresses UV-induced mutagenesis. Mol Cell 2000; 5:737-744.
37. Print CG, Loveland KL. Germ cell suicide: new insights into apoptosis during spermatogenesis. Bioessays 2000; 22:423-430.
38. Crow JF. The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation. Nat Rev Genet 2000; 1:40-47.
39. Intano GW, McMahan CA, McCarrey JR, Walter RB, McKenna AE, Matsumoto Y, MacInnes MA, Chen DJ, Walter CA. Base excision, repair is limited by different proteins in male germ cell nuclear extracts prepared from young and old mice. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22: 2410-2418.
40. Goukassian D, Gad F, Yaar M, Eller MS, Nehal US, Gilchrest BA. Mechanisms and implications of the age-associated decrease in DNA repair capacity. FASEB J 2000; 14:1325-1334.
41. Bohr VA. Gene specific DNA repair. Carcinogenesis 1991; 12:1983-1992.
42. Mellon I, Spivak G, Hanawalt PC. Selective removal of transcription-blocking DNA damage from the transcribed strand of the mammalian DHFR gene. Cell 1987; 51:241-249.
43. Sassone-Corsi P. Unique chromatin remodeling and transcriptional regulation in spermatogenesis. Science 2002; 296:2176-2178.
44. Meijer M, Smerdon MJ. Accessing DNA damage in chromatin: insights from transcription. Bioessays 1999; 21:596-603.
45. Wilkins RJ, Hart RW. Preferential DNA repair in human cells. Nature 1974; 247:35-36.
46. Hanawalt PC. Transcription-coupled repair and human disease. Science 1994; 266:1957-1958.
47. Ho L, Hanawalt PC. Gene-specific DNA repair in terminally differentiating rat myoblasts. Mutat Res 1991; 255:123-141.
48. Hanawalt PC, Gee R Ho L, Hsu RK, Kane CJ. Genomic heterogeneity of DNA repair. Role in aging? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1992; 663:17-25.
49. Islas AL, Hanawalt PC. DNA repair in the MYC and FMS protooncogenes in ultraviolet light-irradiated human HL60 promyelocytic cells during differentiation. Cancer Res 1995; 55:336-341.