Integration of cell membranes and nanotube transistors

Nano Letters

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 841-845

  Bradley, Keith ^a   Davis, Alona ^a   Gabriel, Jean Christophe P ^a   Gruner G ^a,b  

^a Nanomix Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; CYTOPLASMS; NANOTUBE ELECTRONIC DEVICES; NANOTUBE TRANSISTORS;

BACTERIA; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CARBON NANOTUBES; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PROTEINS; SEMICONDUCTOR MATERIALS; TRANSISTORS;

CELL MEMBRANES;

BACTERIORHODOPSIN; NANOTUBE;

ARTICLE; BIONICS; CELL MEMBRANE; CHEMISTRY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; GENETIC PROCEDURES; HALOBACTERIUM SALINARUM; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; SEMICONDUCTOR; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BACTERIORHODOPSINS; BIONICS; BIOSENSING TECHNIQUES; CELL MEMBRANE; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HALOBACTERIUM SALINARUM; NANOTUBES; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TRANSISTORS;

EID: 19944397818     PISSN: 15306984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/nl050157v     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Willner, I. Science 2002, 298, 2407.
2. Hu, H.; Ni, Y.; Montana, V.; Haddon, R. C.; Parpura, V. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 507.
3. Williams, K. A.; Veenhuizen, P. T. M.; de la Torre, B. G.; Eritja, R.; Dekker, C. Nature 2002, 420, 761.
4. Pantarotto, D.; Partidos, C. D.; Graff, R.; Hoebeke, J.; Briand, J.-P.; Prato, M.; Bianco, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6160.
5. Zheng, M.; Jagota, A.; Strano, M. S.; Santos, A. P.; Barone, P.; Chou, S. G.; Diner, B. A.; Dresselhaus, M. S.; Mclean, R. S.; Onoa, G. B.; Samsonidze, G. G.; Semke, E. D.; Usrey, M.; Walls, D. J. Science 2003, 302, 1545.
6. Chen, R. J.; Bangsaruntip, S.; Drouvalakis, K. A.; Kam, N. W. S.; Shim, M.; Li, Y.; Kim, W.; Utz, P. J.; Dai, H. P. N. A. S. 2003, 100, 4984.
7. Wang, G.; Porschke, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 4632.
8. Richard, C.; Balavoine, F.; Schultz, P.; Ebbesen, T. W.; Mioskowski, C. Science 2003, 300, 775.
9. Besteman, K.; Lee, J.-O.; Wiertz, F. G. M.; Heering, H. A.; Dekker, C. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 727.
10. Bradley, K.; Gabriel, J.-C. P.; Grüner, G. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1353.
11. Miyasaka, T.; Koyama, K.; Itoh, I. Science 1992, 255, 342.
12. Oesterhelt, D.; Stoeckenius, W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1973, 70, 2853.
13. Ermolina, I.; Lewis, A.; Feldman, Y. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 14537.
14. Steinhoff, H.-J.; Mollaaghababa, R.; Altenbach, C.; Hideg, K.; Krebs, M.; Khorana, H. G.; Hubbell, W. L. Science 1994, 266, 105.
15. Várò, G. Acta Biol. Acad. Sci. Hung. 1981, 32, 301.
16. Yi, S.; Safinya, C. R.; Liang, K. S.; Ruppert, A. F.; Rothschild, K. J. Nature 1993, 366, 48.
17. Tans, S. J.; Verschueren, A. R. M.; Dekker, C. Nature 1998, 393, 49.
18. Durkop, T.; Getty, S. A.; Cobas, E.; Fuhrer, M. S. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 35.
19. Kim, W.; Javey, A.; Vermesh, O.; Wang, Q.; Li, Y.; Dai, H. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 193.
20. Tans, S. J.; Dekker, C. Nature 2000, 404, 834.
21. Freitag, M.; Radosavljevic, M.; Zhou, Y.; Johnson, A. T.; Smith, W. F. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 3326.
22. Bockrath, M.; Cobden, D. H.; McEuen, P. L.; Chopra, N. G.; Zettl, A.; Thess, A.; Smalley, R. E. Science 1997, 275, 1922.
23. Javey, A.; Kim, H.; Brink, M.; Wang, Q.; Ural, A.; Guo, J.; McIntyre, P.; McEuen, P.; Lundstrom, M.; Dai, H. Nat. Mater. 2002, 1, 241.
24. Bradley, K.; Gabriel, J.-C. P.; Briman, M.; Star, A.; Grüner, G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 218301.
25. This assumption, that the mixed-orientation film contains equal amounts of cytoplasmic and extracellular orientations, is justified by our observations. First, we have already concluded that our deposition method produces similar coverages for both orientations. Therefore, neither orientation adsorbs preferentially compared to the other, and a random mixture should contain equal amounts of each. Second, the threshold shift observed with mixed orientation correlates with the expectation from a 50/50% mixture. The two oriented depositions cause +2.2 V and -0.4 V of threshold shift. For a 50/50% mixture, we expect a net threshold shift of (1/2)(2.2-0.4) V, or +0.9 V. This value agrees well with the value observed with mixed orientation, 1.0 ±0.2 V. From these two observations, we conclude that the mixed-orientation film is in fact a 50/50% mixture.
26. Ehrenberg, B.; Berezin, Y. Biophys. J. 1984, 45, 663.
27. 24 which is too weak to explain the charge induced in our devices.
28. Koyama, K.; Yamaguchi, N.; Miyasaka, T. Science 1994, 265, 762.
29. Bradley, K.; Gabriel, J.-C. P.; Briman, M.; Star, A.; Grüner, G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 218301.