Flowering phenology and sexual allocation in single-mutation lineages of Arabidopsis thaliana

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 970-978

  Baker, Angela M ^a   Burd, Martin ^a   Climie, Kylie M ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Floral induction mutants; Flowering time; Fruit mass; Hermaphroditic angiosperms; Sex allocation; Trade offs

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLOWERING; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PHENOLOGY; SEX ALLOCATION;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MARTES PENNANTI;

EID: 19544386431     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01036.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aarssen, L. W., and M. J. Claus. 1992. Genotypic variation in fecundity allocation in Arabidopsis thaliana, J. Ecol. 80:109-114.
2. Araki, T., and Y. Komeda. 1993. Analysis of the role of the late-flowering locus, GI, in the flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 3:231-239.
3. Ashman, T.-L., and M. S. Hitchens. 2000. Dissecting the cause of variation in intra-inflorescence allocation in a sexually polymorphic species, Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 87:197-204.
4. Bazzaz, F. A., R. W. Carlson, and J. L. Harper. 1979. Contribution to reproductive effort by photosynthesis of flowers and fruits. Nature 279:554-555.
5. Brunet, J. 1996. Male reproductive success and variation in fruit and seed set in Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae). Ecology 77:2458-2471.
6. Burd, M., and T. F. H. Allen. 1988. Sex allocation in wind-pollinated plants. Evolution 42:403-407.
7. Burd, M., and H. S. Callahan. 2000. What does the male function hypothesis claim? J. Evol. Biol. 13:735-742.
8. Burd, M., and G. Head. 1992. Phenological aspects of male and female function in hermaphroditic plants. Am. Nat. 140:305-324.
9. Campbell, D. R. 1997. Genetic correlation between biomass allocation to male and female functions in a natural population of Ipomopsis aggregata. Heredity 79:606-614.
10. _. 2000. Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:227-232.
11. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1981. Allocation of resources to male and female function in hermaphrodites. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 15:57-74.
12. _. 1987. The effect of investment in attractive structures on allocation to male and female functions in plants. Evolution 41:948-968.
13. Charnov, E. L. 1979. Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:2480-2484.
14. _. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
15. Gruden, R. W., and D. L. Lyon. 1985. Patterns of biomass allocation to male and female functions in plants with different mating systems. Oecologia 66:299-306.
16. Day, T., and L. W. Aarssen. 1997. A time commitment hypothesis for size-dependent gender allocation. Evolution 51:988-993.
17. de Jong, T. J., P. G. L. Klinkhamer, and M. C. J. Rademaker. 1999. How geitonogamous selfing affects sex allocation in hermaphroditic plants. J. Evol. Biol. 12:166-176.
18. Dorn, L. A., and T. Mitchell-Olds. 1991. Genetics of Brassica campestris 1. Genetic constraints on evolution of life-history characters. Evolution 45:371-379.
19. Eckhart, V. M., and F. S. Chapin. 1997. Nutrient sensitivity of the cost of male function in gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84:1092-1098.
20. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
21. Geber, M. A., and E. L. Charnov. 1986. Sex allocation in hermaphrodites with partial overlap in male/female resource inputs. J. Theor. Biol. 118:33-43.
22. Goldman, D. A., and M. F. Willson. 1986. Sex allocation in functionally hermaphroditic plants: a review and critique. Bot. Rev. 52:157-194.
23. Greef, J. M., J. D. Nason, and S. G. Compton. 2001. Skewed paternity and sex allocation in hermaphroditic plants and animals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:2143-2147.
24. Hamilton, W. D. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477-488.
25. Hensel, L. L., M. A. Nelson, T. A. Richmond, and A. B. Bleeker. 1994. The fate of inflorescence meristems is controlled by developing fruits in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 106:863-876.
26. Herre, E. A. 1985. Sex ratio adjustment in fig wasps. Nature 228:896-897.
27. Hunt, R. 1978. Plant growth analysis. Arnold, London.
28. Ishii, H. S., and S. Sakai. 2002. Temporal variation in floral display size and individual floral sex allocation in racemes of Narthecium asiaticum (Liliaceae). Am. J. Bot. 89:441-446.
29. Janzen, D. H. 1976. Effect of defoliation on fruit-bearing branches of the Kentucky coffee tree, Gymnocladus dioicus (Leguminosae). Am. Midl. Nat. 95:474-478.
30. Jonsson, K. I. 1997. Capital and income breeding as alternative tactics of resource use in reproduction. Oikos 78:57-66.
31. Klinkhamer, P. G. L., T. J. de Jong, and H. Metz. 1997. Sex and size in cosexual plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:260-265.
32. Koelewijn, H. P., and M. P. H. Hunscheid. 2000. Intraspecific variation in sex allocation in hermaphroditic Plantago coronopus (L.). J. Evol. Biol. 13:302-315.
33. Lloyd, D. G. 1984. Gender allocations in outcrossing cosexual plants. Pp. 227-300 in R. Dirzo and J. Sarukhán, eds. Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
34. Lloyd, D. G., and K. S. Bawa. 1984. Modification of the gender of seed plants in varying conditions. Evol. Biol. 17:255-338.
35. Macknight, R., M. Duroux, R. Laurie, P. Dijkwel, G. Simpson, and C. Dean. 2002. Functional significance of the alternative transcript processing of the Arabidopsis floral promoter FCA. Plant Cell 14:877-888.
36. Metcalf, J. C., K. E. Rose, and M. Rees. 2003. Evolutionary demography of monocarpic perennials. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:471-480.
37. Mitchell-Olds, T. 1996. Genetic constraints on life-history evolution: quantitative-trait loci influencing growth and flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 50:140-145.
38. Morgan, M. 1993. Fruit to flower ratios and trade-offs in size and number. Evol. Ecol. 7:219-232.
39. Park, D. H., D. E. Somers, Y. S. Kim, Y. H. Choy, H. K. Lim, M. S. Soh, H. J. Kim, S. A. Kay, and N. G. Nam. 1999. Control of circadian rhythms and photoperiodic flowering by the Arabidopsis GIGANTEA gene. Science 285:1579-1582.
40. Poot, P. 1997. Reproductive allocation and resource compensation in male-sterile and hermaphroditic plants of Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84:1256-1265.
41. Putterill, J. 2001. Flowering in time: genes controlling photoperiodic response in Arabidopsis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 356:1761-1767.
42. Rademaker, M. C., and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1999. Size-dependent sex allocation in Cynoglossum officinale for different genotypes under uniform favourable conditions. Plant Biol. 1:108-114.
43. Reekie, E. G., and F. A. Bazzaz. 1987. Reproductive effort in plants. 3. Effect of reproduction on vegetative activity. Am. Nat. 129:907-919.
44. Sakai, S., and Y. Harada. 1998. Does the trade-off between growth and reproduction select for female-biased sexual allocation in cosexual plants? Evolution 52:1204-1207.
45. Sandmeier, M., and I. Dajoz. 2000. Flowering phenology and gender variation in Pennisetum typhoides. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 161:81-87.
46. Sato, T. 2000. Effects of phenological constraints on sex allocation in cosexual monocarpic plants. Oikos 88:309-318.
47. _. 2004. Size-dependent sex allocation in hermaphroditic plants: the effects of resource pool and self-incompatibility. J. Theor. Biol. 227:265-275.
48. Schoen, D. J. 1982. Male reproductive effort and breeding system in an hermaphroditic plant. Oecologia 53:255-257.
49. Seger, J., and V. M. Eckhart. 1996. Evolution of sexual systems and sex allocation in plants when growth and reproduction overlap. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:833-841.
50. Simons, A. M., and M. O. Johnston. 2003. Suboptimal timing of reproduction in Lobelia inflata may be a conservative bet-hedging strategy. J. Evol. Biol. 16:233-243.
51. Spears, E. E., and P. G. May. 1988. Effect of defoliation on gender expression and fruit set in Passiflora incarnata. Am. J. Bot. 75:1842-1847.
52. Tuomi, J., T. Vuorisalo, P. Niemela, and E. Haukioja. 1989. Effects of localized defoliations on female inflorescences in mountain birch, Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa. Can. J. Bot. 67:334-338.
53. van Tienderen, P. H., I. Hammad, and A. R. Zwaal. 1996. Pleiotropic effects of flowering time genes in the annual crucifer Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 83:169-174.
54. Wright, S. I., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1999. Size-dependent gender modification in a hermaphroditic perennial herb. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:225-232.
55. Zhang, J., and M. J. Lechowicz. 1994. Correlation between time of flowering and phenotypic plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 81:1336-1342.