Effects of phenological constraints on sex allocation in cosexual monocarpic plants

Oikos

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 309-318

  Sato, Toshihiko ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; PHENOLOGY; PLANT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SEX ALLOCATION;

EID: 0033995014     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.880209.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Benner, B. L. and Bazzaz, F. A. 1988. Carbon and mineral element accumulation and allocation in two annual plant species in response to timing of nutrient addition. - J. Ecol. 76: 19-40.
2. Brunet, J. 1992. Sex allocation in hermaphroditic plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 79-84.
3. Bind, M. and Head, G. 1992. Phenological aspects of male and female function in hermaphroditic plants. - Am. Nat. 140: 305-324.
4. Charnov, E. L. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Charlesworth, D. and Charlesworth, B. 1981. Allocation of resources to male and female functions in hermaphrodites. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 15: 57-74.
6. Cohen, D. and Dukas, R. 1990. The optimal number of female flowers and the fruits-to-flowers ratio in plants under pollination and resources limitation. Am. Nat. 135: 218-241.
7. Eis, S., Garman, E. H. and Ebel, L. F. 1965. Relation between cone production and diameter increment of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb) Franco), grand fir (Abies grandis Dougl.), and western white pine (Pinus monticola Dougl.), - Can. J. Bot. 43: 1553-1559.
8. Ernst, W. H. O. 1983. Element nutrition of two contrasted dune annuals. J. Ecol. 71: 197-209.
9. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The general theory of natural selection. -Clarendon, Oxford.
10. Geber, M. A. and Charnov, E. L. 1986. Sex allocation in hermaphrodites with partial overlap in male female resource inputs. J. Theor. Biol. 118: 33-43.
11. Goldman, D. A. and Willson, M. 1986. Sex allocation in functionally hermaphroditic plants: a review and critique. - Bot. Rev. 52: 157-194.
12. Inoue, K. 1990. Evolution of mating systems in island populations of Campanula microdonta: pollinator availability hypothesis. Plant Species Biol. 5: 57-64.
13. Jong, T. J. de and Klinkhamer, P. G. L. 1989. Size-dependency of sex-allocation in hermaphroditic, monocarpic plants. - Funct. Ecol. 3: 201-206.
14. Jong, T. J. de, Klinkhamer, P. G. L., Nell, H. W. and Troelstra, S. R. 1987. Growth and nutrient accumulation of the biennials Cirsium vulgare and Cynoglossum officinale under nutrient-rich conditions. - Oikos 48: 62-72.
15. Klinkhamer, P. G. L., Jong, T. J. de and Metz, H. 1997. Sex and size in cosexual plants. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 260-265.
16. Kozlowski, J. and Stearns, S. C. 1989. Hypothesis for the production of excess zygotes: models of bet-hedging and selective abortion. - Evolution 43: 1369-1377.
17. Kudo, G. 1993. Size-dependent resource allocation pattern and gender variation of Anemone debilis Fisch. - Plant Species Biol. 8: 29-34.
18. Lloyd, D. G. 1984. Gender allocation in outcrossing cosexual plants. - In: Dirzo, R. and Sarukhan, J. (eds), Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland. MA, pp. 277-300.
19. Lovett Doust, J. and Cavers, P. J. 1982. Biomass allocation in hermaphrodite flowers. - Can. J. Bot. 60: 2530-2534.
20. Lubbers, A. E. and Lechowicz, M. J. 1989. Effects of leaf removal on reproduction vs. belowground storage in Trillium grundiflorum. - Ecology 70: 85-96.
21. Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The evolution of sex. - Cambridge Univ. Press. Cambridge.
22. Owens, J. N. 1969. The relative importance of initiation and early development on cone production in Douglas fir. - Can. J. Bot. 47: 1039-1049.
23. Powell, G. R. 1977. Patterns of development in Abies balsamea crowns and effects of megastrobilus production on shoots and buds. - Can. J. For. Res. 7: 498-509.
24. Rodrigues Pereira, A. S. 1978. Effects of leaf removal on yield components in sunflower. - Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 26: 133-144.
25. Sakai, S. 1997. Reproductive strategy of plants. In: Iwasa. Y. (ed.), Mathematical ecology. Kyoritsu Press, Tokyo, pp. 145-156 (in Japanese).
26. Sakai, S. and Harada, Y. 1998. Does the trade-off between growth and reproduction select for female-biased sexual allocation in cosexual plants? - Evolution 32: 1204-1207.
27. Schemske, D. W. 1984. Population structurte and local selection in Impatiens-pallida (Balsaminaceae), a selfing annual. - Evolution 38: 817-832.
28. Schoen, D. J. 1982. Male reproductive effort and breeding system in an hermaphroditic plant. - Oecologia 53: 255-257.
29. Seger, J. and Eckhart, V. M. 1996. Evolution of sexual systems and sex allocation in plants when growth and reproduction overlap. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 833-841.
30. Silvertown, J. W. and Lovett Doust, J. 1993. Introduction to plant population biology. - Blackwell Scientific. Oxford.
31. Stephenson, A. G. and Winsor, J. A. 1986. Lotus corniculatus regulates offspring quality through selective fruit abortion. - Evolution 40: 453-458.
32. Sutherland, S. and Delph, L. F. 1984. On the importance of male fitness in plants: patterns of fruit-set. - Ecology 65: 1093-1104.