How geitonogamous selfing affects sex allocation in hermaphrodite plants

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 166-176

  De Jong, T J ^a   Klinkhamer, P G L ^a   Rademaker, M C J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dioecy; Geitonogamy; Pollination; Selfing; Sex allocation

Indexed keywords

HERMAPHRODITE; PLANT; SELFING; SEX ALLOCATION;

EID: 0032895978     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00001.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Abrams, P.A., Matsuda, H. and Harada, Y. 1993. Evolutionary unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima of continuous traits. Evol. Ecol. 7: 465-487.
2. Bateman, A.J. 1947. Contamination in seed crops III. Relation with isolation distance. Heredity, 1: 303-336.
3. Bawa, K.S. 1980. The evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 15-40.
4. Bawa, K.S. 1994. Pollinators of tropical angiosperms: a reassessment? No, not yet. Am. J. Bot. 81: 456-460.
5. Bickel, A.M. and Freeman, D.C. 1993. Effects of pollen vector and plant geometry on floral sex ratio in monoecious plants. Am. Midl. Nat. 130: 239-247.
6. Brunet, J. 1992. Sex allocation in hermaphrodite plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 79-84.
7. Bullock, S.H. 1994. Wind pollination of neotropical dioecious trees. Biotropica, 26: 172-179.
8. Charlesworth, B. and Charlesworth, D. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 112: 975-997.
9. Charlesworth, D. and Charlesworth, B. 1981. Allocation of resources to male and female functions in hermaphrodites. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 19:57-74.
10. Charlesworth, D. and Morgan, M.T. 1991. Allocation of resources to sex functions in flowering plants. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B, 332: 91-102.
11. Charnov, E.L. 1982. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
12. Charnov, E.L. 1987. On sex allocation and selfing in higher plants. Evol. Ecol. 1: 30-36.
13. Crawford, T.J. 1984. What is a population? In: Evolutionary Ecology (B. Shorrocks, ed.), pp. 135-173. Blackwell, Oxford.
14. Cruden, R.W. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems in flowering plants. Evolution, 31: 32-46.
15. Dominée, B. 1981. Rôles du milieu et du génotype dans le régime de la reproduction de Thymus vulgaris L. Acta Oecol. Oecol. Plant. 2: 137-147.
16. Dudash, M.R. 1991. Plant size effects on female and male function in hermaphrodite Sabatia angularis (Gentianaceae). Ecology, 72: 1004-1012.
17. Fisher, R.A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substitution. Ann. Eugen. 11: 53-63.
18. Fox, J.F. 1985. Incidence of dioecy in relation to growth form, pollination and dispersal. Oecologia, 67: 244-249.
19. Freeman, D.C., Harper, K.T. and Ostler, W.K. 1980. Ecology of plant dioecy in the intermountain region of western North America and California. Oecologia, 44: 410-417.
20. Freeman, D.C., Lovett Doust, J., El-Keblawy, A., Miglia, K.J. and McArthur, E.D. 1997. Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. Bot. Rev. 63: 65-92.
21. Geritz, S.A.H., Kisdi, É., Meszéna, G. and Metz, J.A.J. 1998. Evolutionary singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12: 35-57.
22. Hamilton, W.D. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science, 156: 477-488.
23. Harder, L.D. and Barrett, S.C.H. 1995a. Mating costs of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature, 373: 512-515.
24. Harder, L.D. and Barrett, S.C.H. 1995b. Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In: Floral Biology (D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett, eds), pp. 140-190. Chapman and Hall, New York.
25. Harvey, P.H. 1984. Intrademic group selection and the sex ratio. In: Behavioural Ecology, Ecological Consequences of Adaptive Behaviour (R. M. Sibly and R. H. Smith, eds), pp. 59-74. Blackwell, Oxford.
26. Hessing, M.B. 1988. Geitonogamous pollination and its consequences in Geranium caespitosum. Am. J. Bot. 75: 1324-1333.
27. Holsinger, K.E. 1991. Mass-action models of plant mating systems: the evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. Am. Nat. 138: 606-622.
28. Husband, B.C. and Schemske, D.W. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution, 50: 54-70.
29. de Jong, T.J. and Klinkhamer, P.G.L. 1989. Limiting factors for seed production in Cynoglossum officinale. Oecologia, 80: 167-172.
30. de Jong, T.J. and Klinkhamer P.G.L. 1994. Plant size and reproductive success through female and male function. J. Ecol. 82: 399-402.
31. de Jong, T.J., Klinkhamer, P.G.L. and van Staalduinen, M.J. 1992. The consequences of pollination biology for mass vs. extended blooming. Funct. Ecol. 6: 606-615.
32. Kay, Q.O.N. and Stevens, D.P. 1986. The frequency, distribution and reproductive biology of dioecious species in the native flora of Britain and Ireland. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 92: 39-64.
33. Klinkhamer, P.G.L. and de Jong, T.J. 1987. Plant size and seed production in the monocarpic Cynoglossum officinale. New Phytol. 106: 773-783.
34. Klinkhamer, P.G.L., de Jong, T.J. and Metz, H. 1997. Sex and size in cosexual plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 260-265.
35. Klinkhamer, P.G.L., de Jong, T.J. and de Bruijn, G.J. 1989. Plant size and pollinator visitation in Cynoglossum officinale. Oikos, 54: 201-204.
36. Lloyd, D.G. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica, 45: 325-339.
37. Lloyd, D.G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113: 67-79.
38. Lloyd, D.G. 1984. Gender allocations in outcrossing cosexual plants. In: Perspectives on Plant Population Biology (R. Dirzo and J. Sarukhan, eds), pp. 277-300. Sinauer, Sunderland.
39. Lloyd, D.G. 1987a. Allocations to pollen, seeds and pollination mechanisms in self-fertilizing plants. Funct. Ecol. 1: 83-89.
40. Lloyd, D.G. 1987b. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113: 67-79.
41. Lloyd, D.G. 1992. Self-and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: 370-380.
42. Lloyd, D.G. and Schoen, D.J. 1992. Self-and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: 358-369.
43. Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
44. Muenchow, G.E. 1987. Is dioecy associated with fleshy fruit? Am. J. Bot. 74: 287-293.
45. Parker, G.A. 1984. Evolutionarily stable strategies. In: Behavioural Ecology (J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds), pp. 30-61. Blackwell, Oxford.
46. Parker, I.M. 1995. Reproductive allocation and the fitness consequences of selfing in two sympatric species of Epilobium (Onagraceae) with contrasting mating systems. Am. J. Bot. 82: 1007-1016.
47. Poot, P. 1996. Ecophysiological aspects of maintenance of male sterility in Plantago lanceolata. PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
48. Rademaker, M.C.J., de Jong, T.J. and Klinkhamer, P.G.L. 1997. Pollen dynamics in Echium vulgare. Funct. Ecol. 11: 554-563.
49. Renner, S.S. and Feil, J.P. 1993. Pollinators of tropical dioecious angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 80: 1100-1107.
50. Renner, S.S. and Ricklefs, R.E. 1996. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Am. J. Bot. 82: 596-606.
51. Sakai, A.K., Wagner, W.L., Ferguson, D.M. and Herbst, D.R. 1995. Biogeographical correlates of dioecy in the Hawaiian flora. Ecology, 76: 2530-2543.
52. Schoen, D.J. 1982. Male reproductive effort and breeding system in a hermaphrodite plant. Oecologia, 53: 255-257.
53. Schoen, D.J. and Lloyd, D.G. 1992. Self-and cross-fertilization in plants. III. Methods for studying modes and functional aspects of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: 381-393.
54. Schoen, D.J., Morgan, M.T. and Bataillon, T. 1996. How does self-pollination evolve? Inferences from floral ecology and molecular genetic variation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 351: 1281-1290.
55. Seger, J. and Eckhart, V.M. 1996. Evolution of sexual systems and sex allocation in plants when growth and reproduction overlap. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 263: 833-841.
56. Snow, A.A., Spira, T.P., Simpson, R. and Klips, R.A. 1995. The ecology of geitonogamous pollination. In: Floral Biology (D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett, eds), pp. 191-216. Chapman and Hall, New York.
57. Steiner, K.E. 1988. Dioecism and its correlates in the Cape flora of South Africa. Am. J. Bot. 75: 1742-1754.
58. Thomson, J.D. 1986. Pollen transport and deposition by bumble bees in Erythronium: influences of floral nectar and bee grooming. J. Ecol. 46: 333-349.
59. Thomson, J.D. and Barrett, S.C.H. 1981. Selection for outcrossing, sexual selection, and the evolution of dioecy in plants. Am. Nat. 118: 443-449.
60. Thomson, J.D. and Brunet, J. 1990. Hypotheses for the evolution of dioecy in seed plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 11-16.
61. Vrieling, K., Saumitou-Laprade, P., Meelis, E. and Epplen, J.T. 1997. Multilocus fingerprints in the plant Cynoglossum officinale L. and their use in the estimation of selfing. Mol. Ecol. 6: 587-593.
62. Willson, M.F. 1979. Sexual selection in plants. Am. Nat, 113: 777-790.