Modified Constraint-Induced Therapy for Hemiparesis: A Review

Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-38

  Page, Stephen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Exercise training; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARM; BRAIN INJURY; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; LEARNING; MODIFIED CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTPATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REIMBURSEMENT; REVIEW; STROKE; THEORY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 1942469274     PISSN: 08962960     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v16.i1.20     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Traumatic brain injury, in the United States: a report to Congress. Atlanta: CDC; 1999.
2. American Heart Association. Stroke Statistics. Available from: URL: http://www.americanheart.org/Heart_and_Stroke_A_Z_Guide/strokes.html; 2000.
3. Carr J, Shepherd R. Neurological rehabilitation: Optimizing motor performance. Oxford (UK): Butterworth-Heineman; 1998.
4. Ottenbacher K. Cerebral vascular accident: Some characteristics of occupational therapy evaluation forms. Am J Occup Ther 1980;34:268-71.
5. Wallen MA, Mackay S, Duff SM, McCartney LC, O'Flaherty SJ. Upper-limb function in Australian children with traumatic brain injury: A controlled, prospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:642-9.
6. Duncan PW. Synthesis of intervention trails to improve motor recovery following stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997;3:1-20.
7. Newell A, Rosenbloom PS. Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In: Anderson JR, editor. Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum; 1981. p. 1-55.
8. Lincoln NB, Willis D, Phillips SA, Juby LC, Berman P. Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients. Stroke 1996;27:18-23.
9. Mackay F, Ada L, Heard R, Adams R. Stroke rehabilitation: are highly structured units more conducive to physical activity than less structured units? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1066-70.
10. Keith RA, Cowell KS. Time use of stroke patients in three rehabilitation hospitals. Soc Sci Med 1987;24:524-33.
11. Wolf SL. Approaches to facilitating movement control. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997;3:v-vi.
12. Page SJ. Intensity versus task-specificity following stroke: how important is intensity? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:730-2.
13. Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995;130:59-68.
14. Bach y Rita P. Brain plasticity as a basis of the development of rehabilitation procedures fo hemiplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med 1982;13:73-81.
15. Tower SS. Pyramidal lesions in the monkey. Brain 1940;63:36-90.
16. Lashley KS. Studies of cerebral function in learning: V. The retention of motor areas in primates. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1924;12:249-76.
17. Taub E, Ellman SJ, Berman AJ. Deafferentation in monkeys: Effect on conditioned grasp response. Science 1966;151:593-4.
18. Taub E. Motor behavior following deafferentation in the developing and motorically mature monkey. In: Herman R, Grillner S, Ralston HJ, Stein PSG, Stuart D, editors. Neural control of locomotion. New York: Plenum; 1976. p. 675-705.
19. Azrin NH, Holz WC. Punishment. In: Honig WK, editor. Operant behavior: areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1966. p. 380-447.
20. Lassek AM. Inactivation of voluntary motor function following rhizotomy. J Neuropathol Exp Studies 1953;2:83-7.
21. Taub E, Perrella PN, Barro G. Behavioral development following forelimb deafferentation on day of birth in monkeys with and without blinding. Science 1973;181:959-60.
22. Taub E. Movement in nonhuman primates deprived of somatosensory feedback. In: American Congress of Sports Medicine. Exercise and sports science reviews. Santa Barbara: Journal Publishing Affiliates; 1977. p. 335-74.
23. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, editor. Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical applications. New York: Williams & Wilkins; 1980. p. 371-401.
24. Ince LP. Escape and avoidance conditioning of response in the plegic arm of stroke patients: A preliminary study. Psychon Sci 1969;16:49-50.
25. Halberstam JL, Zeretsky HH, Brucker BB, Gutman A. Avoidance conditioning of motor responses in elderly brain-damaged patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1971;52:318-28.
26. Wolf S, LeCraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989;104:125-32.
27. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW III, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347-54.
28. Miltner W, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication. Stroke 1999;30:586-92.
29. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999;30:2369-75.
30. Blanton S, Wolf SL. An application of upper extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther 1999;79:847-53.
31. Taub E. Constraint-induced movement therapy and massed practice. Stroke 2000;31:986-88.
32. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:406-412.
33. Flor H, Elbert S, Knecht C, Wienbruch C, Pantev C, Birbaumer N, Larbig W, Taub R. Phantom limb pain as a perceptual correlate of massive cortical reorganization in upper limb amputees. Nature 1995;375:482-544.
34. Elbert T, Flor H, Birbaumer N, Knecht S, Hampson S, Larbig W, Taub E. Extensive reorganization of the somatosensory cortex in adult humans after nervous system injury. Neuroreport 1994;5:2593-97.
35. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, Miltner WH, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000;31:1210-1216.
36. Schaumburg S, Pierce S, Gaffney K, Gershkoff A. Constraint-induced therapy: moving research into practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Orlando, FL, October 16, 1999.
37. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Bond Q, Johnston MV. Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:55-60.
38. Brinkmann J, Hoskins T. Physical conditioning and altered self-concept in rehabilitated hemiplegic patients. Phys Ther 1979;59:859-65.
39. Ryan A, Dobrovolny L, Silver KH, Smith GV, Macko RF. Cardiovascular fitness after stroke: role of muscle mass and gait deficit severity. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2000;9:185-91.
40. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor learning and performance: from principles to practice. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 1999.
41. Bach y Rita P. Conceptual issues relevant to current and future neurologic rehabilitation. In: Levin H, Grafman J, editors. Neuroplasticity and reorganization of function after brain injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 357-79.
42. Schallert T, Bland ST, Leasure JL. Motor rehabilitation, use-related neural events, and reorganization of the brain after injury. In Levin H, Grafman J, editors. Conceptual issues relevant to present and future neurologic rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 145-67.
43. Classen J, Liepert J, Wise SP, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol 1998;79:1117-23.
44. Liepert J, Terborg C, Weiller C. Motor plasticity induced by synchronized thumb and foot movements. Exp Brain Res 1999;125:435-9.
45. Dean CM, Shepherd RB. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 1997;28:722-8.
46. Winstein CJ, Rose DK. Recovery and arm use after stroke. J Cerebrovasc Dis 2001;10:197.
47. Page SJ, Sisto SA, Johnston MV, Levine P, Hughes M. Modified constraint induced therapy in subacute stroke: a case study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:286-90.
48. Page SJ, Sisto SA, Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:870-5.
49. Page SJ, Sisto SA, Johnston MV, Levine P, Hughes M. Modified constraint induced therapy. A randomized, feasibility and efficacy study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001;38:583-90.
50. Page SJ, Sisto S, Johnston MV, Levine P. Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:290-95.
51. Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, McGrath R. A promising, clinically-practical intervention for hemiparesis after chronic stroke. Manuscript submitted.
52. Page SJ, Levine P. Forced use after TBI: promoting plasticity and function through practice. Brain Inj 2003;17:675-84.
53. Page SJ, Elovic E, Levine P, Sisto SA. Modified constraint-induced therapy and botulinum toxin A: a promising combination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:76-80.
54. Caraugh J, Light K, Kim S, Thigpen, Behrman A. Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: Recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation. Stroke 2000;31:1360-4.
55. Weiss T, Hansen E, Rost R. Mental practice of motor skills used in poststroke rehabilitation has own effects on central nervous activation. Int J Neurosci 1994;78:157-66.
56. Taub E. New discovery equals change in clinical practice. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:vii-viii.