Forced use after TBI: Promoting plasticity and function through practice

Brain Injury

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 675-684

  Page, Stephen ^a   Levine, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; SCORING SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0038489070     PISSN: 02699052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0269905031000107160     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Newell, A. and Rosenbloom, P. S.: Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In: J. R. Anderson (editor) Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), pp. 1-55, 1981.
2. Lincoln, N. B., Willis, D., Phillips, S. A. et al.: Comparison of rehabilitation practice on hospital wards for stroke patients. Stroke, 27: 18-23, 1996.
3. MacKay, F., Ada, L., Heard, R. et al.: Stroke rehabilitation: Are highly structured units more conductive to physical activity than less structured units? Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 77: 1066-1070, 1996.
4. Keith, R. A. and Cowell, K. S.: Time use of stroke patients in three rehabilitation hospitals. Social Science Medicine, 24: 524-533, 1987.
5. MacKay, L. E., Bernstein, B. A., Chapman, P. E. et al.: Early intervention in severe head injury: Long-term benefits of a formalized program. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 73: 635-641, 1992.
6. Reynolds, W. E., Page, S. J. and Johnston, M. V.: Coordinated and adequately funded state streams for rehabilitation of newly injured persons with TBI. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16: 34-46, 2001.
7. Wolf, S. L.: Approaches to facilitating movement control. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 3: v-vi, 1997.
8. Taub, E., Grillner, S., Ralston, H. J. and Stein, P. S. G.: Motor behavior following deafferentiation in the developing and motorically mature monkey. In: H. R. Griliner et al. (editors) Neural Control of Locomotion (New York: Plenum), pp. 676-705, 1976.
9. Wolf, S., LeCraw, D. E., Barton, L. A. et al.: Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Experimental Neurology, 104: 125-132, 1989.
10. Taub, B., Miller, N. E., Novack, T. A. et al.: Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 74: 347-354, 1993.
11. Miltner, W., Bauder, H., Sommer, M. et al.: Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication. Stroke, 30: 586-592, 1999.
12. Van Der Lee, J. H., Wagenaar, R. C., Lankhorst, G. J. et al.: Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: Results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke, 30: 2369-2375, 1999.
13. Elbert, T., Flor, H., Birbaumer, N. et al.: Extensive reorganization of the somatosensory cortex in adult humans after nervous system injury. Neuroreport, 20: 2593-2597, 1994.
14. Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F. et al.: Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery following ischemic infarct. Science, 272: 1791-1794, 1996.
15. Butefisch, C., Hummeisheim, H., Denzler, P. et al.: Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. Journal of Neurological Science, 130: 59-68, 1995.
16. Liepert, J., Bauder, H., Wolfgang, H. R. et al.: Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke, 31: 1210-1216, 2000.
17. Taub, E.: New discovery equals change in clinical practice. Journal of Rehabilitation Research Development, 36: vii-viii, 1999.
18. Blanton, S. and Wolf, S. L.: An application of upper extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke. Physical Therapy, 79: 847-853, 1999.
19. Schaumburg, S., Pierce, S., Gafthey, K. et al.: Constraint-induced therapy: Moving research into practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Orlando, FL, 16 October 1999.
20. Page, S. J., Levine, P., Sisto, S. et al.: Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16: 55-60, 2002.
21. Brinkmann, J. and Hoskins, T.: Physical conditioning and altered self-concept in rehabilitated hemiplegic patients. Physical Therapy, 59: 859-865, 1979.
22. Taub, E., Uswatte, G. and Pidikiti, R.: Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - A clinical review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research Development, 36: 237-251, 1999.
23. Classen, J., Liepert, J., Wise, S. P. et al.: Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79: 1117-1123, 1998.
24. Liepert, J., Terborg, C. and Weiller, C.: Motor plasticity induced by synchronized thumb and foot movements. Experimental Brain Research, 125: 435-439, 1999.
25. Winstein, C. J., Rose, D. K. et al.: Recovery and rehabilitation of arm use after stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, 10: 197, 2001.
26. Page, S. J., Sisto, S. A., Johnston, M. V. et al.: Modified constraint induced therapy in subacute stroke: A case study. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 83: 286-290, 2002.
27. Page, S. J., Sisto, S. A., Johnston, M. V. et al.: Modified constraint induced therapy: A randomized, feasibility arid efficacy study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research Development, 38: 583-590, 2001.
28. Miller, T. R. et al.: Databook on Nonfatal Injury: Incidence, Costs, and Consequences (Washington, DC: Urban Institute), 1995.
29. National Institutes of Health: Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. NIH Consensus Statement, 16: 1-41, 1998.
30. Wallen, M. A., Mackay, S., Duff, S. M. et al.: Upper-limb function in Australian children with traumatic brain injury: A controlled, prospective study. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 82: 642-649, 2001.
31. Lyle, R. C.: A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 4: 483-492, 1981.
32. Van Der Lee, J. H., De Groot, V., Beckerman, H. et al.: The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: A practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 82: 14-19, 2001.
33. Bohannon, R. W. and Smith, M. B.: Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Physical Therapy, 67: 206-207, 1987.
34. Page, S. J., Sisto, S. A. and Levine, P.: Modified constraint-induced therapy in chronic stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 81: 870-875, 2002.