Identity and genre literacy in high-school students’ experimental reports

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 607-624

  Knain, Erick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18644371702     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2005.10738226     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BOEKAERTS, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457.
2. COBERN, W.W. and AIKENHEAD, G.S. (1998). Cultural aspects of learning science. In B.J. Fraser and K.G. Tobin (eds.) International Handbook of Science Education (Vol. 2) (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 39–52.
3. HALLIDAY, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd edn) (London and Melbourne: Edward Arnold).
4. HALLIDAY, M.A.K. (1998). Things and relations: Regrammaticing experience as technical knowledge. In J.R. Martin and R. Veel (eds.) Reading Science. Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science (London and New York: Routledge), 185–235.
5. HART, C., MULHALL, P., BERRY, A., LOUGHRAN, J. and GUNSTONE, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655–675.
6. IVANCI[caron], R. (1998). Writing and Identity (Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing).
7. KEYS, C.W. (1999). Revializing instruction in scientific genres: connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83(2), 115–130.
8. KEYS, C.W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eight grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 676–690.
9. KEYS, C.W., HAND, B.M., PRAIN, V. and COLLINS, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065–1084.
10. KNAIN, E. (2001). Ideologies in school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23(2), 319–329.
11. KRESS, G. and VAN LEEUWEN, T. (1996). Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design (London and New York: Routledge).
12. KRESS, G., JEWITT, C., OGBORN, J. and TSATSARELIS, C. (2001). Multimodal Teaching and Learning. The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom (London and New York: Continuum).
13. LEACH, J. (1999). Learning science in the laboratory. The importance of epistemological understanding. In A.C. Paulsen (ed.) Practical Work in Science Education (Roskilde and Dordrecht: Roskilde University Press, Kluwer Academic Publishers), 134–147.
14. LEMKE, J.L. (1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values (Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing).
15. LEMKE, J.L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.
16. MILES, M.B. and HUBERMAN, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd edn) (Thousand Oaks, CA and London: Sage Publications).
17. MILLER, C.R. (1994). Genre as social action. In A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds.) Genre and the New Rhetoric (London: Taylor & Francis), 23–42.
18. NORRIS, S.P. and PHILLIPS, L.M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240.
19. RICHARDSON, L. (1998). Writing. A method of inquiry. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (Thousand Oaks, CA and London: Sage), 345–371.
20. ROBERTS, D.A. (1988). What counts as science education? In P. Fensham (ed.) Development and Dilemmas in Science Education (London: Falmer Press), 27–54.
21. ROTH, W.-M. and ROYCHOUDHURY, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authenthic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 127–152.
22. RYAN, G.W. and BERNARD, H.R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edn) (Thousands Oaks, CA and London: Sage), 769–802.
23. SCHLEPPEGRELL, M.J. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 12(4), 431–459.
24. SMIDT, J. (2002). Double histories in multivocal classrooms: Notes towards an ecological account of writing. Written Communication, 19(3), 414–443.
25. STAKE, R.E. (2000). Case studies. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd edn) (Thousand Oaks, CA and London: Sage), 435–454.
26. STARFIELD, S. (2002). ‘I’m a second-language English speaker’: Negotiating writer identity and authority in sociology one. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 1(2), 121–140.
27. SWALES, J.M. (1990). Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press).
28. TIBERGHIEN, A., VEILLARD, L., LE MARÉCHAL, J.-F., BUTY, C. and MILLAR, R. (2001). An analysis of labwork tasks used in science teaching at upper secondary school and university levels in several European countries. Science Education, 85, 483–508.
29. VAN LEEUWEN, T. (2000). It was just like magic—a multimodal analysis of children’s writing. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 273–305.
30. VEEL, R. (2000). Learning how to mean—scientifically speaking: apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In F. Christie and J.R. Martin (eds.) Genre and Institutions. Social Processes in the Workplace and School (London & New York: Continuum), 161–195.
31. WERLICH, E. (1983). A Text Grammar of English (Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer). WHITE, P.R.R. (1998). Extended reality, proto-nouns and the vernacular. Distinguishing the technological from the scientific. In J.R. Martin and R. Veel (eds.) Reading Science. Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science (London and New York: Routledge), 266–296.
32. WICKMAN, P.-O. and ÖSTMAN, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: a sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601–623.
33. YORE, L.D. (2003). Authentic discourse activities of research scientists: a foundation for the use of literacy and language activities in science instruction. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association meetings in Nordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, 18–23 August.