Scientific literacy and diverse learners: Supporting the acquisition of disciplinary ways of knowing in inclusion classrooms

Teaching Reading: Effective Schools, Accomplished Teachers

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 309-334

  Englert, Carol Sue ^a   Dunsmore, KaiLonnie ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842728695     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612489-22     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Artiles, A.J., Trent, S.C., Hoffman-Kipp, P., & Lopez-Torres, L. (2000). From individual acquisition to cultural-historical practices in multicultural teacher education. Remedial and Special Education, 21(2), 79-89, 120.
2. Barnes, D. (1993). Supporting exploratory talk for learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3. Baynham, M. (1995). Literacy practices: Investigating literacy in social contexts. New York: Longman.
4. Christie, F. (1993). Curriculum genres: Planning for effective teaching. In B.Cope, & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.), The Powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 154-179). Pittsburgh, PA: The Falmer Press.
5. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1993). Introduction: How a genre approach to literacy can transform the way writing is taught. In B.Cope & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.), The Powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 1-21). Pittsburgh, PA: The Falmer Press.
6. Daniels, H. (1996). Introduction: Psychology in a social world. In H.Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 1-27). New York: Routledge.
7. Deshler, D.D., Ellis, E.S., & Lenz, B.K. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods. Denver, CO: Love Pub Co.
8. Englert, C.S., Berry, R.W., & Dunsmore, K.L. (2001). Another Perspective on the Apprentice and the Scaffolding Metaphor. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(2) 152-171.
9. Englert, C.S., & Mariage, T.V. (1996). A sociocultural perspective: Teaching ways-of thinking and ways-of-talking in a literacy community. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11(3), 157-167.
10. Englert, C.S., Mariage, T.V., Garmon, M.A., & Tarrant, K.L. (1998). Accelerating reading progress in Early Literacy Project classrooms: Three exploratory studies. Remedial and Special Education, 19(3), 142-159.
11. Gaskins, I.W., & Guthrie, J.T. (1994). Integrating instruction of science, reading and writing: Goals, teacher development, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1039-1056.
12. Gee, J.P., & Green, J.L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-169.
13. Gindis, B. (1999). Vygotsky's vision reshaping the practice of special education for the 21st Century. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 333-340.
14. Cover, M., & Englert, C.S. (1999, December). Quantitative results of the Learning Environments for Accelerated Progress (LEAP) Curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference. Orlando, Florida.
15. Halliday, M.A.K., & Martin, J.R. (1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh, PA: The Falmer Press.
16. Herrenkohl, L.R., Palincsar, A.S., DeWater, L., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3, 4), 451-493.
17. John-Steiner, V.P., & Meehan, T.M. (2000). Creativity and collaboration in knowledge construetion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kamberelis, G. (1999). Genre development and learning: Children writing stories, science reports, and poems. Research in the Teaching of English, 33, 403-460.
19. Lee, C.D., & Smagorinsky, P (2000). Introduction: Constructing meaning through collaboration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Lemke, J.L. (1982). Talking physics. Physics Education, 17, 263-267.
21. McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as Disability. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(3), 324-348.
22. Minick, N. (1996). The development of Vygotksy's thought: An introduction to Thinking and Speech. In H.Daniels (Eds.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 28-53). New York: Routledge.
23. Morgan, W. (1997). Critical literacy in the classroom. New York: Routledge.
24. Palincsar, A.S., Magnusson, S.J., Collins, K.M., & Cutter, J. (2001). Making science accessible to all: Results of a design experiment in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(1), 15-32.
25. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J.V.Wertsch, P.D.Rio, & A.Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural Studies of the Mind (pp. 139-164). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Roth, W.M. (1998). Designing communities. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27. Roth, W.M., & McGinn, M.K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35-59.
28. Rueda, R., Gallego, M.A., & Moll, L.C. (2000). The least restrictive environment: A place or a context? Remedial and Special Education, 21(2), 70-78.
29. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.
30. Toulmin, S. (1999). Knowledge as shared procedures. In Y.Engestrom, R.Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 53-64). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
32. Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Wertsch, J.V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. In J.V.Wertsch, P.D.Rio, & A.Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural Studies of the Mind (pp. 56-74). New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Wong, B.Y.L., Wong, R., & Blenkisop, J. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning-disabled adolescents' composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 300-322.
36. Wong, B.Y.L., Wong, R., Perry, N., & Sawatsky, K. (1986). The efficacy of a selfquestioning summarization strategy for use by underachievers and learning disabled adolescents in social studies. Learning Disabilities Focus, 2(1), 20-36.