Pinholes may mimic tunneling

Journal of Applied Physics

Volumn 89, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 2786-2790

  Rabson, D A ^a   Jonsson Akerman B J ^b   Romero, A H ^b,c   Escudero, R ^b   Leighton, C ^b   Kim, S ^b   Schuller, Ivan K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR FESTKÖRPERFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18044399874     PISSN: 00218979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1344220     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. J. S. Moodera, L. R. Kinder, T. M. Wong, and R. Meservey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3273 (1995).
2. J. M. Daughton, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 3758 (1997).
3. S. S. P. Parkin et al., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 5828 (1999).
4. S. Tehrani, J. M. Slaughter, E. Chen, M. Durlam, J. Shi, and M. DeHerrera, IEEE Trans. Magn. 35, 2814 (1999).
5. J. Zhang, Data Storage 5, 31 (1998).
6. D. Song, J. Nowak, and M. Covington, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 5197 (2000).
7. E. Y. Chen, R. Whig, J. M. Slaughter, D. Cronk, J. Goggin, G. Steiner, and S. Tehrani, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 6061 (2000).
8. N. García, M. Muñoz, and Y.-W. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2923 (1999).
9. G. Tatara, Y.-W. Zhao, M. Muñoz, and N. García, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2030 (1999).
10. N. García, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1351 (2000).
11. K. T. McCarthy, S. B. Arnason, and A. F. Hebard, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 302 (1999).
12. S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 640 (1999).
13. See, e.g., Tunneling Phenomena in Solids, edited by E. Burstein and S. Lundqvist (Plenum, New York, 1969).
14. B. J. Jonsson-Åkerman, R. Escudero, C. Leighton, S. Kim, I. K. Schuller, and D. A. Rabson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1870 (2000).
15. H. Srikanth and A. K. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Rev. B 46, 14713 (1992) find a change in the sign of curvature of differential conductance, due to local heating, for a series of scanning-tunneling point contacts ranging from microshorts to tunnel junctions. Their well-defined point contacts differ from our accidental pinholes.
16. A. W. Kleinsasser, R. E. Miller, W. H. Mallison, and G. B. Arnold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1738 (1994).
17. W. Wulfhekel, B. Heinrich, M. Klaua, T. Monchesky, F. Zavaliche, R. Urban, and J. Kirschner (unpublished).
18. W. P. Pratt, Jr., S.-F. Lee, J. M. Slaughter, R. Loloee, P. A. Schroeder, and J. Bass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3060 (1991).
19. R. Schad, D. Allen, G. Zangan, I. Zana, D. Yang, M. Tondra, and D. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 607 (2000); D. Allen, R. Schad, C. Zangari, I. Zana, D. Yang, M. Tondra, and D. Wang, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 5188 (2000).
20. R. Schad, D. Allen, G. Zangan, I. Zana, D. Yang, M. Tondra, and D. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 607 (2000); D. Allen, R. Schad, C. Zangari, I. Zana, D. Yang, M. Tondra, and D. Wang, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 5188 (2000).
21. R. Meservey, P. M. Tedrow, and J. S. Brooks, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 1563 (1982).
22. S. Pal and D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. B 49, 10597 (1994).
23. D. P. Landau and S. Pal, Thin Solid Films 272, 184 (1996).
24. D. P. Landau and S. Pal, Langmuir 12, 29 (1996).
25. Having shown that surface diffusion and sticking fail to destroy the exponential regime, we expect this result will also carry over into more detailed molecular-dynamics calculations of the type carried out by I. K. Schuller, MRS Bull. XIII, Nov., 23 (1988).
26. C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978).
27. Yu. V. Sharvin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 48, 984 (1965) [ Sov. Phys. JETP 21, 655 (1965)].
28. Yu. V. Sharvin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 48, 984 (1965) [ Sov. Phys. JETP 21, 655 (1965)].
29. One might also model the effect of polishing scratches in seeding pinholes by imposing a surface potential on the substrate; see D. J. Keavney, E. E. Fullerton, and S. D. Bader, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 795 (1997).
30. D. L. Smith, Thin-Film Deposition: Principles and Practice (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995).
31. J. G. Simmons, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1793 (1963).
32. W. F. Brinkman, R. C. Dynes, and J. M. Rowell, J. Appl. Phys. 41, 1915 (1970).
33. G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515 (1982); G. E. Blonder and M. Tinkham, ibid. 27, 112 (1983) examine the crossover from Andreev reflection to tunneling as the insulating barrier increases in strength. As a practical matter, with a typical band gap (∼10 eV), the Andreev signature should become insignificant for insulating thicknesses greater than a few monolayers. Thus, the presence of Andreev reflection indicates either a pinhole or a "near" pinhole.
34. G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515 (1982); G. E. Blonder and M. Tinkham, ibid. 27, 112 (1983) examine the crossover from Andreev reflection to tunneling as the insulating barrier increases in strength. As a practical matter, with a typical band gap (∼10 eV), the Andreev signature should become insignificant for insulating thicknesses greater than a few monolayers. Thus, the presence of Andreev reflection indicates either a pinhole or a "near" pinhole.