Expanding diversity in dynamic combinatorial libraries: Simultaneous exchange of disulfide and thioester linkages

Chemical Communications

Volumn , Issue 15, 2005, Pages 1959-1961

  Leclaire, Julien ^a   Vial, Laurent ^a   Otto, Sijbren ^a   Sanders, Jeremy K M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISULFIDE; THIOESTER;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; COVALENT BOND; DISULFIDE BOND; DYNAMIC COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; PH; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; REACTION ANALYSIS;

EID: 18044382132     PISSN: 13597345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/b500638d     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. (a) A. Gonzalez-Alvarez, I. Alfonso, F. Lopez-Ortiz, A. Aguirre, S. Garcia-Granda and V. Gotor, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2004, 1117;
2. (b) S. L. Roberts, R. L. E. Furlan, S. Otto and J. K. M. Sanders, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2003, 1, 1625-1633;
3. (c) S. Otto and S. Kubik, J. Am Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 7804;
4. (d) A. L. Kieran, A. D. Bond, A. M. Belenguer and J. K. M. Sanders, Chem. Commun., 2003, 2674;
5. (e) S. Otto, R. L. E. Furlan and J. K. M. Sanders, Science, 2002, 297, 590;
6. (f) Y. Kubota, S. Sakamoto, K. Yamaguchi and M. Fujita, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2002, 99, 4854;
7. (g) O. Storm and U. Lüning, Chem. Eur. J., 2002, 8, 793;
8. (h) E. Stulz, S. M. Scott, A. D. Bond, S. J. Teat and J. K. M. Sanders, Chem. Eur. J., 2003, 9, 6039-6048;
9. (i) M. M. Cai, X. D. Shi, V. Sidorov, D. Fabris, Y. F. Lam and J. T. Davis, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58, 661;
10. (j) G. R. L. Cousins, R. L. E. Furlan, Y.-F. Ng, J. E. Redman and J. K. M. Sanders, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 423;
11. (k) F. Hof, C. Nuckolls and J. Rebek, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 4251;
12. (l) M. Crego-Calama, P. Timmerman and D. N. Reinhoudt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 755;
13. (m) H. Hioki and W. C. Still, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 904.
14. For recent examples, see: (a) A. M. Whitney, S. Ladame and S. Balasubramanian, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 1143;
15. (b) R. Larsson, Z. Pei and O. Ramström, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 3716;
16. (c) H. Li, P. Williams, J. Micklefield, J. M. Gardiner and G. Stephens, Tetrahedron, 2004, 60, 753;
17. (d) R. J. Lins, S. L. Flitsch, N. J. Turner, E. Irving and S. A. Brown, Tetrahedron, 2004, 60, 771;
18. (e) M. Hochgürtel, H. Kroth, D. Piecha, M. W. Hofmann, C. Nicolaou, S. Krause, O. Schaaf, G. Sonnenmoser and A. V. Eliseev, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2002, 99, 3382;
19. (l) C. Karan and B. L. Miller, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 7455.
20. B. Brisig, J. K. M. Sanders and S. Otto, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 1270.
21. (a) A. Bugaut, J.-J. Toulmé and B. Rayner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 3144;
22. (b) N. Giuseppone, J.-L. Schmitt and J.-M. Lehn, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 4902;
23. (c) D. Zhao and J. S. Moore, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 16294;
24. (d) H. J. Cooper, M. A. Case, G. L. McLendon and A. G. Marshall, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 5331;
25. (e) M. A. Case and G. L. McLendon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 122, 8089.
26. S. J. Rowan, S. J. Cantrill, G. R. L. Cousins, J. K. M. Sanders and J. F. Stoddart, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 898-952.
27. M. G. Woll and S. H. Gellman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 11172.
28. V. Goral, M. I. Nelen, A. V. Eliseev and J.-M. Lehn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2001, 98, 1347.
29. For examples of dynamic chemistry where the outcome is linkage-dependent, see: (a) O. Ramström, S. Lohman, T. Bunyapaiboonsri and J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Eur. J., 2004, 10, 1711;
30. (b) K. C. Nicolaou, R. Hughes, S. Y. Cho, N. Winssinger, C. Smethurst, H. Labischinski and R. Endermann, Chem. Eur. J., 2001, 17, 3824;
31. (c) O. Ramström and J.-M. Lehn, ChemBioChem, 2000, 1, 41;
32. (d) K. C. Nicolaou, R. Hughes, S. Y. Cho, N. Winssinger, C. Smethurst, H. Labischinski and R. Endermann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3823;
33. (e) T. D. Clark, K. Kobayashi and M. R. Ghadiri, Chem. Eur. J., 1999, 5, 782.
34. 1 and 3 were obtained by S-acylation of 2 using a procedure adapted from: H. Y. Okuno, K. Uoto, T. T. Tomohiro and M.-T. Youinou, J. Chem, Soc., Dalton Trans., 1990, 3375. 2 was synthesized as reported in ref. 1e.
35. 2 was added at this stage to accelerate the oxidation process as described in: S. Capasso, C. A. Mattia, L. Mazzarella and R. Puliti, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1980, 1297.
36. Although all DCLs of macrocycles inevitably contain linear intermediates that, in principle, can be amplified (for an example, see: R. L. E. Furlan, G. R. L. Cousins and J. K. M. Sanders, Chem. Commun., 2000, 1761), the equilibrium concentration of linears will in general be so low, and their tendency to cyclise so high, that even very large template-induced amplifications will lead to modest yields.
37. Parent monomers 1′ and 2′ are related to building blocks 1 and 2 respectively, as they carry the same individual functionalities.
38. Z. Grote, R. Scopelliti and K. Severin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3821.