Generating scheduling constraints for discrete event dynamic systems

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2004, Pages 568-576

  Chan, Wai Kin ^a   Schruben, Lee W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRAINT THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

DISCRETE EVENT DYNAMIC SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION PROGRAMS; SCHEDULING CONSTRAINTS; SCHEDULING RESOURCES;

SCHEDULING;

EID: 17744372724     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Chan, Wai Kin and L. W. Schruben (2003). Properties of discrete event systems from their mathematical programming representations. Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. Chick, S. E., Sanchez, P. J., Ferrin, D., and Morrice, D. J., 496-502. Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE.
2. Chan, Wai Kin and Lee W. Schruben (2004). Mathematical Programming Representations for Multi-server Tandem Queueing Networks. Technical Report, UC Berkeley, Berkeley.
3. Chen, H. X., C. B. Chu and J. M. Proth (1998). Cyclic scheduling of a hoist with time window constraints. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 14(1): 144-152.
4. Ding, Shengwei and Jingang Yi (2004). An event graph based simulation and analysis of multi-cluster tools. Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. Ingalls, R. G., Rossetti, M. D., Smith, J. S., and Peters, B.A., Piscataway, NJ, USA.
5. Nehme, D. A. and N. G. Pierce (1994). Evaluating the throughput of cluster tools using event-graph simulations. IEEE/SEM 1994 Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. Theme -Manufacturing Excellence: A Global Challenge. ASMC '94 Proceedings, 189-192. New York, NY, USA, IEEE.
6. Pederson, D. E. and C. E. Trout (2002). Demonstrated Benefits of Cluster Tool Simulation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Modeling and Analysis of Semiconductor Manufacturing (MASM 2002), 58-63, Tempe, AZ,.
7. Perkinson, T. L., P. K. McLarty, R. S. Gyurcsik and R. K. Cavin, III (1994). Single-wafer cluster tool performance: an analysis of throughput. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 7(3): 369-373.
8. Phillips, L. W. and P. S. Unger (1976). Mathematical programming solution of a hoist scheduling program. AIIE Transactions 8(2): 219-225.
9. Rostami, S. and B. Hamidzadeh (2002). Optimal scheduling techniques for cluster tools with process-module and transport-module residency constraints. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 15(3): 341-349.
10. Schruben, D. and Lee W. Schruben (2000). Graphical Simulation Modeling using SIGMA. Custom Simulation.
11. Schruben, Lee W. (1983). Simulation Modeling with Event Graphs. Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery.
12. Schruben, L. W. (2000). Mathematical programming models of discrete event system dynamics. Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. Joines, J. A., Barton, R. R., Kang, K., and Fishwick, P. A., 381-385. Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE.
13. Schruben, Lee W. (2003). Conditional Parametric Petri Nets and their Mapping to Simulation Event Graphs. Technical Report, Italy.
14. Shapiro, G. W. and H. L. W. Nuttle (1988). Hoist Scheduling for a Pcb Electroplating Facility. IIE Transactions 20(2): 157-167.
15. Srinivasan, R. S. (1998). Modeling and performance analysis of cluster tools using Petri nets. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 11(3): 394-403.
16. Venkatesh, S., R. Davenport, P. Foxhoven and J. Nulman (1997). A steady-state throughput analysis of cluster tools: dual-blade versus single-blade robots. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 10(4): 418-424.
17. Yen, H.-C. (1999). Integer Linear Programming and the Analysis of Some Petri Net Problems. Theory Computing Systems.
18. Zuberek, W. M. (2001). Timed Petri nets in modeling and analysis of cluster tools. IEEE Transactions on Robotics & Automation 17(5): 562-575.