Teachers' reports of the effects of a whole-school literacy reform model on teacher turnover

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 105, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 395-416

  Bueker, Catherine Simpson ^a  

^a LESLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 17544366964     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/429949     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adams, G. (1996). Using a cox regression model to examine voluntary teacher turnover. Journal of Experimental Education, 64(3), 267-286.
2. Anderson, G. (1998). Toward authentic participation: Deconstructing the discourse of participatory reform in education. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 571-603.
3. Babbie, E. (1998). Survey research methods (2d ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4. Bage, G., Grosvenor, J., & Williams, M. (1999). Curriculum planning: Prediction or response? A case study of teacher planning conducted through partnership action research. Curriculum Journal, 10(1), 253-271.
5. Baker, D., & Smith, T. (1997). Trend 2: Teacher turnover and teacher quality: Refocusing the issue. Teachers College Record, 88(1), 29-36.
6. Bannish, C. (2002). Literacy Collaborative and powerful learning. Accelerated Schools Project Newsletter, 11(2), 3-5.
7. Boe, E., & Bobbitt, S. (1997). Whither didst thou go? Retention, reassignment, migration, and attrition of special and general education teachers from a national perspective. Journal of Special Education, 30(4), 371-390.
8. Bogenschild, E. (1988). A study of teacher attrition: Information on personnel supply and demand. Reston, VA: National Clearinghouse for Professions in Special Education.
9. Brownell, M., Smith, S., McNellis, J., & Miller, N. (1997). Attrition in special education: Why teachers leave the classroom and where they go. Exceptionality, 7(3), 143-155.
10. Caswell, L., Bueker, C., & Miller, C. (2004). Literacy Collaborative Intermediate national report 2004. Cambridge, MA: Lesley University.
11. Center for Reading Recovery and Literacy Collaborative. (2004). A principal's guide to Literacy Collaborative (2d ed.). Cambridge, MA: Lesley University.
12. Clay, M. (1967). The reading behaviour of five-year-old children: A research report. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 2(1), 11-31.
13. Clay, M. (1993a). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. Clay, M. (1993b). Reading Recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. (2004). Results! From schools, districts and states using the America's Choice design. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy.
16. DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.
17. Dunne, F., Nave, B., & Lewis, A. (2000). Critical friends groups: Helping teachers to improve student learning. Phi Delta Kappa Center for Evaluation, Development, and Research, 28. Retrieved August 25, 2004, from http://www.pdkintl.org/edres/resbul28.htm.
18. Elmore, R., Peterson, P., & McCarthey, S. (1996). Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and school organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Fore, L. (1998). Curriculum control: Using discourse and structure to manage educational reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(5), 559-576.
20. Fountas, I., & Pinnell, G. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
21. Fountas, I., & Pinnell, G. (2001). Guided readers and writers: Grades 3-6. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
22. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (1990). Collaboration as a predictor for success in school reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1(1), 69-86.
23. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. Levittown, PA: Taylor & Francis.
24. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3d ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). What's worth fighting for? Working together for your school. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Galley, M. (2004, April 21). Studies find benefits from "America's Choice" design. Education Week, 23, 8-11.
27. Gil-Garcia, A., & Cintron, Z. (2003, June-July). Doing school differently: The leadership factor. Paper presented at a conference on Word Association for Case Method Research and Application, Bordeaux, France.
28. Grissmer, D., & Kirby, S. (1997). Teacher turnover and teacher quality. Teachers College Record, 99(1), 45-57.
29. Hoffman, J. (1998). When bad things happen to good ideas in literacy education: Professional dilemmas, personal decisions, and political traps. Reading Teacher, 52(2), 102-112.
30. Hunt, J., & Carroll, T. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America's children. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
31. Ingersoll, R. (2001). Teacher shortages: Myth or reality? Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
32. Keller, B. (2003, April 30). Question of teacher turnover sparks research interest. Education Week, 22, 8.
33. Knight, S., & Stallings, J. (1995). The implementation of the Accelerated Schools model in an urban elementary school. In R. Allington & S. Walmsley (Eds.), No quick fix (pp. 236-251). New York: Teachers College Press.
34. Kruse, S., Louis, K., & Bryk, A. (1995). Let's build teachers' professional community. Research Highlights, 7(1). Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
35. Lee, V., Dedrick, R., & Smith, J. (1991). The effect of the social organization of schools on teachers' efficacy and satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64(3), 190-208.
36. Literacy Collaborative. (2004). Delivery of effective, research-based practice within a comprehensive literacy project. Columbus: Ohio State University.
37. McCarthey, S., Peterson, P., & Elmore, R. (1996). Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and school organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38. McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Moor, S., & Birkeland, S. (2002). Pursuing a "sense of success": New teachers explain their career decisions. Cambridge, MA: Project of the Next Generation of Teachers, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
40. Norton, M. (1999). Teacher retention: Reducing costly teacher turnover. Contemporary Education, 70(3), 52-56.
41. Olsen, B., & Kirtman, L. (2002). Teacher as mediator of school reform: An examination of teacher practice in 36 California restructuring schools. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 301-324.
42. Olson, J. (2002). Systematic change/teacher tradition: Legends of reform continue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(2), 129-137.
43. Pinnell, G., & Scharer, P. (2001). Extending our reach: Teaching for comprehension in reading, grades K-2. Columbus: Literacy Collaborative at Ohio State University.
44. Richardson, V. (2000). Alexis De Toqueville and the dilemmas of professional development. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
45. Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
46. Rumelhart, D. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Donorio (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 6, pp. 532-573). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Scharer, P., Desai, L., Williams, J., & Pinnell, G. (2003). Literacy Collaborative: A multiyear analysis. Columbus: Ohio State University.
48. Scharer, P., Williams, E., & Pinnell, G. (2001). Literacy Collaborative 2001 research report. Columbus: Ohio State University.
49. Spillane, J. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers' zone of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143-175.
50. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Vygotsky, L. (1985). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Williams, E., Scharer, P., & Pinnell, G. (2000). Literacy Collaborative 2000 research report. Columbus: Ohio State University.