메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 395-407

Helping students understand their learning styles: Effects on study self-efficacy, preference for group work, and group climate

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 17444407488     PISSN: 01443410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443410500041706     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (27)

References (19)
  • 2
    • 0347685324 scopus 로고
    • Reflections of two pragmatists: A critique of Honey and Mumford's learning styles
    • Caple, J., & Martin, P. (1994). Reflections of two pragmatists: A critique of Honey and Mumford's learning styles. Industrial and Commercial Training, 26, 16-20.
    • (1994) Industrial and Commercial Training , vol.26 , pp. 16-20
    • Caple, J.1    Martin, P.2
  • 3
    • 0141439565 scopus 로고
    • Student personality factors: Psychological type and the Myers-Briggs type indicator
    • K. W. Pritchard & R. M. Sawyer (Eds.), Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
    • Carskadon, T. G. (1994). Student personality factors: Psychological type and the Myers-Briggs type indicator. In K. W. Pritchard & R. M. Sawyer (Eds.), Handbook of college teaching: Theory and applications (pp. 69-81). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
    • (1994) Handbook of College Teaching: Theory and Applications , pp. 69-81
    • Carskadon, T.G.1
  • 5
    • 0012763762 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Whose group is it, anyway? Equity of student discourse in problem-based learning (PBL)
    • D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
    • Duek, J. E. (2000). Whose group is it, anyway? Equity of student discourse in problem-based learning (PBL). In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 75-107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • (2000) Problem-based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions , pp. 75-107
    • Duek, J.E.1
  • 7
    • 0040027187 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Individual learning style and the learning style inventory
    • Heffler, B. (2001). Individual learning style and the learning style inventory. Educational Studies, 27, 307-316.
    • (2001) Educational Studies , vol.27 , pp. 307-316
    • Heffler, B.1
  • 9
    • 84986014923 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Group composition, performance and educational attainment
    • Houldsworth, C., & Mathews, B. P. (2000). Group composition, performance and educational attainment. Education and Training, 42, 40-53.
    • (2000) Education and Training , vol.42 , pp. 40-53
    • Houldsworth, C.1    Mathews, B.P.2
  • 10
    • 0034339755 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assigning students in group work projects. Can we do better than random?
    • Huxham, M., & Land, R. (2000). Assigning students in group work projects. Can we do better than random? Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 17-22.
    • (2000) Innovations in Education and Training International , vol.37 , pp. 17-22
    • Huxham, M.1    Land, R.2
  • 12
    • 0029905584 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of paediatric resident and faculty learning styles: Implications for medical education
    • Kosower, E., & Berman, N. (1996). Comparison of paediatric resident and faculty learning styles: Implications for medical education. American Journal of Medical Science, 312, 214-218.
    • (1996) American Journal of Medical Science , vol.312 , pp. 214-218
    • Kosower, E.1    Berman, N.2
  • 13
    • 0442319936 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The distribution of learning styles and types for hard and soft business majors
    • Loo, R. (2002). The distribution of learning styles and types for hard and soft business majors. Educational Psychology, 22, 349-360.
    • (2002) Educational Psychology , vol.22 , pp. 349-360
    • Loo, R.1
  • 15
    • 84979381976 scopus 로고
    • Group dynamics: Understanding group success and failure in collaborative learning
    • Miller, J. E., Trimbur, J., & Wilkes, J. M. (1994). Group dynamics: Understanding group success and failure in collaborative learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 59, 33-44.
    • (1994) New Directions for Teaching and Learning , vol.59 , pp. 33-44
    • Miller, J.E.1    Trimbur, J.2    Wilkes, J.M.3
  • 17
    • 0001398345 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interdependence and preference for group work: Main and congruence effects on the satisfaction and performance of group members
    • Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Stark, E. M. (2000). Interdependence and preference for group work: Main and congruence effects on the satisfaction and performance of group members. Journal of Management, 26, 259-279.
    • (2000) Journal of Management , vol.26 , pp. 259-279
    • Shaw, J.D.1    Duffy, M.K.2    Stark, E.M.3
  • 18
    • 0035602119 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A study strategies self-efficacy instrument for use with community college students
    • Silver, B. B., Smith, E. V., & Greene, B. A. (2001). A study strategies self-efficacy instrument for use with community college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 849-865.
    • (2001) Educational and Psychological Measurement , vol.61 , pp. 849-865
    • Silver, B.B.1    Smith, E.V.2    Greene, B.A.3
  • 19
    • 85068302847 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Felder and Silverman's index of learning styles and Honey and Mumford's learning styles questionnaire: How do they compare and do they predict academic performance?
    • Van Zwanenberg, N., Wilkinson, L. J., & Anderson, A. (2000). Felder and Silverman's index of learning styles and Honey and Mumford's learning styles questionnaire: How do they compare and do they predict academic performance? Educational Psychology, 20, 365-380.
    • (2000) Educational Psychology , vol.20 , pp. 365-380
    • Van Zwanenberg, N.1    Wilkinson, L.J.2    Anderson, A.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.