Felder and silverman's index of learning styles and honey and mumford's learning styles questionnaire: How do they compare and do they predict academic performance?

Educational Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 365-380

  Van Zwanenberg, Nigel ^a   Wilkinson, L J ^a   Anderson, A ^b  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068302847     PISSN: 01443410     EISSN: 14695820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713663743     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. CORNWELL, J.M., and DUNLAP, W.P., 1994. On the questionable soundness of factoring ipsative data: a response to Saville & Willson (1991). Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67: 89–100.
2. FELDER, R.M., 1996. Matters of style. SEE Prism, 6: 18–23.
3. FELDER, R.M., and SILVERMN, L.K., 1988. Learning styles and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78: 674–681.
4. HARVEY, O.J., HUNT, D.E., and SCHRODER, H.M., 1961. Conceptual Systems and Personality Organization, New York: Wiley.
5. HAYES, J., and LLINSON, C.W., 1993. Matching learning styles and instructional strategy: an application of the person-environment interaction paradigm. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76: 63–79.
6. HAYES, J., and ALLINSON, C.W., 1996. The Implications of learning styles for training and development: a discussion of the matching hypothesis. British Journal of Management, 7: 63–73.
7. HOLLAND, J.L., 1973. Making Vocational Choices: a theory of careers, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. HONEY, P., and MUMFORD. 1992. The Manual of Learning Styles, 3rd Edn, Maidenhead: Honey.
9. KLINE, P., 1993. A Handbook of Test Construction, London: Routledge.
10. KOLB, D., 1984. Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11. LUMSDINE, M., and LUMSDINE, E., 1993. Thinking preferences of engineering students: implications for curriculum restructuring. Journal of Engineering Education, 84: 193–204.
12. MYERS, IB, and MYERS, P.B., 1980. Gifts Differing, Palo alto, C: Consulting Psychologists Press.
13. RIDING, R.J., 1991. Cognitive Styles Analysis--CS administration, Birmingham, UK: Learning & Training Technology.
14. RIDING, R.J., and RAYNER, S.G., 1998. Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies, London: David Fulton.
15. SADLER-SMITH, E., Three or four learning styles? reply to Swailes and Senior. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the European Learning Styles Information Network. Preston, UK. pp. 369–374. University of Central Lancashire.
16. SOLOMON, B., and FELDER, R.M., 1996. Index of Learning Styles, North Carolina State University. http://www2.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSpage.html
17. STERNBERG, R.J., and GRIGORENKO, E.L., 1997. re cognitive styles still in style?. American Psychologist, 52: 700–712.
18. SWILES, S., and SENIOR, B., 1999. The dimensionality of Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles Questionnaire. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7: 1–11.
19. VAN ZWANENBERG, N., and WILKINSON, L.J., 1996. “ Why biodata works: explanations from theory and research ”. In Compendium of Papers Presented to the First Biennial Biodata Conference Edited by: STENNETT, R.B., PARISI, G., and STOKES, G.S., 32–37. Athens, US, Georgia
20. WILKINSON, L.J., 1997. Generalizable biodata? n application to the vocational interests of managers. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 70: 49–60.
21. WILKINSON, L.J., ANDERSON, A., VAN ZWANENBERG, N., ERDOS, G., and HARVEY, J., Study of the Characteristics of Prospective Engineers at Different Stages of Development. Conference paper presented to Professional Standards and Quality in Engineering Education. March, Sheffield, UK.
22. WITKIN, H., 1949. The nature and importance of individual differences in perception. Journal of Personality, 18: 145–170.