Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 123-130

  Manhart, Juergen ^a   Chen, Hong Yan ^a   Mehl, Albert ^a   Weber, Karin ^a   Hickel, Reinhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cervical lesions; Class V cavity; Composite; Dentin adhesives; Marginal quality; Microleakage

Indexed keywords

AELITEFLO; AQUA PREP; AQUA-PREP; ARABESK; BARIUM DERIVATIVE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; MARATHON; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ONE STEP DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM; ONE-STEP DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM; OPTIBOND; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND; PRODIGY; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICON DIOXIDE; SINGLE BOND; SOLOBOND M; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; TENURE QUIK; TETRIC CERAM; WETTING AGENT; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

BARIUM COMPOUNDS; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH CERVIX; WETTING AGENTS; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0035256712     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00066-X     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Krejci I, Lutz F. Marginal adaptation of class V restorations using different restorative techniques. Journal of Dentistry 1991;19:24-32.
2. Rees JS. The role of cuspal flexure in the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. European Journal of Oral Sciences 1998;106:1028-32.
3. Schüpbach P, Guggenheim B, Lutz F. Human root caries. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine 1989;18:146-56.
4. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. Journal of Dentistry 1994;22:195-207.
5. Hickel R. Die zervikale Füllung. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 1994;49:13-19.
6. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stresses in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1984;52:374-80.
7. McCoy G. The etiology of gingival erosion. Journal of Oral Implantology 1982;10:361-2.
8. Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Chang KH. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth - a finite element investigation. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1991;66:451-9.
9. Grippo JO. Abfractions. A new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 1991;3:14-19.
10. Lang H, Schwan R, Nolden R. Die Verformung gefüllter Zähne. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 1994;49:812-5.
11. Tyas MJ. The class V lesion - aetiology and restoration. Australian Dental Journal 1995;40:167-70.
12. Manhart J, Weber K, Mehl A, Hickel R. Marginal quality of dentin adhesives/composites in mixed class V cavities. Journal of Dental Research 1999;78:444 (Abstr. No. 2705).
13. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in class V carious lesions. American Journal of Dentistry 1997;10:18-20.
14. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. Effect of desiccation on microleakage of five class 5 restorative materials. Operative Dentistry 1996;21:90-95.
15. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence International 1996;27:775-84.
16. Hickel R, Manhart J. Glass-ionomers and compomers in pediatric dentistry. Advances in glass-ionomer cements, Berlin: Quintessence Publishing, 1999. p. 201-26.
17. Manhart J, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Bond strength of a compomer to dentin under various surface conditions. Clinical Oral Investigations 1999;3:175-80.
18. Manhart J, Hickel R. Esthetic compomer restorations in posterior teeth using a new all-in-one adhesive: case presentation. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 1999;11:250-8.
19. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. Journal of Dental Research 1997;76:883-94.
20. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, Tyas M, Anusavice K. New direct restorative materials. International Dental Journal 1998;48:3-16.
21. Manhart J, Hollwich B, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Randqualität von Ormocer- und Kompositfüllungen in Klasse-II-Kavitäten nach künstlicher Alterung. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 1999;54:89-95.
22. Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine. Journal of Dentistry 1999;27:119-28.
23. Sparrius O, Grossman ES. Marginal leakage of composite resin restorations in combination with dentinal and enamel bonding agents. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1989;61:678-84.
24. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. Journal of Dentistry 1997;25:355-72.
25. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. Journal of Dental Research 1992;71:1530-40.
26. Marshall GW, Balooch M, Kinney JH, Marshall SJ. Atomic force microscopy of conditioning agents on dentin. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1995;29:1381-7.
27. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Horner JA. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence International 1993;24:618-31.
28. Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G, Lopes AL. Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 1995;29:1111-20.
29. Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Malek MA. Effect of a re-wetting agent on the performance of acetone-based dentin adhesives. American Journal of Dentistry 1998;11:207-13.
30. Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. American Journal of Dentistry 1992;5:127-9.
31. Gwinnett AJ. Dentin bond strength after air drying and rewetting. American Journal of Dentistry 1994;7:144-8.
32. Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Suh BI, Andreasen JO, Kreiborg S. Adhesive bonding of fractured anterior teeth: effect of wet technique and rewetting agent. American Journal of Dentistry 1998;11:251-3.
33. Carvalho RM, Yoshiyama M, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. In vitro study on the dimensional changes of human dentine after demineralization. Archives of Oral Biology 1996;41:369-77.
34. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without softstart-polymerization. Journal of Dentistry 1997;25:321-30.
35. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. European Journal of Oral Sciences 1998;106:1033-42.
36. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller K-A, Mortazavi F. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Operative Dentistry 1997;22:21-29.
37. Swift EJ, Triolo PT, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. American Journal of Dentistry 1996;9:100-4.
38. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years. Journal of Dentistry 1995;23:329-38.
39. Roulet JF. Marginal integrity: clinical significance. Journal of Dentistry 1994;22(Suppl 1):9-12.
40. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Operative Dentistry 1997;22:173-85.
41. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Transactions Academy of Dental Materials 1998;12:21-71.
42. Schuckar M, Geurtsen W. Proximo-cervical adaptation of class II -composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study. Journal of Oral Rehabiitation 1997;24:766-75.
43. Tyas MJ. Dental amalgam - what are the alternatives?. International Dental Journal 1994;44:303-8.
44. Krejci I, Guntert A, Lutz F. Scanning electron microscopic and clinical examination of composite resin inlays/onlays up to 12 months in situ. Quintessence International 1994;25:403-9.
45. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Hiller K-A. Kunststoffausquellung bei Kavitätenrändern im Dentin. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 1995;50:847-50.
46. Kunzelmann KH, Krause F, Hickel R. Dentinhaftung von Kompositfüllungen und Keramikinlays in Klasse-II-Kavitäten. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 1993;48:724-7.
47. Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures. American Journal of Dentistry 1999;12:123-30.
48. Lutz F, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence International 1986;17:777-784
49. Crawford PJM, Whittaker DK, Owen GM. The influence of enamel prism orientation on leakage of resin-bonded restorations. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1987;14:283-9.
50. Hugo B, Lussi A, Hotz P. Die Präparation der Schmelzrandschrägung bei approximalen Kavitäten. Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin 1992;102:1181-8.
51. Manhart J, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Haftkraft und Randverhalten moderner Einflaschen-Haftvermittlersysteme und Komposite zum Dentin. Deutsche Zahnärztliche Zeitschrift 2000;55:128-33.