Clinical evaluation of Prime & Bond 2.1 for treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 13-16

  Swift Jr , Edward J ^a,b   May Jr , Kenneth N ^b   Mitchell, Shannon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME AND BOND 2.1;

ADULT; AIR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLD; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREMOLAR TOOTH; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIME; TOOTH CERVIX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACETONE; ADULT; AIR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; COLD; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CUSPID; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCISOR; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH CERVIX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0035262577     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Murray L, Roberts AJ. The prevalence of self-reported hypersensitive teeth. Archs Oral Biol 1994;39 (Suppl): 129S-135S.
2. Addy M, Pearce N. Aetiological, predisposing and environmental factors in dentine hypersensitivity. Archs Oral Biol 1994;34 (Suppl):33S-38S.
3. Wichgers TG, Emert RL. Dentin hypersensitivity. Gen Dent 1996;44: 225-230.
4. Chabanski MB, Gillam DG. Aetiology, prevalence and clinical features of cervical dentine sensitivity. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24:15-19.
5. Christensen GJ. Desensitization of cervical tooth structure. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:765-766.
6. Gangarosa LP. Current strategies for dentist-applied treatment in the management of hypersensitive dentine. Archs Oral Biol 1994;34 (Suppl):101S-106S.
7. Swift EJ, Hammel SA, Perdigão J, et al. Prevention of root surface caries using a dental adhesive. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:571-576.
8. Griffiths BM, Watson TF, Sherriff M. The influence of dentine bonding systems and their handling characteristics on the morphology and micropermeability of the dentine adhesive interface. J Dent 1999; 27:63-67.
9. American Dental Association. Council on Scientific Affairs. Program guidelines: Products for the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity, May 1998 (available at www.ada.org).
10. American Dental Association. Ad Hoc Advisory Committee on Dentinal Hypersensitivity, Council on Dental Therapeutics. Recommendations for evaluating agents for the reduction of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:709-710.
11. Holland GR, Narhi MN, Addy A, et al. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentin hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:308-311.
12. Gillam DG, Aris A, Bulman JS, et al. Evaluation of dentine hypersensi-tivity in subjects recruited for clinical trials. J Dent Res 1999;78:268 (Abstr 1297).
13. Huskisson EC. Visual analogue pain rating scales. In: McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987; 235-239.
14. Brännström M. Sensitivity of dentin. Oral Surg 1966; 21:517-526.
15. Brännström M, Linden LA, Johnson G. Movement of dentinal and pulpal fluid caused by clinical procedures. J Dent Res 1968;47:679-682.
16. Brännström M. The transmission and control of dentinal pain. In: Grossman LI. Mechanism and control of pain. New York: Masson, 1979; 15-35.
17. Brännström M. Etiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88 (Suppl 1):7-13.
18. Pashley DH. Dentin permeability and dentin sensitivity. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88 (Suppl 1):31-37.
19. Brännström M, Johnson G, Nordenvall KJ. Transmission and control of dentinal pain: Resin impregnation for the desensitization of dentin. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99:612-618.
20. Ide M, Morel AD, Wilson RF, et al. The role of a dentine-bonding agent in reducing cervical dentine sensitivity. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:286-290.
21. Ferrari M, Cagìdiaco MC, Kugel G, et al. Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots. Am J Dent 1999;12:243-249.
22. Dondi dall'Orologio G, Lorenzi R, Anselmi M, et al. Dentin desensitizing effects of Gluma Alternate, Health-Dent Desensitizer and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent 1999;12:103-106.
23. Gillam DG, Coventry JF, Manning RH, et al. Comparison of two desensitizing agents for the treatment of cervical dentine sensitivity. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997;13:36-39.
24. Morris MF, Davis RD, Richardson BW. Clinical efficacy of two dentin desensitizing agents. Am J Dent 1999;12:72-76.
25. Närhi M, Kontturi-Närhi V, Hirvonen T, et al. Neurophysiological mechanisms of dentin hypersensitivity. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88 (Suppl 1): 15-22.
26. Ferrari M, Goracci G, García-Godoy F. Bonding mechanism of three "one-bottle" systems to conditioned and unconditioned enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997;10:224-230.
27. Prati C, Chersons S, Mongiorgi R, et al. Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 1998;23:185-194.
28. Davidson DF, Suzuki M. The Gluma bonding system: A clinical evaluation of its various components for the treatment of hypersensitive root dentin. J Can Dent Assoc 1997;63:38-41.