Trust in organizational acceptance of information technology: A conceptual model and preliminary evidence

Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 1395-1400

  Misiolek, Nora I ^a   Zakaria, Norhayati ^a   Zhang, Ping ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS (IS); PSYCHOMETRIC ANALYSIS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPETITION; DECISION MAKING; INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 1642441729     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694.
2. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 557-583.
3. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361-391.
4. Baba, M.L. (1999). Dangerous liaisons: Trust, distrust, and information technology in the American work organizations. Human Organization, 58(3), 331-346.
5. Barney, J.B., & Hansen, M.H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 175-190.
6. Ciancutti, A., & Steding, T.L. (2001). Built on trust. Gaining competitive advantage in any organization. Chicago: Contemporary Books.
7. Cummings, L.L., & Bromiley, P. (1996). The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI). In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 302-330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
8. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
9. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of information technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
10. Dodgson, M. (1993). Learning, trust, and technological collaboration. Human Relations, 46(1), 77-95.
11. Dyer, J.H. (1997). Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 535-556.
12. Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The social psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
13. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14. Kramer, R.M., & Tyler, T.R. (Eds.) (1996). Trust in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 76-104.
16. Lewicki, R.J., & Bunker, B.B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 114-139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
17. Lewicki, R.J., McAllister, D.J., & Bies, R. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438-458.
18. Lindauer, T.K. (1995). The trouble with computers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19. Lucas, H.C., Jr. (1999). Information technology and the productivity paradox. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Lucas, H.C., Jr., & Spitler, V.K. (1999). Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sciences, 30(2), 291-311.
21. Luftman, J., & Brier, T. (1999). Achieving and sustaining business-IT alignment. California Management Review, 42(1), 109-122.
22. Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relationships (pp. 94-108). New York: Basil Blackwell.
23. Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W.W. (2001). Extending the technology acceptance model: The influence of perceived user resources. The DATA BASE for advances in information systems, 32(3), 86-112.
24. McAllister, D.J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
25. Nooteboom, B., Berger, H., & Noorderhaven, N.G. (1997). Effects of trust and governance on relational risk. The Academy of Management Review, 40(8), 308-338.
26. Powell, W.W. (1996). Trust-based forms of governance. In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 61-67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Ring, P.S. (1996). Fragile and resilient trust and their roles in economic exchange. Business & Society, 35(2), 148-175.
29. Ring, P.S., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1994). Development processes in cooperative interorganizational relationships. The Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90-118.
30. Rogers, E. (1986). Communication technology. The new media in society. New York: The Free Press.
31. rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
32. Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
33. Sitkin, S.B., & Stickel, D. (1996). The road to hell. The dynamics of distrust in an era of quality. In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 196-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
34. Tyler, T.R., & Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in organizational authorities. The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In R.M. Kramer & T.R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 331-350). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
36. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M.G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24, 115-139.