Fracture Resistance of Compomer and Composite Restoratives

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 29-34

  Yap, A U J ^a,d   Chung, S M ^a   Chow, W S ^b   Tsai, K T ^c   Lim, C T ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c INSTRON   (United Kingdom)

^d NONE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOGLASS; COMPOMER; DYRACT; ESTHET X; ESTHET-X; F2000 CEMENT; FILTEK Z250; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; TETRIC CERAM; WATER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; DEVICE; HARDNESS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; REPARATIVE DENTISTRY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TIME; WEIGHT BEARING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; WATER; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 1642438150     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abu-Bakr N, Han L, Okamoto A & Iwaku M (2000) Changes in the mechanical properties and surface texture of compomer immersed in various media Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 84(4) 444-452.
2. American Society for Testing and Materials (1997) Standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials E399-90.
3. Burke FJT, Cheung SW, Mjör IA & Wilson NHF (1999) Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainees in the United Kingdom Quintessence International 30(4) 234-242.
4. Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M & De Stefano Dorigo E (2000) Cervical compomer restorations: The role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation Operative Dentistry 25(5) 382-387.
5. Donly KJ & Grandgenett C (1998) Dentin demineralization inhibition at restoration margins of Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass American Journal of Dentistry 11(5) 245-248.
6. Draughn RA (1981) Effects of temperature on mechanical properties of composite dental restorative materials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 15(4) 489-495.
7. Eliades G, Kakaboura A & Palaghias G (1998) Acid-base reaction and fluoride release profiles in visible light-cured polyacid-modified composite restoratives (compomers) Dental Materials 14(1) 57-63.
8. Ferracane JL, Antonio RC & Matsumoto H (1987) Variables affecting the fracture toughness of dental composites Journal of Dental Research 66(6) 1140-1145.
9. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH & Hickel R (2001) Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions - 5-year results American Journal of Dentistry 14(3) 153-156.
10. Forsten L (1998) Fluoride release and uptake by glass ionomers and related materials and its clinical effect Biomaterials 19(6) 503-508.
11. Fujishima A & Ferracane JL (1996) Comparison of four modes of fracture toughness testing for dental composites Dental Materials 12(1) 38-43.
12. Johnson WW, Dhuru VB & Brantley WA (1993) Composite micro-filler content and its effect on fracture toughness and diametral tensile strength Dental Materials 9(2) 95-98.
13. Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Seghi R, Berlin JS & Clelland N (2002) Fracture toughness of packable and conventional composite materials Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 88(3) 307-313.
14. Kovarik RE & Fairhurst CW (1993) Effect of Griffith precracks on measurement of composite fracture toughness Dental Materials 9(4) 222-228.
15. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM & Blake SM (2001) Localized wear of compomer restorative materials American Journal of Dentistry 14(4) 238-240.
16. Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT & Wei SH (2000) Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations - one-year results Quintessence International 31(9) 630-636.
17. Mair LJ & Vowles R (1989) The effect of thermal cycling on the fracture toughness of seven composite restorative materials Dental Materials 5(1) 23-26.
18. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY & Hickel R (2000) Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research (Applied Biomaterials) 53(4) 353-361.
19. McLean JW, Nicholson JW & Wilson AD (1994) Proposed nomenclature for glass ionomer dental cements and related materials Quintessence International 25(9) 587-589.
20. Meyer JN, Cattani-Lorente MA & Dupuis V (1998) Compomers: Between glass ionomer cements and composite Biomaterials 19(6) 529-539.
21. Scherrer SS, Botsis J, Studer M, Pini M, Wiskott HW & Belser UC (2000) Fracture toughness of aged dental composites in combined Mode I and Mode II Loading Journal of Biomedical Materials Research (Applied Biomaterials) 53(4) 362-370.
22. Truong VT & Tyas MJ (1988) Prediction of in vivo wear in posterior composite resins: A fracture mechanics approach Dental Materials 4(6) 318-327.
23. van Dijken JW (1999) Longevity of new hybrid materials in Class III cavities European Journal of Oral Science 107(3) 215-219.
24. Xu HHK, Martin TA, Antonucci JM & Eichmiller FC (1999) Ceramic whisker reinforcement of dental resin composites Journal of Dental Research 78(2) 706-712.
25. Yap AUJ, Chandra SP, Chung SM & Lim CT (2002) Changes in flexural properties of composite restoratives after aging in water Operative Dentistry 27(5) 468-474.
26. Yap AUJ, Khor E & Foo SH (1999) Fluoride release and antibacterial properties of new generation tooth-colored restoratives Operative Dentistry 24(5) 297-305.
27. Yap AUJ, Tan DTT, Goh BKC, Kuah HG & Goh M (2000) Effect of food-simulating liquids on the flexural strength of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives Operative Dentistry 25(3) 202-208.
28. York AK & Arthur JS (1993) Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States Navy Dental Corps Operative Dentistry 18(5) 203-208.