The impact of collective and competitive veto points on public expenditures in the global age

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 259-285

  Crepaz, Markus M L ^a   Moser, Ann W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b FedEx   (United States)

Author keywords

Globalization; Political institutions; Public expenditures; Veto points; Welfare state

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642336777     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414003262067     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Achen, C. H. (2000, July). Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, University of California-Los Angeles.
2. Alesina, A., & Drazen, A. (1991). Why are stabilizations delayed? American Economic Review, 81, 1170-1188.
3. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
4. Basinger, S., & Hallerberg, M. (2001, September). Competing for capital: The effects of veto players, partisanship, and competing countries ' domestic politics in tax reform. Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
5. Bawn, K. (1999). Money and majorities in the Federal Republic of Germany: Evidence for a veto players model of government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 707-736.
6. Beck, N., & Katz, J. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time series cross section data. American Political Science Review, 89, 637-647.
7. Berger, S., & Dore, R. (Eds.). (1996). National diversity and global capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8. Birchfield, V., & Crepaz, M. M. L. (1998). The impact of constitutional structures and collective and competitive veto points on income inequality in industrialized democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 34, 175-200.
9. Boyer, R., & Drache, D. (Eds.). (1996). States against markets: The limits of globalization. London: Routledge.
10. Cable, V. (1995). The diminished nation state: A study in the loss of economic power. Deadalus, 124, 23-54.
11. Cameron, D. (1978). The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 72, 1243-1261.
12. Castles, F. G. (1982). The impact of parties. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
13. Crepaz, M. M. L. (2001). Veto players, globalization, and the redistributive capacity of the state: A panel study of 15 OECD countries. The Journal of Public Policy, 21, 1-22.
14. Crepaz, M. M. L. (2002a). Global, constitutional, and partisan determinants of redistribution in fifteen OECD countries. Comparative Politics, 34, 169-188.
15. Crepaz, M. M. L. (2002b). The impact of veto players, parties, and globalization on the redistributive capacity of the state: A panel study of 15 OECD countries. Comparative Politics, 34, 169-188.
16. Crepaz, M. M. L., & Birchfield, V. (2000). Global economics, local politics: Lijphart's theory of consensus democracy and the politics of inclusion. In M. M. L. Crepaz, T. A. Koelble, & D. Wilsford (Eds.), Democracy and institutions. The life work of Arend Lijphart (pp. 197-224). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17. Cusack, T. R. (1996). General government spending and revenues data set. Retrieved May 11, 2002, from http://www.wz-berlin.de/~tom/data.en.htm
18. De Winter, L., Timmermans, A., & Dumont, P. (2000). Belgium: On government agreements, evangelists, followers, and heretics. In W. C. Müller & S. Kaare (Eds.), Coalition governments in Western Europe (pp. 300-355). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
19. Duverger, M. (1964). Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state. London: Methuen.
20. Esping-Andersen, G. (2000). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21. Garrett, G. (1998). Partisan politics in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
22. Garrett, G., & Mitchell, D. (2001). Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research, 39, 145-177.
23. Goodin, R. E. (1996). Institutionalizing the public interest: The defense of deadlock and beyond. American Political Science Review, 90, 331-343.
24. Gourevitch, P. (1996). The macropolitics of microinstitutional differences in the analysis of comparative capitalism. In S. Berger & R. Dore (Eds.), National diversity and global capitalism (pp. 239-262). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25. Habermas, J. (1976). Legitimation crisis. London: Heineman.
26. Hall, P. (2001). Organized market economies and unemployment in Europe. Is it finally time to accept liberal orthodoxy? In N. Bermeo (Ed.), Unemployment in the new Europe (pp. 52-86). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hallerberg, M., & Basinger, S. (1998). Internationalization and changes in tax policy in OECD countries: The importance of domestic veto players. Comparative Political Studies, 31, 321-352.
28. Henisz, W. J. (2002). The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2), 355-389.
29. Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1996). Globalization in question: The international economy and the possibilities of governance. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
30. Huber, E., Ragin, C., & Stephens, J. (1993). Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology. 99, 711-749.
31. Huber, E., Ragin, C., & Stephens, J. D. (1997). Comparative welfare states data set. Chicago: Northwestern University & University of North Carolina.
32. Iversen, T., & Cusack, T. R (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization. World Politics, 52, 313-349.
33. Jankowski, R. (1993). Responsible, irresponsible, and Westminster parties: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. British Journal of Political Science, 23, 107-129.
34. Kalecki, M. (1943). Political aspects of full employment. Political Quarterly, 14, 322-331.
35. Katzenstein, P. (1985). Small states in world markets, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36. Kirschen, E. S. (1964). Economic policy in our time. Amsterdam: North Holland.
37. Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
38. Krugman, P. R. (1995). Growing world trade: Causes and consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 327-362.
39. Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979). Effective number of parties: A measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12, 3-27.
40. Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42. Lindblom, C. (1977). Politics and markets: The world's political economic systems. New York: Basic Books.
43. Milesi-Ferretti, G., Perotti, M., & Rostagno, M. (1999). Electoral systems and the composition of public spending. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University, New York.
44. Nousiainen, J. (2000). Finland: The consolidation of parliamentary governance. In W. C. Müller & K. Strom (Eds.), Coalition governments in Western Europe (pp. 264-299). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
45. Offe, C. (1984). Contradictions of the welfare state. London: Hutchinson.
46. Ohmae, K. (1995). The end of the nation state. New York: Free Press.
47. Olson, M. (1986). A theory of the incentives facing political organizations: Neocorporatism and the hegemonic state. International Political Science Review, 7, 165-189.
48. Prais, S. J., & Winsten, C. B. (1954). Trend estimators and serial correlation (Discussion Paper No. 383). Chicago: Cowles Commission.
49. Prakash, A. (2001). Grappling with globalization: Challenges for economic governance. The World Economy, 24, 543-566.
50. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51. Quinn, D. P. (1997). The correlates of international financial liberation. American Political Science Review, 91, 531-551.
52. Rhodes, M. (2001). Globalization, welfare states, and employment: Is there a third way? In N. Bermeo (Ed.), Unemployment in the new Europe (pp. 87-120). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
53. Rodrik, D. (1996). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of Political Economy, 6, 997-1032.
54. Rodrik, D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
55. Rothstein, B. (1998). Just institutions matter: The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
56. Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. (1989a). Government spending and budget deficits in the industrial countries. Economic Policy, 8, 99-132.
57. Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. (1989b). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial democracies. European Economic Review, 33, 903-934.
58. Ruggie, J. G. (1983). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. In S. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 195-232). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
59. Sartori, G. (1968). Political development and political engineering. In J. D. Montogomery & A. O. Hirschmann (Eds.), Public policy (pp. 261-198). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60. Strange, S. (1995). The limits of politics. Government and Opposition, 30, 291-311.
61. Streeck. W. (1996). Lean production in the German automobile industry: A test case for convergence theory. In S. Berger & R. Dore (Eds.), National diversity and global capitalism (pp. 138-170). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
62. Strom, K. (1997). Democracy, accountability and coalition bargaining. European Journal of Political Research, 31, 47-62.
63. Swank, D. (1998). Funding the welfare state: Globalization and the taxation of business in advanced market economies. Political Studies, 46, 671-692.
64. Swank, D. (2001). Mobile capital, democratic institutions, and the public economy in advanced industrial societies. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 3, 133-162.
65. Swank, D. (2002). Global capital, political institutions, and policy change in developed welfare states. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Swenson, P. (1989). Fair shares, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
67. Tabellini, G. (2000, February). Constitutional determinants of government spending. Paper presented at the Munich Lectures in Economics, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
68. Timmermans, A., & Andeweg, R. (2000). The Netherlands: Still the politics of accommodation? In W. C. Müller & K. Strom (Eds.), Coalition governments in Western Europe (pp. 356-398). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
69. Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25, 289-325.
70. Tsebelis, G. (1999). Veto players and law production in parliamentary democracies: An empirical analysis. American Political Science Review, 93, 591-608.
71. Tsebelis, G., & Chang, E. C. C. (2001, September). Veto players and the structure of budgets in advanced industrialized countries. Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
72. Visser, J., & Hemerijck, A. (1997). "A Dutch miracle": Job growth, welfare reform and corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
73. Weingast, B. (1979). A rational choice perspective on congressional norms. American Journal of Political Science, 23, 245-263.
74. Wood, S. (1997). Capitalist constitutions: Supply-side reform in Britain and Germany, 1960 to 1990. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Boston.