Reaching for virtual objects: Binocular disparity retinal motion and the control of prehension

Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia

Volumn 66, Issue 5 SUPPL., 2003, Pages 53-61

  Bradshaw, Mark F ^a   Hibbard, Paul B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Binocular disparity; Distance perception; Prehension; Size perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642377604     PISSN: 00042749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0004-27492003000600007     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Julesz B. Binocular depth perception of computer generated patterns. Bell Systems. Technical. Journal 1960;39:1125-62.
2. Wallach H, O'Connell DN. The kinetic depth effect. J Exp Psychol 1953;45: 205-17.
3. Bradshaw MF, Parton AD, Glennerster A. The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information, Vision Res 2000;40:3725-34.
4. Johnston EB. Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Res 1991;31:1351-60.
5. Collett TS, Schwarz U, Sobell E. The Interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic depth constancy. Perception 1991;20:733-54.
6. Todd JT, Tittle JS, Norman JF. Distortions of 3-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo. Perception 1995;24:75-86.
7. Rogers BJ, Bradshaw MF, Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature 1993;361:253-25.
8. Durgin FH, Proffitt DR, Olson JT, Reinke KS. Comparing depth from binocular disparity to depth from motion. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1995;21:679-99.
9. Rogers BJ, Bradshaw MF. Disparity scaling and the perception of fronto-parallel surfaces. Perception 1995a;24:155-80.
10. Bradshaw MF, Glennerster A, Rogers BJ. The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues. Vision Res 1996;36:1255-65.
11. Glennerster A, Rogers BJ, Bradshaw MF. Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task. Vision Res 1996;36:3441-56.
12. Cumming BG, Johnston EB, Parker AJ. Vertical disparities and perception of 3-dimensional shape. Nature 1991;349:411-3.
13. Richards W. Structure from motion and stereo, J Opt Soc Am A 1985;2:343-9.
14. Johnston EB, Cumming BG, Landy MS. Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues. Vision Res 1994;34:2259-75.
15. Tittle JS, Todd JT, Perotti VJ, Norman JF. Systematic distortion of perceived three dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1995;21:663-78.
16. Bradshaw MF, Parton AD, Eagle RA. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in determining perceived depth and perceived size. Perception 1998;27:1317-31.
17. Brenner E, van Damme WJM. Perceived distance, shape and size. Vision Res 1999;39:975-86.
18. Landy MS, Brenner E. Motion-disparity interaction and the scaling of stereoscopic disparity. In: Harris LR, Jenkin MRM, editors, Vision and Attention (pp. 129-151). New York: Springer Verlag; 2001; p.129-51.
19. Rogers BJ, Cagenello RB. Disparity curvature and the perception of three dimensional surfaces. Nature 1989;339:135-7.
20. Rogers BJ, Bradshaw MF. Are different estimates of 'd' used in disparity scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995b;36:230.
21. Gårding, Porrill J, Mayhew JEW, Frisby JP. Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations. Vision Res 1995;35:703-22.
22. Bulthoff HH, Edelman SY, Tarr MJ. How are 3-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cereb Cortex 1995;5:247-60.
23. Paillard J. The multichannelling of visual cues and the organisation of a visually guided response. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J, editors, Tutorials in Motor Behaviour. North-Holland Publishing Company; 1980.
24. Jeannerod M. The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.
25. Servos P, Goodale MA, Jackobson LS. The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis. Vision Res 1992;32:119-27.
26. Bridgeman B, Kirch M, Sperling A. Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Percept Psychophys 1981; 29:336-42.
27. Goodale MA, Milner AD, Jakobson LS, Carey DP. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 1991;349:154-6.
28. Aglioti S, Goodale MA, DeSouza JFX. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand, Curr Biol 1995;5:679-85.
29. Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Daprati E, Saetti MC, Toni I. Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:369-76.
30. Bradshaw MF, Watt SJ Pre-movement delay allows a dissociation between visuo-motor and visuo-perceptual judgements in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 2002;40:1766-78.
31. Milner AD, Goodale MA. The visual brain in action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
32. Hibbard PB, Bradshaw MF. Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity and the control of prehension. Exp Brain Res 2002 (accepted).
33. Jeannerod M. The timing of natural prehension movements. J Mot Behav 1984;16:235-54.
34. Jeannerod M, Decety J. The accuracy of visuomotor transformation. An investigation into the mechanisms of visual recognition of objects. In: Goodale MA, editor, Vision and Action: the control of grasping. Norwood: New Jersey, 1990: p.33-48.
35. Oppenheim AV, Shafer RW. Discrete-Time Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1989.
36. Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF. Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38:1473-81.
37. Hibbard PB, Bradshaw MF. Isotropic integration of binocular disparity and relative motion in the perception of three-dimensional shape. Spat Vis 2002; 15:205-19.
38. Mon-Williams M, Dijkerman HC. The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension, Exp Brain Res 1999;128:578-82.
39. Watt SJ, Bradshaw MF. The role of binocular disparity and motion parallax in reaching to grasp objects. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2002 (in press).
40. Marotta JJ, Goodale MA. The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping, Exp Brain Res 1998;121:465-70.
41. Wing AM, Turton A, Fraser C. Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. J Mot Behav 1986;18:245-60.
42. Hogervorst MA, Eagle RA. The role of perspective effects and accelerations in perceived three-dimensional structure-from-motion. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2000;26:934-55.
43. Sakata H, Taira M. Parietal control of hand action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1994;4:847-56.
44. Bradshaw MF, Elliot KM The role of binocular information in the 'on-line' control of prehension. Spat Vis, Special Issue (submitted).