Assessing statistical precision, power, and robustness of alternative experimental designs for two color microarray platforms based on mixed effects models

Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology

Volumn 105, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 175-186

  Tempelman, Robert J ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Analysis of variance; Mixed effects models; Power; Precision; Robustness; Two color microarrays

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ERROR; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HYBRIDIZATION; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; NONHUMAN; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS;

EID: 16244396432     PISSN: 01652427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. D.B. Allison, and C.S. Coffey Two-stage testing in microarray analysis: what is gained? J. Gerontol. 57A 2002 B189 B192
2. J.C. Barrett, and E.S. Kawasaki Microarrays: the use of oligonucleotides and cDNA for the analysis of gene expression Drug Dicov. Today 8 2003 134 141
3. M.A. Black, and R.W. Doerge Calculation of the minimum number of replicate spots required for detection of significant gene expression fold change in microarray experiments Bioinformatics 18 2002 1609 1616
4. T.-M. Chu, B.S. Weir, and R.D. Wolfinger A systematic statistical linear modeling approach to oligonucleotide array experiments Math. Biosci. 176 2002 35 51
5. T.-M. Chu, B.S. Weir, and R.D. Wolfinger Comparison of Li-Wong and loglinear mixed models for the statistical analysis of oligonucleotide arrays Bioinformatics 20 2004 500 506
6. G.A. Churchill Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarrays Nat. Genet. 32 Suppl. 2002 490 495
7. W.G. Cochran, and G.M. Cox Experimental Designs second ed. 1957 Wiley New York
8. Cui, X., Churchill, G.A., 2003. How many mice and how many arrays? Replication in mouse cDNA microarray experiments.
9. K. Dobbin, J.H. Shih, and R. Simon Questions and answers on design of dual-label microarrays for identifying differentially expressed genes J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 95 2003 1362 1369
10. K. Dobbin, J.H. Shih, and R. Simon Statistical design of reverse dye microarrays Bioinformatics 19 2003 803 810
11. K. Dobbin, and R. Simon Comparison of microarray designs for class comparisons and class discovery Bioinformatics 18 2002 1438 1445
12. A.A. Dombkowski, B.J. Thibodeau, S.L. Starcevic, and R.F. Novak Gene-specific dye bias in microarray reference designs FEBS Lett. 560 2004 120 124
13. G.F.V. Glonek, and P.J. Solomon Factorial and time course designs for cDNA microarray experiments Biostatistics 5 2004 89 111
14. W.-P. Hsieh, T.-M. Chu, R.D. Wolfinger, and G. Gibson Mixed-model reanalysis of primate data suggests tissue and species biases in oligonucleotide-based gene expression profiles Genetics 165 2003 747 757
15. W. Jin, R.M. Riley, R.D. Wolfinger, K.P. White, G. Passador-Gurgel, and G. Gibson The contribution of sex, genotype, and age to transcriptional variance in Drosophila melanogaster Nat. Genet. 29 2001 389 395
16. C.M. Kendziorski, Y. Zhang, H. Lan, and A.D. Attie The efficiency of pooling mRNA in microarray experiments Biostatistics 4 2003 465 477
17. M.K. Kerr Design considerations for efficient and effective microarray studies Biometrics 59 2003 822 828
18. M.K. Kerr, and G.A. Churchill Experimental design for gene expression arrays Biostatistics 2 2001 183 201
19. R.C. Littell, G.A. Milliken, W.W. Stroup, and R.D. Wolfinger SAS System for Mixed Models 1996 SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC
20. L.M. McShane, J.H. Shih, and A.M. Michalowska Statistical issues in the design and analysis of gene expression microarray studies of animal models J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 8 2003 359 374
21. G.A. Milliken, and D.E. Johnson Analysis of Messy Data: Designed Experiments, vol. 1 1984 Wadsworth, Inc. Belmont, CA
22. D.V. Nguyen, A.B. Arpat, N. Wang, and R.J. Carroll DNA microarray experiments: biological and technological aspects Biometrics 58 2002 707 717
23. G.P. Page, J.W. Edwards, S. Barnes, R. Weindruch, and D.B. Allison A design and statistical perspective on microarray gene expression studies in nutrition: the need for playful creativity and scientific hard-mindedness Nutrition 19 2003 997 1000
24. C.C. Pritchard, L. Hsu, J. Delrow, and P.S. Nelson Project normal: defining normal variance in mouse gene expression Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 2001 13266 13271
25. J.C. Rockett, and G.M. Hellmann Confirming microarray data - is it really necessary? Genomics 83 2004 541 549
26. R. Simon, M. Radmacher, and K. Dobbin Design of studies using DNA microarrays Genet. Epidemiol. 23 2002 21 36
27. W.W. Stroup Mixed model procedures to assess power, precision, and sample size in the design of experiments Proceedings of the Biopharmaceutical Section of the American Statistical Association 1999 15 24
28. W.W. Stroup Power analysis based on spatial mixed effects analysis: a tool for comparing design and analysis strategies in the presence of spatial variability J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 7 2002 491 511
29. R.J. Tempelman Experimental design and statistical methods for classical and bioequivalence hypothesis testing with an application to dairy nutrition studies J. Anim. Sci. 82 Suppl. E. 2004 E162 E172
30. R.D. Wolfinger, G. Gibson, E.D. Wolfinger, L. Bennett, H. Hamadeh, P. Bushel, C. Afshari, and R.S. Paules Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed models J. Comp. Biol. 8 2001 625 637
31. G.W. Wright, and R.M. Simon A random variance model for detection of differential gene expression in small microarray experiments Bioinformatics 18 2003 2448 2455
32. H. Wu, M.K. Kerr, X. Cui, and G.A. Churchill MAANOVA: a software package for the analysis of spotted cDNA microarray experiments G. Parmigiani E.S. Garrett R.A. Irizarry S.L. Zeger The Analysis of Gene Expression Data 2003 Springer-Verlag New York 313 341
33. M.C.K. Yang, J.J. Yang, R.A. McIndoe, and J.X. Xhe Microarray experimental design: power and sample size considerations Physiol. Genomics 16 2003 24 28
34. F. Yates Incomplete randomized blocks Ann. Eugen. 7 1936 121 140
35. F. Yates A new method of arranging variety trials involving a large number of varieties J. Agric. Sci. 26 1936 424 455