Methods of assessment of cleft-related facial deformity: A review

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 145-156

  Al Omari, I ^a   Millett, D T ^b   Ayoub, A F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN   (Jordan)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^c GLASGOW DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Appearance; Cleft related deformity; Clinical; Three dimensional assessment; Two dimensional

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL FEATURE; FACE DEFORMITY; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; STIMULUS;

CEPHALOMETRY; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; ESTHETICS; FACE; FACIES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 14844350445     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/02-149.1     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Al-Omari I, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Bock M, Ray A, Dunaway D, Crampin L. An appraisal of three methods of rating facial deformity in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2003;40:530-537.
2. Anastassov GE, Joos U, Zollner B. Evaluation of the results of delayed rhinoplasty in cleft lip and palate patients. Functional and aesthetic implications and factors that affect successful nasal repair. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;36:416-424.
3. Asher-McDade C, Brattstrom V, Dahl E, McWilliam J, Molsted K, Plint DA, Prahl-Anderson B, Semb G, Shaw WC, The RP. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:409-412.
4. Asher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw WC, Gallager C. Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:385-390.
5. Assuncao AG. The V.L.S. classification for secondary deformities in the unilateral cleft lip: clinical application. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45:293-296.
6. Atack NE, Hathorn IS, Semb G, Dowell T, Sandy JR. A new index for assessing surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects aged five: reproducibility and validity. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997;34:242-246.
7. Ayoub AF, Siebert P, Moos KF, Wray D, Urquhart C, Niblett TB. A vision-based three-dimensional capture system for maxillofacial assessment and surgical planning. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;36:353-357.
8. Ayoub AF, Wray D, Moos KF, Siebert P, Jin J, Niblett TB, Urquhart C, Mowforth R. Three-dimensional modeling for modern diagnosis and planning in maxillofacial surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1996;11:225-233.
9. Becker M, Svensson H, Jacobsson S. Clinical examination compared with morphometry of digital photographs for evaluation of repaired cleft lips. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998;32:301-306.
10. Bennett ME, Phillips CL. Assessment of health-related quality of life for patients with severe skeletal disharmony: a review of the issues. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1999;14:65-75.
11. Benson PE, Richmond S. A critical appraisal of measurement of the soft tissue outline using photographs and video. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:397-409.
12. Berkeley WT. The cleft lip-nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1959;23:567-575.
13. Berscheid E, Walster E. Physical Attractiveness in Experimental Psychology. New York: Academic Press; 1974.
14. Brattström V, McWilliam J, Larson O, Semb G. Craniofacial development in children with unilateral clefts of the lip, alveolus, and palate treated according to three different regimes. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1992;26:313-319.
15. Broder H, Strauss RP. Self-concept of early primary school age children with visible or invisible defects. Cleft Palate J. 1989;26:114-117.
16. Burke PH, Beard LF. Stereophotogrammetry of the face. Am J Orthod. 1967;53:769-782.
17. Coghlan BA, Laitung JK, Pigott RW. A computer-aided method of measuring nasal symmetry in the cleft lip nose. Br J Plast Surg. 1993;46:13-17.
18. Coghlan BA, Matthews B, Pigott RW. A computer-based method of measuring facial asymmetry. Results from an assessment of the repair of cleft lip deformities. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40:371-376.
19. Cussons PD, Murison MS, Fernandez AE, Pigott RW. A panel based assessment of early versus no nasal correction of the cleft lip nose. Br J Plast Surg. 1993;46:7-12.
20. Dado DV, Rosenstein SW, Alder ME, Kernahan DA. Long-term assessment of early alveolar bone grafts using three-dimensional computer-assisted tomography: a pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:1840-1845.
21. De Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:67-73.
22. Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972;24:285-290.
23. Dixon DA, Newton I. Minimal forms of the cleft syndrome demonstrated by stereophotogrammetric surveys of the face. Br Dent J. 1972;132:183-189.
24. Duffy S, Noar JH, Evans RD, Sanders R. Three-dimensional analysis of the child cleft face. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:137-144.
25. Edler RJ. Background considerations to facial aesthetics. J Orthod. 2001;28:159-168.
26. Eliason MJ, Hardin MA, Olin WH. Factors that influence ratings of facial appearance for children with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:190-193.
27. Evans R, Shaw W. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 1987;9:314-318.
28. Farkas LG, Bryson W, Klotz J. Is photogrammetry of the face reliable? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;66:346-355.
29. Farkas LG, Hajnis K, Posnick JC. Anthropometric and anthroposcopic findings of the nasal and facial region in cleft patients before and after primary lip and palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993;30:1-12.
30. Feragen KJ, Semb G, Magnussen S. Asymmetry of left versus right unilateral cleft impairments: an experimental study of face perception. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36:527-532.
31. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Colombo A, Tartaglia G. The relationship between facial 3-D morphometry and the perception of attractiveness in children. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1997;12:145-152.
32. Fisher DM, Lo LJ, Chen YR, Noordhoff MS. Three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis of the primary nasal deformity in 3-month-old infants with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1826-1834.
33. Foong KW, Sandham A, Ong SH, Wong CW, Wang Y, Kassim A. Surface laser scanning of the cleft palate deformity - validation of the method. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1999;28:642-649.
34. Frey M, Giovanoli P, Gerber H, Slameczka M, Stussi E. Three-dimensional video analysis of facial movements: a new method to assess the quantity and quality of the smile. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:2032-2039.
35. Fricker JP. Standardized facial photography. Aust Orthod J. 1982;7:168-173.
36. Friede H, Lilja J, Johanson B. Lip-nose morphology and symmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients following a two-stage lip closure. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;14:55-64.
37. Glass L. The Effects of Cosmetic Appearance and Speech on Patients With Oro-Facial Anomalies. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota; 1978. Dissertation.
38. Glass L, Starr CD. A study of relationships between judgments of speech and appearance of patients with orofacial clefts. Cleft Palate J. 1979;16:436-440.
39. Glass L, Starr CD, Stewart RE, Hodge SE. Indentikit model II - a potential tool for judging cosmetic appearance. Cleft Palate J. 1981;18:147-151.
40. Gotfredsen E, Kragskov J, Wenzel A. Development of a system for craniofacial analysis from monitor-displayed digital images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999;28:123-126.
41. Hajeer MY, Ayoub AF, Millett DT, Bock M, Siebert JP. Three-dimensional imaging in orthognathic surgery: the clinical application of a new method. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 2002;17:318-330.
42. Howells DJ, Shaw WC. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:402-408.
43. Johnson N, Sandy J. An aesthetic index for evaluation of cleft repair. Eur J Orthod. 2003;25:243-249.
44. Kawai T, Natsume N, Shibata H, Yamamoto T. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology using moire stripes. Part II. Analysis of normal adults. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;19:359-362.
45. Keuning KH, Wieneke GH, Dejonckere PH. The intrajudge reliability of the perceptual rating of cleft palate speech before and after pharyngeal flap surgery: the effect of judges and speech samples. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36:328-333.
46. Kiyak HA, Hohl T, West RA, McNeill RW. Psychologic changes in orthognathic surgery patients: a 24-month follow up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984;42:506-512.
47. Kohout MP, Aljaro LM, Farkas LG, Ulliken JB. Photogrammetric comparison of two methods for synchronous repair of bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1339-1349.
48. Kyrkanides S, Bellohusen R, Subtelny JD. Asymmetries of the upper lip and nose in noncleft and postsurgical unilateral cleft lip and palate individuals. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33:306-311.
49. Laitung JK, Coghlan BA, Pigott RW. A comparison of computer versus panel assessment of two groups of patients with cleft lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg. 1993;46:18-21.
50. Lazarus DD, Hudson DA, van Zyl JE, Fleming AN, Fernandes D. Repair of unilateral cleft lip: a comparison of five techniques. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;41:587-594.
51. Lindsay WK, Farkas LG. The use of anthropometry in assessing the cleft-lip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972;49:286-293.
52. Marcusson A, List T, Paulin G, Kerlind I. Reliability of a multidimensional questionnaire for adults with treated complete cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 2001;35:271-278.
53. Mars M, Plint DA, Houston WJ, Bergland O, Semb G. The Goslon Yardstick: a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24:314-322.
54. Morrant DG, Shaw WC. Use of standardized video recordings to assess cleft surgery outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33:134-142.
55. Moss JP, Linney AD, Lowey MN. The use of three-dimensional techniques in facial esthetics. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:94-104.
56. Patzer GL. The Physical Attractiveness Phenomena. New York: Plenum Press; 1984.
57. Ras F, Habets LL, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Facial left-right dominance in cleft lip and palate: three-dimension evaluation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994a;31:461-465.
58. Ras F, Habets LL, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1994b;31:116-121.
59. Richman LC. The effects of facial disfigurement on teachers perceptions of ability in cleft palate children. Cleft Palate J. 1978;15:155-160.
60. Richman LC, Holmes CS, Eliason MJ. Adolescents with cleft lip and palate: self-perceptions of appearance and behavior related to personality adjustment. Cleft Palate J. 1985;22:93-96.
61. Roberts-Harry DP, Evans R, Hathorn IS. Effects of different surgical regimes on nasal asymmetry and facial attractiveness in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:274-278.
62. Roberts-Harry D, Stephens CD. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:152-153.
63. Robertson NR. Telecentric photogrammetry. Am J Orthod. 1981;80:623-637.
64. Russell KA, Waldman SD, Lee JM. Video-imaging assessment of nasal morphology in individuals with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:542-550.
65. Russell KA, Waldman SD, Tompson B, Lee JM. Nasal morphology and shape parameters as predictors of nasal aesthetics in individuals with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38:476-485.
66. Schneiderman CR, Harding JB. Social ratings of children with cleft lip by school peers. Cleft Palate J. 1984;21:219-223.
67. Shaw WC. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod. 1981;79:399-415.
68. Shaw WC, Asher-McDade C, Brattström V, Dahl E, McWilliam J, Molsted K, Plint DA, Prahl-Andersen B, Semb G, The RP. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 1. Principles and study design. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:393-397.
69. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles CR. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:21-26.
70. Skoog T. Repair of unilateral cleft lip deformity: maxilla, nose and lip. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3:109-133.
71. Strauss RA, Weis D, Lindauer SJ, Rebellato J, Isaacson RJ. Variability of facial photographs for use in treatment planning for orthodontic and orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1997;12:197-203.
72. Takasaki H. Moiré topography. Appl Opt. 1970;9:1457-1472.
73. Tedesco LA, Albino JE, Cunat JJ, Green LJ, Lewis EA, Slakter MJ. A dental-facial attractiveness scale. Part I. Reliability and validity. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:38-43.
74. Tobiasen JM. Social judgments of facial deformity. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24:323-327.
75. Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM. Clefting and psychosocial adjustment. Influence of facial aesthetics. Clin Plast Surg. 1993a;20:623-631.
76. Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM. Combined effects of severity of cleft impairment and facial attractiveness on social perception: an experimental study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993b;30:82-86.
77. Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM. Reliability of esthetic ratings of cleft impairment. Cleft Palate J. 1988;25:313-317.
78. Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM, Boraz RA. Development of scales of severity of facial cleft impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:419-424.
79. Tübergen D, Manegold BC. Electronic photography: a new age of medical imaging? J Audio Media Med. 1993;16:123-128.
80. Turner SR, Rumsey N, Sandy JR. Psychological aspects of cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:407-415.
81. Van Demark DR, Hardin MA. Effectiveness of intensive articulation therapy for children with cleft palate. Cleft Palate J. 1986;23:215-224.
82. Vannier MW, Pilgram TK, Bhatia G, Brunsden B, Nemecek JR, Young VL. Quantitative three-dimensional assessment of face-lift with an optical facial surface scanner. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;30:204-211.
83. Vegter F, Mulder JW, Hage JJ. Major residual deformities in cleft patients: a new anthropometric approach. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997;34:106-110.
84. Vegter F, Hage JJ. Facial anthropometry in cleft patients: a historical appraisal. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001;38:577-581.
85. Vegter F, Hage JJ. Standardized facial photography of cleft patients: just fit the grid. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:435-440.
86. Williams HB. A method of assessing cleft lip repairs: comparison of Le-Mesurier and Millard techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;41:103-107.
87. Yamada T, Mori Y, Minami K, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Sakuda M. Computer aided three-dimensional analysis of nostril forms: application in normal and operated cleft lip patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1999;27:345-353.
88. Yamada T, Sugahara T, Mori Y, Sakuda M. Rapid three-dimensional measuring system for facial surface structure. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:2108-2113.