An appraisal of three methods of rating facial deformity in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 530-537

  Al Omari, I ^d   Millett, D T ^d   Ayoub, A ^a   Bock, M ^a   Ray, A ^b   Dunaway, D ^c   Crampin, L ^d  

^a GLASGOW DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b CANNIESBURN PLASTIC SURGERY UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^c GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d Glasgow Dental Hospital and School ^*

Author keywords

Clinical assessment; Color transparencies; Facial appearance; Lay and professional assessors; Three dimensional images; Unilateral cleft lip and palate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FACE DEFORMITY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NOSE MALFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHILD; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; ESTHETICS; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0141453262     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569(2003)040<0530:AAOTMO>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2002.
2. Anastassov GE, Joos U, Zollner B. Evaluation of the results of delayed rhinoplasty in cleft lip and palate patients. Functional and aesthetic implications and factors that affect successful nasal repair. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;36:416-424.
3. Asher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw WC, Gallager C. Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:385-390.
4. Ayoub AF, Siebert P, Moos KF, Wray D, Urquhart C, Niblett TB. A vision-based three-dimensional capture system for maxillofacial assessment and surgical planning. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;36:353-357.
5. Ayoub AF, Wray D, Moos KF, Siebert P, Jin J, Niblett TB, Urquhart C, Mow-forth R. Three-dimensional modeling for modern diagnosis and planning in maxillofacial surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1996; 11:225-233.
6. Becker M, Svensson H, Jacobsson S. Clinical examination compared with morphometry of digital photographs for evaluation of repaired cleft lips. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1998;32:301-306.
7. Billaud Feragen K, Semb G, Magnussen S. Asymmetry of left versus right unilateral cleft impairments: an experimental study of face perception. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999;36:527-532.
8. Brattström V, McWilliam J, Larson O, Semb G. Craniofacial development in children with unilateral clefts of the lip, alveolus, and palate treated according to three different regimes. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg. 1992;26:313-319.
9. Coghlan BA, Matthews B, Pigott RW. A computer-based method of measuring facial asymmetry. Results from an assessment of the repair of cleft lip deformities. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40:371-376.
10. Cussons PD, Murison MS, Fernandez AE, Pigott RW. A panel based assessment of early versus no nasal correction of the cleft lip nose. Br J Plast Surg. 1993;46:7-12.
11. Duffy S, Noar JH, Evans RD, Sanders R. Three-dimensional analysis of the child cleft face. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000;37:137-144.
12. Eliason MJ, Hardin MA, Olin WH. Factors that influence ratings of facial appearance for children with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:190-193.
13. Farkas LG, Bryson W, Klotz J. Is photogrammetry of the face reliable? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;66:346-355.
14. Farkas LG, Hajnis K, Posnick JC. Anthropometric and anthroposcopic findings of the nasal and facial region in cleft patients before and after primary lip and palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993;30:1-12.
15. Howells DJ, Shaw WC. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:402-408.
16. Michiels G, Sather AH. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1994;9:43-54.
17. Morrant DG, Shaw WC. Use of standardized video recordings to assess cleft surgery outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33:134-142.
18. Ras F, Habets LL, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B. Method for quantifying facial asymmetry in three dimensions using stereophotogrammetry. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:233-239.
19. Richman LC. The effects of facial disfigurement on teacher's perceptions of ability in cleft palate children. Cleft Palate J. 1978;15:155-160.
20. Roberts-Harry DP, Evans R, Hathorn IS. Effects of different surgical regimes on nasal asymmetry and facial attractiveness in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:274-278.
21. Roberts-Harry D, Stephens CD. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:152-153.
22. Sandy J, Williams A, Mildinhall S, Murphy T, Bearn D, Shaw B, Sell D, Devlin B, Murray J. The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Cleft Lip and Palate Study. Br J Orthod. 1998;25:21-30.
23. Shaw WC, Asher-McDade C, Brattström V, Dahl E, McWilliam J, Molsted K, Plint DA, Prahl-Andersen B, Semb G. The RP. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: part 1. Principles and study design. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29:393-397.
24. Tedesco LA, Albino JE, Cunat JJ, Green LJ, Lewis EA, Slakter MJ. A dental-facial attractiveness scale. Part I. Reliability and validity. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:38-43.
25. Tobiasen JM. Scaling facial impairment. Cleft Palate J. 1989;26:249-254.
26. Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM. Combined effects of severity of cleft impairment and facial attractiveness on social perception: an experimental study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993;30:82-86.
27. Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM. Reliability of esthetic ratings of cleft impairment. Cleft Palate J. 1988;25:313-317.
28. Tobiasen JM, Hiebert JM, Boraz RA. Development of scales of severity of facial cleft impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:419-424.
29. Williams HB. A method of assessing cleft lip repairs: comparison of Le-Mesurier and Millard techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;41:103-107.
30. Yamada T, Mori Y, Minami K, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Sakuda M. Computer aided three-dimensional analysis of nostril forms: application in normal and operated cleft lip patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1999;27:345-353.