A new index for assessing surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects aged five: Reproducibility and validity

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 242-246

  Atack, Nikki E ^a   Hathorn, Iain S ^a   Semb, Gunvor ^b   Dowell, Tom ^a   Sandy, Jonathan R ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

index; pediatric; surgical outcome; unilateral cleft lip and palate

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; FEMALE; GROWTH; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; DENTAL MODELS; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; JAW RELATION RECORD; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGNOSIS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, ORAL;

EID: 0030916725     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569(1997)034<0242:ANIFAS>2.3.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ABRAHAMSON JH. Survey methods in community medicine. 4th Ed. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1990:152-153.
2. ALTMAN DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991:285-288, 403-409.
3. ATACK NE, HATHORN IS, MARS M, SANDY JR. The use of study models of 5-year-old children as predictors of surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod 1997 (in press).
4. ASHER-MCDADE C, ROBERTS C, SHAW WC, GALLAGER C. Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:385-391.
5. CABRE A, GIGGIN KP, HENLEY M, NASHED RN. Specialised multidisciplinary team can solve problems of distance (letter). BMJ 1995;311:1431-1432.
6. CUSSONS PD, MURISON MS, FERNANDEZ AE, PIGOTT RW. A panel based assessment of early versus no nasal correction of cleft lip nose. Br J Plast Surg 1993;46:7-12.
7. FRIEDE H, ENOCSON L, LILJA J. Features of maxillary arch and nasal cavity in infancy and their influence on deciduous occlusion in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1988;22:69-75.
8. HOUSTON WJB. The current status of facial growth prediction: a review. Br J Orthod 1979;6:11-17.
9. LEE ST, COLE O, MCNANAMNY D, et al International Committee on Cleft Documentation and Measurement: recommendations. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Cleft Palate and Related Craniofacial Anomalies, Australia, 1993.
10. MACKAY F, BOTTOMLEY J, SEMB G, ROBERTS C. Dentofacial form in the 5-year-old child with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1994;31:372-375.
11. MARKUS T, WARD BOOTH P. Managed cleft lip and palate (editorial). BMJ 1995a;311:765-766.
12. MARKUS T, WARD BOOTH P. Author's reply. BMJ 1995b;311:1432-1433.
13. MARS M, ASHER-MCDADE C, BRATTSTROM V, et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 3. Dental arch relationships. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:405-408.
14. MARS M, PLINT DA, HOUSTON WJB, et al. The Goslon Yardstick: a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 1987;24:314-322.
15. NOVERRAZ AEM, KUIJPERS-JAGTMAN AM, MARS M, VAN'T HOF MA. Timing of hard palate closure and dental arch relationships in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: a mixed-longitudinal study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:391-396.
16. PIGOTT RW. Trials of management are inevitably long (letter). BMJ 1995; 311:1431.
17. RICHMOND S, TURBILL EA, ANDREWS M. Calibration of non-dental and dental personnel in the use of the PAR Index. Br J Orthod 1993;20:231-234.
18. ROBERTS CT, SEMB G, SHAW WC. Strategies for the advancement of surgical methods in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:141-149.
19. ROBERTS-HARRY DP, EVANS R, HATHORN IS. Effects of different surgical regimes on nasal asymmetry and facial attractiveness in patients with clefts of the lip and cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:274-278.
20. SELL DA. An invitation for Markus to present his results (letter). BMJ 1995; 311:1432.
21. SHAW WC, DAHL E, ASHER-MCDADE C, et al. A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with cleft of the lip and palate: Part 5. General discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29: 413-418.
22. SHAW WC, SEMB G. Current approaches to the orthodontic management of cleft lip and palate. J R Soc Med 1990;83:30-33.
23. TIMMONS MJ. Editorial proves controversial (letter). BMJ 1995;311:1431.