Clinical examination compared with morphometry of digital photographs for evaluation of repaired cleft lips

Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 301-306

  Becker, Magnus ^a   Svensson, Henry ^a   Jacobsson, Sten ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cleft lip; Clinical evaluation; Digital photos; Morphometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLEFT LIP; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NOSE; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

ADULT; CLEFT LIP; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 11744283527     PISSN: 02844311     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02844319850158642     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Asher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw WC, Gallager C. Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991; 28: 385-390.
2. Becker M, Svensson H. Morphometry in digital photographs: a promising technique for assessing patients with cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1998; 32: 295-299.
3. Berscheid E, Walster E. Physical attractiveness. In: Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
4. Brattström V, McWilliam J, Larson O, Semb G. Craniofacial development in children with unilateral clefts of the lip, alveolus, and palate treated according to three different regimes. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1992; 26: 313-319.
5. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 37-46.
6. Collin C. Photo CD in practice. J Audiov Media Med 1994; 17: 21-22.
7. Cosman B, Crikelair G. The shape of the unilateral cleft lip defect. Plast Reconstr Surg 1965; 25: 314-318.
8. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1981.
9. Friede H, Lilja J, Johanson B. Lip-nose morphology and symmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients following a two-stage lip closure. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 14: 55-64.
10. Howell DJ, Shaw WC. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 402-408.
11. Jones KL, Hansson JW, Smith DW. Palpebral fissure size in newborn infants. J Pediatr 1978; 92: 787.
12. Larsson O, Nilsson B. Early bone grafting in complete cleft lip and palate cases following maxillofacial orthopedics. VI: Assessments from photographs and anthropometric measurements. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 17: 205-223.
13. Lindsay WK, Farkas LG. The use of anthropometry in assessing the cleft lip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 49: 286-293.
14. Millard DR. Refinements in rotation advancement cleft lip technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1964; 33: 26-38.
15. Patzer GL The physical attractiveness phenomena. New York: Plenum Press, 1984.
16. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles CR. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 21-26.
17. Tobiasen JM. Scaling facial impairment. Cleft Palate J 1989; 26: 249-254.
18. Tubergen D, Manegold BC. Electronic photography: a new age of medical imaging. J Audiov Media Med 1993; 16: 123-128.